Skip to main content

A Reflection on Tharoor’s Politics


Dr Shashi Tharoor is not a politician really. He has certain noble objectives like making his country better if possible: economically, culturally, and intellectually too – for all rather than a select few. That is why he keeps making statements like “The nation is more important than politics.”

His party, the Congress, cannot understand such notions because its leaders are all politicians. And politics is all about power and little else.

Politics is pursuit of power. It has nothing to do with serving the people. If you want to serve people, become a useful professional like a doctor, a teacher, an engineer, and so on, and contribute to the welfare of the people.

Politics is all about dominating, controlling, and influencing others and wilfully working to have your way against the opposition of others. That is why politicians spend huge sums of money on propaganda and self-publicity. They resort to all sorts of strategies to ensure that their domination is as total as it possibly can. For that, they may rewrite history, misuse the state machinery like the Enforcement Directorate and the judiciary, employ rhetoric in mass media programmes such as Mann ki Baat, and so on.

And also decimate other political parties. 

Shashi Tharoor’s invitation to head a foreign delegation is a highly political act on the part of PM Modi. Dr Tharoor is arguably the best choice for this purpose. Yet, it is impossible to think that Modi is acting with the welfare of the nation in mind. Modi is the prototypical politician: one who cannot live without absolute power over a lot of people. His ambition is to be the Viswaguru, the world’s master.

Dr Tharoor can be an asset in Modi’s gameplans. In the process, this appointment can turn the Congress against Tharoor and thus get him kicked out of the party. Who loses? The Congress loses a statesman and diplomat, a person who is a lot more than your average politician. Modi will have shot down two birds with one bullet.

The plain truth is that the Congress doesn’t deserve someone like Dr Tharoor. The present-day Congress is nothing more than a gang of some mediocre politicians who are trying to grab what little of power is available to a dying party. These politicians have never acknowledged the greatness of a man like Dr Tharoor. It is only natural that Tharoor feels frustrated in his party which doesn’t let him do any good merely because they are all afraid that he will grow too big for the party. They are afraid that the little powers they have will be lost.

My only prayer (to gods who may care to listen) is that Tharoor doesn’t join Modi’s political party against which he has written book after book. Modi’s party, as Tharoor is well aware, is meant only for keeping one man in the top seat. All others are just pawns on the immense political chess board. A few are lucky to be the bishops, rooks, and knights. There is a queen too, though she has the looks of a man. The multitude of pawns shout slogans for Modi, kill a few so-called enemies of the nation once in a while, and sacrifice themselves for all the illusions that are being peddled in the name of the nation and its ancient religion.

Seven years ago, Tharoor wrote about Modi that the “New India” which Modi was trying to create “appears littered with the wreckage of all that was good and noble about the old India.” [The Paradoxical Prime Minister] The wrecking is almost complete now. And a new India is being forged out of the debris. A new India of a few elite individuals. The old caste system is back with a bang in an entirely new shape. The power structure has changed outward. The bones within are still the same old ossified oligarchy if not kleptocracy.

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    This one is perhaps a bit too local to you for me to comment appropriately... I trust that Deepak supports what you wrote! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure you know Dr Tharoor. He had contested for no less a post than UN Secretary General's. Long ago, he was with the UNO.

      Delete
  2. Let's hope that power doesn't change him. Sadly, I think it might.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the lines, Politics is a pursuit of power...If you want to serve the nation...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The MLA of my neighboring constituency, Mathew Kuzhalnadan, is an exception. He donates his entire salary to welfare works.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...