Skip to main content

The Charm of Evil

Wolf Larsen as imagined by Gemini AI

Book Chat

“Good-bye, Lucifer, proud spirit.” Maud Brewster pays her tribute to the dying Wolf Larsen, protagonist of Jack London’s novel The Sea Wolf (1904). Wolf is not Larsen’s real name. He got that name because of his inhuman personality traits. Maud Brewster calls him Lucifer and he might as well be that proud but fallen angel.

Larsen lives totally outside normal human conventions. He is the captain of a ship named Ghost. It is a seal-hunting schooner. Larsen is an absolute dictator on the ship and the entire novel takes place on that ship except a couple of chapters towards the end. (And those few chapters are rather boring.)

Might is right for Larsen. He is a staunch follower of the Darwinian principle of survival of the fittest. Fitness, for Larsen, is physical and it has nothing to do with the intellect and least of all with morality. Morality is a mere human construct, he argues, made for the safety of the weak.

“Might is right, and that is all there is to it.” Larsen tells the narrator, Humphrey van Weyden. “Weakness is wrong.” Larsen is an intelligent and well-read man. He has a good collection of books with him, including Shakespeare, Milton, Nietzsche, and the Bible. He can quote even the Bible to prove that human life is nothing but evil. The biblical book of Ecclesiastes finds “life and the works of life all a vanity and vexation, an evil thing.”

Once you convince yourself that might is right and all the rest is either evil or meaningless, life becomes a brutish affair, which is what it is on the Ghost. Not one of the crew on the ship likes Larsen. The narrator, who is an eminent literary critic, lands on that ship purely by chance: a shipwreck from which Larsen’s men pulled him up.

Humphrey van Weyden, the narrator whom Larsen rechristens as Hump contemptuously, is the opposite pole of Wolf Larsen. He has a highly sophisticated mind so much so he is utterly helpless in the beginning, finding himself amid a bunch of brutes who have no sense of ordinary morality, let alone literature. He has to unlearn many of his earlier lessons in order to survive among them. He is fortunate to have Maud Brewster, writer, joining them later because of another shipwreck.

Eventually, Larsen is abandoned by everyone. Some mysterious illness renders him blind. His crew run away and save themselves presumably. Humphrey and Maud are left alone with Larsen who prevents them from using his ship for their further movement. Larsen wants to die in the sea, where he is now, in a desolate region of the ocean, far away from any human habitation, die all alone. He mocks Humphrey’s inability to shoot him though the latter is utterly frustrated with Larsen’s wicked ways.

“Hump,” Larsen says as Humphrey stands with a gun in his hand, “you can’t do it. You are not exactly afraid. You are impotent. Your conventional morality is stronger than you. You are the slave to the opinions which have credence among the people you have known and have read about.  Their code has been drummed into your head from the time you lisped, and in spite of your philosophy and of what I have taught you, it won’t let you kill an unarmed, unresisting man.” [Emphasis added]

The major conflict in the novel is precisely this: the power of physical might versus the powerlessness of moral refinement. Larsen represents the former and all his crew practise that style of life though they don’t intellectualise it as Larsen does. Humphrey and Maud show us the possibility of being moral even in an utterly immoral world. They have fictions, dreams, ideals, unlike Larsen who has, or believes in, only physical might.

Larsen is a charming character. He holds the reader in a spell right from the beginning of the novel to the last page. There are a few pages where he doesn’t appear and those are the most boring pages of the novel though what we get there is a budding romance between Humphrey and Maud on their newfound little island where there is no other creature.

Larsen is a charm. Evil is what makes him charming. Like Milton’s Satan, William Golding’s Roger, and Shakespeare’s Iago, Jack London’s Larsen will refuse to leave our consciousness long after we put the novel aside.

I finished reading The Sea Wolf yesterday. It was the second time I read the book. Larsen invited me to read the book again after a gap of some 5 years. I woke up at about 3 this morning feeling Larsen’s spirit haunting my memory, my consciousness. The charm of evil – that’s what haunted me. What makes evil so much more enchanting than goodness? [Look at history and much of contemporary politics and you’ll see how wicked people have been admired by too many men and an increasing number of women too.]

What makes evil so enchanting? My morning contemplation began.

Goodness is often passive, submissive, obedient. Evil, in contrast, rebels, takes action, challenges limits. As Larsen says, Lucifer “led a lost cause, (but) he was not afraid of God’s thunderbolts. Hurled into hell, he was unbeaten…. He straightaway incited man to rebel against God and gained for himself and hell the major portion of all the generations of man.”

Larsen goes on to argue that Lucifer was beaten out of heaven not because he was less brave than God or less aspiring. Lucifer was a free spirit, that’s why. “He preferred suffering in freedom to all the happiness of a comfortable servility. He did not care to serve God. He cared to serve nothing. He was no figurehead. He stood on his own legs. He was an individual.” [Emphasis added]

Wolf Larsen is precisely that individual. He defies both moral norms and nature. He forges his own code and asserts power unapologetically.

Secondly, evil characters are more psychologically complex. They struggle with inner contradictions, wrestle with morality or normal human ideals. This makes them more ‘human’ and interesting. Larsen is a brute, yet he is intelligent, philosophical, and introspective. He is a Nietzschean figure caught between reason and instinct. And his self-knowledge is amazingly clear.

