![]() |
Illustration by Copilot Designer |
I disabled Facebook on my phone yesterday. There’s too
much vulgarity, subhuman crudity, on it. And the first thing I read this morning
was a Malayalam weekly – Samakalika Malayalam from the Indian Express
group – whose editorial lamented the treatment meted out on social media to Dr
M Leelavathi, renowned Malayalam poet. Leelavathi refused to celebrate her 98th
birthday because she said she was distressed by the pictures of innocent
children dying of human-made hunger in Gaza. She was trolled by the Hindu right wing in
Kerala for saying that.
The editorial mentioned above
requests the “Hindutva handles” to leave alone Leelavathi. If Kerala’s beloved
poet and educationist was moved to tears by the sight of little children
behaving like insane creatures as soon as they espy some food, it only reveals
the deep humanity that sustained her poetry as well as her world vision.
The editorial went on to mention that
20,000 children were killed by Israel in the last 23 months. 30,000 are
seriously wounded. Prof Leelavathi said that all the children in the world are like
her own children. That reveals the magnanimity of her heart. If the Hindutva
people of Kerala are moved to so much hatred as to insult her with trolls and
crude comments, what is the standard of Hindutva? This is the question that the
editorial raises.
The dehumanisation and
desensitisation that is conspicuous in the social media are disconcerting. People
are viewed not as people anymore but as labels, stereotypes, or enemies. Historically,
genocides relied on this kind of dehumanising labels. First you reduce people
to certain labels such as ‘invaders’, ‘traitors’, ‘Jihadi’, ‘libtard’, ‘commie’,
etc, and then eliminate them using means like mob lynching or even governmental
measures.
Social media has no heart. It turns
images of bombings, killings, and poverty into memes. The pain of the victims
is thus trivialised. Memes throw a blanket over pain. Memes mock the victims indirectly.
Worse, graphic videos of fights and humiliation are converted into entertainment
on social media. Attacking the enemy is perceived as fun there. Violence
becomes entertainment.
The worst is perhaps the
normalisation of vulgarity. Crude jokes and insults flood the space. Civility
is out of place there. Everyone seems to be adapted to the very low standards
of discourse there.
When a government itself is
founded on hatred and an ideology that encourages genocidal actions, we cannot
expect rules to be implemented for containing this pathetic situation in the
social media. Maybe, those who run these media can implement an algorithm
reform. Instead of amplifying the vulgar and hate-filled comments and memes,
platforms could prioritise constructive engagement and balanced perspectives. I
hope those who run the various social media platforms wake up and do something
about this problem.
Hari Om
ReplyDeleteIndeed, there is a reason I have very limited communications tools that I use.
It is a peculiarity of the human psyche that we look for tribes to which we can belong. As is the case 'in real life', online it is the loudest voices who are dominant. Anger which starts out as being minimal and centred only on the individual's life is given ground on which to grow and twist. Tropes become the language without any true belief, because it suits the lazy thinking that so many prefer. We look for those who we can emulate, regardless of morals. To follow a higher level of behaviour, to rise above the crowd, takes courage and effort. Heaven forbid we should tire ourselves out swimming against the tide... and anyway, I can hide behind the ether and let loose my venom, getting my cheap thrills...
This is the mentality now. Deplorable. YAM xx