Skip to main content

Good Old Days without meetings


Let me tell you a story. The names of the characters may sound odd because the story is from Norway, one of the happiest countries in the world.

Thord Overass is the wealthiest and most influential member of the parish. He comes to the parish priest with a request to conduct a special baptism ceremony for his infant son. Special implies that it shouldn’t be a common ceremony with other infants of the parish. The parish priest agrees because Thord will pay for the ceremony. Money matters even in religion.

Sixteen years later, Thord approaches the priest once more with a similar request for the confirmation ceremony of his son. The priest again nods his consent because there is money in it. Let me add that the priest was not a greedy person. It’s just that money matters even for a priest.

Another eight years go and Thord approaches the priest once more, now for the wedding of his son. “Why, that is the richest girl in the parish,” the priest says when he hears the name of the bride. Thord says that the groom is his only child. “I want to do it handsomely.” Thord places three dollars on the priest’s table. The priest takes the money which is no small amount.

Well, three dollars and I’m saying ‘no small amount,’ you’re wondering, I know. What a silly story, you’re wondering more, I know. Now, let me tell you that I’m summarising a story written by a Nobel laureate. Bjornsterne Bjornsen was the third recipient of the Nobel for literature from the inception of the prize. He was born in 1832 and won the Nobel in 1903. Most of his stories were about peasants who he believed were the true representatives of his nation. More than a century later, today, we know how countries treat their farmers. Recall the yearlong struggle of farmers in Delhi recently. But, now, back to the story The Father.

The time has changed. I’m telling you a story from the good old days. This story was written in 1881, a time when life was quite simple though not easy. When was life easy anyway?

Well, the story didn’t end. Let me carry on.

A fortnight after the wedding of his son, Thord and his son had to cross the lake near their house out of necessity. They were in their boat when the thwart of the boat slipped and the son fell into the lake. The father, let me quote the original, “held the boat still, and stared at the spot where his son had gone down, as though he must surely come to the surface again. There rose some bubbles, then some more, and finally one large one that burst; and the lake lay there as smooth and bright as a mirror again.”

The people of the parish watched Thord searching for his son in the lake for three days restlessly. Finally he got the son’s dead body.

A year later, Thord visits the parish priest once again. With a large sum of money. Do “Something better” is all that he tells the priest. “I think your son has at last brought you a true blessing,” the priest says. Two big tears course slowly down Thord’s cheeks as he nods yes.

This post is part of a series I started a few days back [links below]. I was supposed to post my entry in the series yesterday. But a meeting I attended yesterday put me off so much that I couldn’t write anything when I reached home. I had a couple of drinks instead. The meeting was led by a priest who seems to think he knows everything and that his staff are all mental retards or something equivalent. He mocked us. I wanted to walk out many times. But I advised patience to myself.

I went to bed feeling sufficiently tipsy and wondered what my next post should be about. Then a number of priests rose in my consciousness, some real and more fictitious. Don Camillo was the best among them. But for some mysterious reason, this Norwegian story buoyed above Camillo. And here it is.

A century ago, the world was a much simpler place with no absurd meetings. “Do something better.” I want to join Thord. 


PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon

Previous Posts in this series:

1. Heights of Evil

2. Pip Learns the Essential Lessons

3. Delusions and Ironies of Love

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    An excellent post to aid some healing from the real world nonsense... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. my new blog is out do visit when you are freehttps://felixanoopthekkekara.blogspot.com/2024/09/boriska-kipriyanovich-i-lived-on-mars.html

      Delete
  2. Tommichan sir my new blog out read them when you are free
    https://felixanoopthekkekara.blogspot.com/2024/09/boriska-kipriyanovich-i-lived-on-mars.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a very intriguing post and I shall check out the related posts as well.
    And I do hope you are feeling much better now. Some days can be really hard!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm ok now. I don't let negative emotions to overwhelm me.

      Delete
  4. I'm sorry about your meeting. People can suck. And it's hard to write about things when your emotions are churning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People who haven't learnt to deal with their own personal drawbacks tend to insult others. I'm better than you, they want to prove.

      Delete
  5. The humour in this blog post was unexpected - I hate meetings too and feel they are the biggest waste of time and brain power. Life may not have been easy but it was simpler maybe because our intentions were more or less honourable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You said it: intentions or motives were more or less honourable.

      Delete
  6. That was a very interesting story to read. I wouldn't be surprised if Thord went to the priest and offer money to bury his so as well. As money matters even in death these days.... Loved your unexpected twist of the meeting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Back in the days of Thord, though money mattered much, human feelings and emotions were given due importance. Today, it's all money and ego.

      Delete
    2. Great thought provoking post! Allegorical and metaphorical!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...