Like other powerful evil creations in literature, Larsen possesses a unique charisma and eloquence. He has the best dialogues in the novel. And they seduce not only the other characters, but the reader too. His rhetoric is sharp, ironic, persuasive. Larsen is terrifyingly admirable.

Fourthly, evil represents freedom unlike goodness which is constrained – bound by duty, rules, morality. People like Larsen live more fully, more dangerously – as Nietzsche counselled to. They are the typical archetypal outlaws and outlaws possess a peculiar charm – the charm of what we cannot be though we’d like to be, to some extent at least!

Finally, goodness is boring. Evil creates all the drama. You can’t have a compelling narrative with all saints around. Throw in a devil amidst the saintly sadhus or monks and see what fun ensues.

That is why Maud Brewster pays a tribute to Larsen in the end though she had found him utterly repulsive throughout the novel. That is also why Larsen woke me up at three this morning and sent me into contemplation.

My previous posts on this novel:

·      The Charm of the Devil - 1

·      The Charm of the Devil - 2

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    I only ever read Call Of The Wild, feeling no compulsion to read further of Jack London. May have to give it a go. As ever, your review draws one in! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a review really. It's a classic published more than a century ago. I took a look at its major theme, that's all.

      Delete
  2. I've never been a fan of Jack London. I don't like wilderness stories. And in this case, ocean would be wilderness. I think the problem here is how you defined good and evil. Societal conventions don't make one good. The evil themselves don't believe in evil. They believe in power, and whatever it takes to gain power is necessary. This is shortsighted, but you'll never convince them of that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we won't ever succeed in showing the wicked where their error lies.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Missing Women of Dharmasthala

The entrance to the temple Dharmasthala:  The Shadows Behind the Sanctum Ananya Bhatt, a young medical student from Manipal, visited the Dharmasthala Temple and she never returned to her hostel. She vanished without a trace. That was in 2003. Her mother, Sujata Bhatt, a stenographer working with the CBI, rushed to the temple town in search of her daughter. Some residents told her that they had seen Ananya walking with the temple officials. The local police refused to help in any way. Soon Sujata was abducted by three men, assaulted, and rendered unconscious. She woke up months later in a hospital in Bangalore (Bengaluru). Now more than two decades later, she is back in the temple premises to find her daughter’s remains and perform her last rites. Because a former sanitation worker of the temple came to the local court a few days back with a human skeleton and the confession that he had buried countless schoolgirls in uniform and other young women in the temple premises. This ma...

Two Nuns and two questions

The nuns kept in custody  Two Catholic nuns were arrested on 25 July 2025 at Durg railway station for allegedly trafficking tribal women from Narayanpur in Chhattisgarh to Agra in UP. Today’s newspapers in Kerala have expressed their contempt of the act more vehemently than I had expected. It seems secularism has hope yet in this country. For those who are not aware of the incident, two nuns were arrested because some criminals of a depraved organisation called Bajrang Dal in Chhattisgarh chose to conclude that the nuns were committing the crime of human-trafficking. Since that charge wouldn’t stick, because the women confessed that they were going voluntarily to take up jobs with the help of the nuns in order to raise their families from miserable poverty in a country that claims to be a $5-tillion-economy, another charge was fabricated that the nuns had indulged in religious conversion. Now let us look at certain facts. Though I keep questioning the Christian churches for...

Capital Punishment is not Revenge

Govindachamy when Kerala High Court confirmed his death sentence The Bible suggests that it is better for one man to die if that death helps others to live better [ John 11: 50 ]. Forgive me for applying that to a criminal today, though Jesus made that statement in a benign theological context. A notorious and hardcore criminal has escaped prison in Kerala. Fourteen years ago he assaulted a young girl who was travelling all alone in a late evening train, going back home from her workplace. The girl jumped out of the running train to save herself from this beast. But he jumped after her and raped her. The postmortem report suggested that he raped her twice, the second being when she had already fallen unconscious. And then he killed her hitting her head with a stone. Do you think that creature is human? I wrote about this back then: A Drop of Tear For You, Soumya . The people of Kerala demanded capital punishment for this creature, the brute called Govindachamy. He is inhu...

Gods, Guns and Missionaries

Book Review Title: Gods, Guns and Missionaries: The Making of the Modern Hindu Identity Author: Manu S Pillai Publisher: Penguin Random House India, 2024 Pages: 564 (about half of which consists of Notes) There never was any monolithic religion called Hinduism. Different parts of India practised Hinduism in its own ways, with its own gods and rituals and festivals. Some of these were even mutually opposed. For example, Vamana who is a revered incarnation of Vishnu in North India becomes a villain in Kerala’s Onam legends. What has become of this protean religion of infinite variety and diversity today in the hands of its ‘missionary’ political leaders? Manu S Pillai’s book ends with V D Savarkar’s contributions to the religion with a subtle hint that it is his legacy that is driving the present version of the religion in the name of Hindutva. The last lines of the book, leaving aside the Epilogue titled ‘What is Hinduism?’, are telltale. “Life did not give Savarkar all he...