Skip to main content

The Charm of Evil

Wolf Larsen as imagined by Gemini AI

Book Chat

“Good-bye, Lucifer, proud spirit.” Maud Brewster pays her tribute to the dying Wolf Larsen, protagonist of Jack London’s novel The Sea Wolf (1904). Wolf is not Larsen’s real name. He got that name because of his inhuman personality traits. Maud Brewster calls him Lucifer and he might as well be that proud but fallen angel.

Larsen lives totally outside normal human conventions. He is the captain of a ship named Ghost. It is a seal-hunting schooner. Larsen is an absolute dictator on the ship and the entire novel takes place on that ship except a couple of chapters towards the end. (And those few chapters are rather boring.)

Might is right for Larsen. He is a staunch follower of the Darwinian principle of survival of the fittest. Fitness, for Larsen, is physical and it has nothing to do with the intellect and least of all with morality. Morality is a mere human construct, he argues, made for the safety of the weak.

“Might is right, and that is all there is to it.” Larsen tells the narrator, Humphrey van Weyden. “Weakness is wrong.” Larsen is an intelligent and well-read man. He has a good collection of books with him, including Shakespeare, Milton, Nietzsche, and the Bible. He can quote even the Bible to prove that human life is nothing but evil. The biblical book of Ecclesiastes finds “life and the works of life all a vanity and vexation, an evil thing.”

Once you convince yourself that might is right and all the rest is either evil or meaningless, life becomes a brutish affair, which is what it is on the Ghost. Not one of the crew on the ship likes Larsen. The narrator, who is an eminent literary critic, lands on that ship purely by chance: a shipwreck from which Larsen’s men pulled him up.

Humphrey van Weyden, the narrator whom Larsen rechristens as Hump contemptuously, is the opposite pole of Wolf Larsen. He has a highly sophisticated mind so much so he is utterly helpless in the beginning, finding himself amid a bunch of brutes who have no sense of ordinary morality, let alone literature. He has to unlearn many of his earlier lessons in order to survive among them. He is fortunate to have Maud Brewster, writer, joining them later because of another shipwreck.

Eventually, Larsen is abandoned by everyone. Some mysterious illness renders him blind. His crew run away and save themselves presumably. Humphrey and Maud are left alone with Larsen who prevents them from using his ship for their further movement. Larsen wants to die in the sea, where he is now, in a desolate region of the ocean, far away from any human habitation, die all alone. He mocks Humphrey’s inability to shoot him though the latter is utterly frustrated with Larsen’s wicked ways.

“Hump,” Larsen says as Humphrey stands with a gun in his hand, “you can’t do it. You are not exactly afraid. You are impotent. Your conventional morality is stronger than you. You are the slave to the opinions which have credence among the people you have known and have read about.  Their code has been drummed into your head from the time you lisped, and in spite of your philosophy and of what I have taught you, it won’t let you kill an unarmed, unresisting man.” [Emphasis added]

The major conflict in the novel is precisely this: the power of physical might versus the powerlessness of moral refinement. Larsen represents the former and all his crew practise that style of life though they don’t intellectualise it as Larsen does. Humphrey and Maud show us the possibility of being moral even in an utterly immoral world. They have fictions, dreams, ideals, unlike Larsen who has, or believes in, only physical might.

Larsen is a charming character. He holds the reader in a spell right from the beginning of the novel to the last page. There are a few pages where he doesn’t appear and those are the most boring pages of the novel though what we get there is a budding romance between Humphrey and Maud on their newfound little island where there is no other creature.

Larsen is a charm. Evil is what makes him charming. Like Milton’s Satan, William Golding’s Roger, and Shakespeare’s Iago, Jack London’s Larsen will refuse to leave our consciousness long after we put the novel aside.

I finished reading The Sea Wolf yesterday. It was the second time I read the book. Larsen invited me to read the book again after a gap of some 5 years. I woke up at about 3 this morning feeling Larsen’s spirit haunting my memory, my consciousness. The charm of evil – that’s what haunted me. What makes evil so much more enchanting than goodness? [Look at history and much of contemporary politics and you’ll see how wicked people have been admired by too many men and an increasing number of women too.]

What makes evil so enchanting? My morning contemplation began.

Goodness is often passive, submissive, obedient. Evil, in contrast, rebels, takes action, challenges limits. As Larsen says, Lucifer “led a lost cause, (but) he was not afraid of God’s thunderbolts. Hurled into hell, he was unbeaten…. He straightaway incited man to rebel against God and gained for himself and hell the major portion of all the generations of man.”

Larsen goes on to argue that Lucifer was beaten out of heaven not because he was less brave than God or less aspiring. Lucifer was a free spirit, that’s why. “He preferred suffering in freedom to all the happiness of a comfortable servility. He did not care to serve God. He cared to serve nothing. He was no figurehead. He stood on his own legs. He was an individual.” [Emphasis added]

Wolf Larsen is precisely that individual. He defies both moral norms and nature. He forges his own code and asserts power unapologetically.

