Skip to main content

Christmas at Bethlehem

From the Washington Post


Bethlehem, the place of Jesus’ birth, is not celebrating Christmas this time, says the Washington Post. The only scene related to Christmas is Jesus entering the world amid a pile of Gazan rubble.

Christmas is a festival of joy, peace, magnanimity – goodness, in general. It is a terrible irony that the very place of Jesus’ birth is marked by the opposite of all what Christmas stands for. What meaning will a Christmas carol like Joy to the World have in Bethlehem today?

What would Jesus say about the kind of religions that we have today? Isn’t religion the cause of all the strife in Bethlehem and many other places in the world? The Hamas who attacked Israel were motivated by religion. Israel is a nation founded on the bricks of a particular religion. It is another irony that Jesus was born in that religion.

Did Jesus found a new religion? I would hesitate to say ‘Yes’ to that question. His intention was to reform Judaism, his religion, not establish a new one. The problem is not with religions but with the believers, Jesus knew. That is why he said, “The Sabbath is made for man, not man for the Sabbath” [Mark 2:27]. The Jews were very particular about obeying the laws and rubrics of their religion. The Muslims are no less particular in that regard. Nowadays, this sort of vehement adherence to the rubrics at the cost of human love and relationships is contaminating Hinduism in India too.

Jesus would have questioned all these religions. If your religion makes you a blind follower of certain rules and rituals instead of making you a better human being, then your religion is useless, Jesus would affirm without any hesitation. Love was Jesus’ religion, not Christianity. Christianity as a religion is an invention of Saint Paul who came after Jesus. Jesus wanted people to love one another. And where there is love, there is no need for rules and rituals. That is why Saint Augustine said, “Love, and do as you will.”

Too many of our religions today (yesterday, as well) do the opposite of what they should be doing. Instead of promoting love, they generate hate. Jesus wasted his life!

My elder sister rang me this morning to greet me on Christmas. During the course of our conversation, she said, “Kerala (our state) has so many churches, religious programmes like retreats and Bible conventions… yet why is evil flourishing more than ever?” Jesus wasted his life!

The last sentence of the only novel I ever wrote, Black Hole, ends with these lines: “The cross smiled at Jesus. Jesus smiled back. They were in love with each other.” Those were the last words of the gospel being written by the protagonist of my novel, Ishan Salman Panicker. Ishan was of the view that Jesus wasted his life.

Jesus must have realised towards the end of his life that humankind was rather irredeemable. Will he choose to return to earth once more if his father, God, demands that?

Can there be another real Christmas, I mean?

Well. 


Comments

  1. Hari OM
    As ever, you hit the mark with your words... Love is it, with the capital 'ell', universal and untarnished. Turning ourselves to the Love is what builds and binds us. Blessings and Love to you this day, dear blogpal! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Yamini... You do mean a lot to me in this environment...

      Delete
  2. Religion was created by man to serve man's needs. This is why I don't have one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Beautifully penned reflections on Christmas at Bethlehem! This insightful blog captures the essence of the season. For excellent assignment help, visit audomyassignment and Pay Someone to Do My Assignment on such topics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Religion is a powerful tool to fight with the surreptitious intention of imperialism and to get united sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem is when religion becomes a political tool it is more dangerous than bombs.

      Delete
  5. Thank you for this thoughtful discussion. If you look into the historical record and the archeology of the region, the Jews are the indigenous people of Judea and Israel which were ancient kingdoms. People deserve to live in peace. Best wishes to you friend

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Jews had a painful and conquered history. But that doesn't justify what Israel is doing now in Palestine.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Taliban and India

Illustration by Copilot Designer Two things happened on 14 Oct 2025. One: India rolled out the red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban Administration’s Foreign Minister. Two: a young man was forced to wash the feet of a Brahmin and drink that water. This happened in Madhya Pradesh, not too far from where the Taliban leaders were being given regal reception in tune with India’s philosophy of Atithi Devo Bhava (Guest is God). Afghanistan’s Taliban and India’s RSS (which shaped Modi’s thinking) have much in common. The former seeks to build a state based on its interpretation of Islamic law aiming for a society governed by strict religious codes. The RSS promotes Hindutva, the idea of India as primarily a Hindu nation, where Hindu values form the cultural and political foundation. Both fuse religious identity with national identity, marginalising those who don’t fit their vision of the nation. The man who was made to wash a Brahmin’s feet and drink that water in Madh...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...