Skip to main content

The rattle of desert sands

Religion

Never did I feel an urge to read the Quran until three things happened one after the other a few weeks back. One: a Muslim friend, whom I came to know years ago through blogging, said he had never read the Quran because he found it “boring.” I was amused, but not surprised because this friend’s wife was a Hindu and so his religious sentiments were, in all reasonable probability, not quite strident, let alone militant.

The second thing that happened within hours of the above Muslim friend’s confession was another friend’s – a Christian, this time – claim that he had read the whole of Quran and that he found hatred spilling out of “every page” of it. “Every page?” I was incredulous. “Well, almost,” he edited his statement rather reluctantly.

And a day after the above two came the third and the most amusing incident. A female Muslim blogger-acquaintance sent me a friend request on Facebook which I accepted without my usual hesitation merely because I knew her as a fellow-blogger. Then she didn’t like something I wrote about Islam somewhere in the vast world of FB. I responded to her comment by articulating my feeling that her religious sentiments appeared as brittle as those of most of her co-religionists. She let loose her fury before unfriending me as quickly as she had befriended me.

The first thing I did after all these was to google for “the best translation of the Quran.” Thus Amazon delivered to me in a couple of days the Oxford Classics edition of the holy book.

The 30-odd pages of Introduction by the scholarly translator prepared me for the shocks that awaited me in the suras (chapters) and ayas (verses) that followed. I was prepared to be wary of the Quran’s way of alluding to events without giving their historical background. Even God’s revelations are not eternal, I understood. They too belong to a particular historical time and geographical space. A lot of things that the Prophet heard from his God back then would be entirely different had he lived today. This implies that following the Quran literally today is absolutely absurd. We don’t live in the belligerent tribal cultures of the early medieval Arab world anymore.

The Introduction also taught me, among a lot many other things, that the holy book has a “highly concise style” which makes the meaning of the verses rather abstruse and hence amenable to numerous interpretations. The Prophet was a poet and the Quran is highly poetic. Poetic lines can be interpreted in infinite ways. Each reader can discover a meaning to suit their unique needs.

I had always thought that reading a holy book didn’t require so many introductory cautions. That a holy book was meant to inspire noble thoughts and feelings in us. That it was a moral and spiritual guiding star. A light that shines gently in the engulfing darkness of human affairs.

But the Introduction to the Oxford classical translation of the Quran by M A S Abdel Haleem taught me otherwise. I knew I was going to skate on thin ice the moment I turned the last page of the Introduction to the first sura: “In the name of God, the Lord of Mercy, the Giver of Mercy!” That line opens every sura only to move on to rather merciless, if not utterly terrifying, ayas. My second friend above was not wrong entirely, I began to think as I moved from sura to sura, aya to aya.

My first friend above is not right. The Quran is not at all boring. It is exciting. It excites an entire gamut of human passions many of which aren’t all that edifying. Any simple self-help book will do a lot better, I thought as I moved on. I understood why my third friend above behaved the way she did. No, not boring at all. Quite the contrary.

I have only read about a quarter of the book. That too, in a week’s time. I’m treading slowly and cautiously. It’s a bit too much for me to absorb. My bones can’t withstand all the rattle from an Eliotean land of roots that clutch at slippery desert sands. So I took a break and wrote this. My oasis among the rattling sand grains.

Previous Post: The Charm of Evil

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    Well isn't this spooky - only last month I was pondering the fact that, although I have read a great many religious texts of all sorts over the years, the Quran has not been among them... I was berating myself, for as a philosopher, it behooves one to read of all. Your reviews have always impressed me and this one has me wondering whether I ever will! I do hope you will provide another view when, finally, you complete the reading... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too hope that my impression will have reasons to change as I get on with it.

      Delete
  2. All 'holy books' are circumstantial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and the devotees need to understand that first of all. Truths are not eternal.

      Delete
  3. It is good to get to know different perspectives. It broadens our knowledge base and our understanding. Looking forward to your views after you complete the reading.
    (My latest post: Ellora Caves)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would love to write a lot on this. I'm holding myself back and you know why.

      Delete
  4. If you have not read the Quran in the original Arabic, you have not read it. Translations ate not Quran... On. the other hand, without interpretations any book is dead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was told that the Arabic original has a lyrical beauty. But the meaning remains the same as in a good translation, I guess. This translation is good, I think, because whereever there is chance for ambiguity the translator gives additional notes. But hatred does spill out almost everywhere, as my friend said. All poetry, whether in Arabic or whatever, becomes absurd when it says things like 5:51, 2:223, 9:5...

      Delete
  5. Good luck ;) I'm sure you're finding much of interest. I've never read the Quran. I've never read the Bible. Perhaps one of these days I'll decide to try some religious texts. (Probably not, though.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the wish :) It's interesting from a historical point of view. But from the religious point, it is very disquieting. The Bible' OT does put off a sensitive reader at times, but not with venomous hatred.

      Delete
  6. I have never seen the Quran. I have read bits and piece of the bible. I know the bible been redone several time though history, and I'm guessing the same for the Quran.
    I like to be a fair person. If I read one of them I would need to read both.
    I've said if I read either Mein Kampf I would need to read The Communist Manifesto.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe the Quran was not redone. Hadiths were added later, but they are not part of the Quran. Mein Kampf may be less venomous!

      Delete
  7. I think reading Quran with the help of a tafsir (exegesis) will be better as it will help you understand the context of the specific verse. I think in the case of Gospels, Jesus' stories are narrated rather chronologically, but in the case of Quran it's arranged randomly and there are a lot of jumps within each chapters. It might get confusing if you are reading it for first time without any context

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Truths of various colours

You have your truth and I have mine. There shouldn’t be a problem – until someone lies. Unfortunately, lying has been elevated as a virtue in present India. There are all sorts of truths, some of which are irrefutable. As a friend said the other day with a little frustration, the eternal truth is this: No matter how many times you check, the Wi-Fi will always run fastest when you don’t actually need it – and collapse the moment you’re about to hit Submit . Philosophers call it irony. Engineers call it Murphy’s Law. The rest of us just call it life. Life is impossible without countless such truths. Consider the following; ·       Change is inevitable. ·       Mortality is universal. ·       Actions have consequences. [Even if you may seem invincible, your karma will catch up, just wait.] ·       Water boils at 100 o C under normal atmospheric pressure. ·    ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Impact of Your Deed

Illustration by Copilot Designer Thirteen-year-old Briony makes a terrible mistake. She falsely accuses Robbie of raping Lola. Robbie is arrested. Cecilia is heartbroken. Briony herself regrets her act, but too late. All the painful harms have already been done. Atonement can be meaningless sometimes. Briony, Robbie, Cecilia, all belong to Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement (2001). Why did Briony make a false charge against Robbie? First of all, there was a serious misunderstanding. Briony presumed that Robbie’s romantic interest in Cecilia, Briony’s elder sister, was lust with a mask. Secondly, Briony was probably jealous of the relationship between her sister and Robbie. As a little child, Briony had jumped into a river merely to be saved by Robbie. When asked why she did such a dangerous thing, her answer was, “Because I love you.” Robbie is accused of raping Lola, Briony’s cousin. It was Paul Marshall who actually violated Lola, not once but twice. Briony did not see the man who r...