Secondly, evil characters are more psychologically complex. They struggle with inner contradictions, wrestle with morality or normal human ideals. This makes them more ‘human’ and interesting. Larsen is a brute, yet he is intelligent, philosophical, and introspective. He is a Nietzschean figure caught between reason and instinct. And his self-knowledge is amazingly clear.

Like other powerful evil creations in literature, Larsen possesses a unique charisma and eloquence. He has the best dialogues in the novel. And they seduce not only the other characters, but the reader too. His rhetoric is sharp, ironic, persuasive. Larsen is terrifyingly admirable.

Fourthly, evil represents freedom unlike goodness which is constrained – bound by duty, rules, morality. People like Larsen live more fully, more dangerously – as Nietzsche counselled to. They are the typical archetypal outlaws and outlaws possess a peculiar charm – the charm of what we cannot be though we’d like to be, to some extent at least!

Finally, goodness is boring. Evil creates all the drama. You can’t have a compelling narrative with all saints around. Throw in a devil amidst the saintly sadhus or monks and see what fun ensues.

That is why Maud Brewster pays a tribute to Larsen in the end though she had found him utterly repulsive throughout the novel. That is also why Larsen woke me up at three this morning and sent me into contemplation.

My previous posts on this novel:

·      The Charm of the Devil - 1

·      The Charm of the Devil - 2

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    I only ever read Call Of The Wild, feeling no compulsion to read further of Jack London. May have to give it a go. As ever, your review draws one in! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a review really. It's a classic published more than a century ago. I took a look at its major theme, that's all.

      Delete
  2. I've never been a fan of Jack London. I don't like wilderness stories. And in this case, ocean would be wilderness. I think the problem here is how you defined good and evil. Societal conventions don't make one good. The evil themselves don't believe in evil. They believe in power, and whatever it takes to gain power is necessary. This is shortsighted, but you'll never convince them of that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we won't ever succeed in showing the wicked where their error lies.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Dopamine

Fiction Mathai went to the kitchen and picked up a glass. The TV was screening a program called Ask the Doctor . “Dopamine is a sort of hormone that gives us a feeling of happiness or pleasure,” the doc said. “But the problem with it is that it makes us want more of the same thing. You feel happy with one drink and you obviously want more of it. More drink means more happiness…” That’s when Mathai went to pick up his glass and the brandy bottle. It was only morning still. Annamma, his wife, had gone to school as usual to teach Gen Z, an intractable generation. Mathai had retired from a cooperative bank where he was manager in the last few years of his service. Now, as a retired man, he took to watching the TV. It will be more correct to say that he took to flicking channels. He wanted entertainment, but the films and serial programs failed to make sense to him, let alone entertain. The news channels were more entertaining. Our politicians are like the clowns in a circus, he thought...

Stories from the North-East

Book Review Title: Lapbah: Stories from the North-East (2 volumes) Editors: Kynpham Sing Nongkynrih & Rimi Nath Publisher: Penguin Random House India 2025 Pages: 366 + 358   Nestled among the eastern Himalayas and some breathtakingly charming valleys, the Northeastern region of India is home to hundreds of indigenous communities, each with distinct traditions, attire, music, and festivals. Languages spoken range from Tibeto-Burman and Austroasiatic tongues to Indo-Aryan dialects, reflecting centuries of migration and interaction. Tribal matrilineal societies thrive in Meghalaya, while Nagaland and Mizoram showcase rich Christian tribal traditions. Manipur is famed for classical dance and martial arts, and Tripura and Arunachal Pradesh add further layers of ethnic plurality and ecological richness. Sikkim blends Buddhist heritage with mountainous serenity, and Assam is known for its tea gardens and vibrant Vaishnavite culture. Collectively, the Northeast is a uni...

Dine in Eden

If you want to have a typical nonvegetarian Malayali lunch or dinner in a serene village in Kerala, here is the Garden of Eden all set for you at Ramapuram [literally ‘Abode of Rama’] in central Kerala. The place has a temple each for Rama and his three brothers: Lakshmana, Bharata, and Shatrughna. It is believed that Rama meditated in this place during his exile and also that his brothers joined him for a while. Right in the heart of the small town is a Catholic church which is an imposing structure that makes an eloquent assertion of religious identity. Quite close to all these religious places is the Garden of Eden, Eden Thoppu in Malayalam, a toddy shop with a difference. Toddy is palm wine, a mild alcoholic drink collected from palm trees. In my childhood, toddy was really natural; i.e., collected from palm trees including coconut trees which are ubiquitous in Kerala. My next-door neighbours, two brothers who lived in the same house, were toddy-tappers. Toddy was a health...