Skip to main content

The Politics of Change



“… there are times when the world is in flux and the right voice in the right place can move the world.  Thomas Paine and Ben Franklin, for instance.  Bismarck.  Lenin.”  [Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card]

The most repeated refrain at my workplace now is “change.”  The focus is always on change from within.  We’ve had a number of “workshops” on the theme.  A lot of Stephen Covey has been shoved down the throats of the participants.  The latest “workshop” ended a couple of hours back.  The participants were enlightened on the 90 / 10 principle of Covey, according to which we cannot change 10 percent of the reality because that is not under our control, but we can change the remaining 90 percent because that is related to our response to the reality.  For example, if my little daughter topples the coffee cup on to my shirt during breakfast, I can choose to let out my ire first on my daughter, then on my wife for being careless about where she placed the cup, then on my car for not being fast enough... end up paying the fine for over-speeding and then making a mess of everything at the office.  OR, I can choose to offer a gentle advice to the girl, change my shirt and proceed coolly, and be a winner.

Well, the choice is about my response to the situation.  So far so fine.  I wouldn’t disagree much.

The expert proceeded to argue that the real change should always be “from within.”  I raised a doubt that if everyone was working on changing themselves from within, the system might never change.  A corrupt political system like the one we have in our country, which propelled the formation of the Aam Aadmi Party, will flourish...

The answer given by one of the participants is that it is we who choose our leaders.  So Covey’s theory is valid: we change our choice of the leaders.  Ha!  I sat wondering how many leaders of my choice exist in the 600-odd political parties in our country.

A more logical answer, I think, would be that even the leaders should change themselves from within.  Wow!  That would be fantastic.  Fantastic, indeed.
 
After the workshop, one of the participants asked me: “What if I change and become the ideal person, and quite many others refuse to change and remain selfish, greedy, jealous...?  Won’t I end up being exploited by them?”

“Why didn’t you ask the question in the workshop?” I asked.

Not one participant had cared/dared to raise his/her hand when the expert asked them whether anyone of them would agree with my view that Covey’s theory was not applicable at the macro level.   

I think Covey’s theory is as good as the Communist principles or the teachings of the Buddha or Jesus or Confucius... If the whole world is willing to change from within, the outcome will be a paradise on earth.
 
But how many people will actually change from within?  My colleague’s fear (above) is extremely relevant.

I’m more inclined toward practical solutions.  That’s why I began this article with a quote from Ender’s Game.  The novel is about a battle school.  I haven’t even read half of it yet.  But I don’t mind applying the metaphor of ‘life as a battle’ to our day-to-day existence.  We can take all the inspiration possible from religions, psychology, or any other source.  But, in the end, we live in the world of the gazelles and the lions celebrated in an African saying (quoted below), according to which the only real option available to both the gazelle and the lion is: start running if they want to survive.  The lion has to run to catch its prey, and the gazelle has to run to escape from the predator.  [An interesting post on a theme very related to this is Raghuram’s latest one: Innocence Undefined.  By the way, it is Raghuram who couriered me his copy of Ender’s Game.  I wouldn’t read this science fiction had he not taken the trouble of forcing it on me.]

The world of human beings isn’t much different (claims to pure vegetarianism, notwithstanding).  Here too, survival is a struggle for many.  A Ben Franklin, a Tom Paine, a Lenin, a Gandhi... will be required once in a while to speak the right word at the right time.  If I may recall Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a cry in the wilderness is known to have started an avalanche.

Allusion:
 “Every morning in Africa, a Gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a Lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest Gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you are a Lion or a Gazelle... when the sun comes up, you'd better be running.”

Comments

  1. Wow.. that is one intelligent post.. I agree with you Matheikal.. but i believe a should bring the change that our conscience impels us to bring.. life is a journey towards actualization of the self and about being the best person that you can become.. In the end, what matters is how i fared, not how everyone else fared... if we keep thinking about other, nobody will change.. world will become a jungle where survival is the only motivation.. i believe there is more than that about being humans.. thanx for the post.. i loved this one.. some intelligent thoughts very well written..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Deepak.

      I too think that there is more to humans than the mere instinct for survival. That's why we have moral, social, political and religious systems. In spite of them, we have much - too much, in fact - evil too. So we have the onus of searching for effective solutions. I'm just thinking loud...

      Delete
  2. “What if I change and become the ideal person, and quite many others refuse to change and remain selfish, greedy, jealous...? Won’t I end up being exploited by them?”

    I am confronted by this question, at the most trivial level, everyday, as I ride the Delhi Metro. I proceed to the doors of the train unhuriedly (like the gazelle that is not trying to run the fastest it can)and I hardly ever miss boarding the train. Whether I jostle / push my way through the crowd or not, it is nearly certain that I will not get a seat no matter I rush or I amble to the the door. This is when I ask, am I allowing myself to be exploited. Even when I answer yes, I ask is this anything significant? I invariably say no. What I mean is, at the higher levels of exploitation (as defined by one's own threshold) the survival instinct takes over. It is in the gradual increase in the threshold level, FOR EVERYONE, that will ultimately reduce the level of exploitation (discounting the few black swans).

    By the way, I DIDN'T forec the book on you :) I did not reveal what I was sending you because of two things. One, I was worried that you will cite your workload and ask me not to loan the book to you, and I was keen on you reading it. Two, I am averse to calling any book as belonging to the Sci-Fi genre, because I think the genre is false, does not exist. I wanted to discuss / argue on that with you, after you read the book.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The person who asked that question about being the ideal person is the dearest one to me. I wish she she had raised the question in the workshop. I wish she raises herself to that survival level!

      The rest doesn't [don't (?)]matter to me.

      I have finished reading the book you sent me. I enjoyed it at a very different level, not as fiction. Yes, Raghuram, there indeed is a difference between real literature and the rest. I can discuss this at some other time.

      I hope to write on Ender's Game soon.

      Delete
  3. Oh that Stephen Covey, 'the author of the 7-habbits of highly effective people'. He was a great motivator for corporate business.

    If you read the book,( I have not read the book but on the book), he is excellent. But my concern is what is he doing in the system of Indian education? As far as my knowledge about the Indian society is concerned, it is highly unlikely that he fits into there. Yes change is the key basic word.

    But individual changes should function in unison with the national changes. In a nation built still on lies, corruption, croon-ism, feudalism, imperialism, it makes me laugh how Covey can be accommodated.

    And your story, well, I see little relevance to that in education. The model of education cannot be the one derived from model of plant kingdom or animal kingdom:)

    Well, I am sure you know by now, very well about Covey, yet I am adding a summary of his 7-habbits.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-coveys-7-habits-of-highly-effective-people-2012-7

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm familiar with the 7 laws of Covey, the 7 laws of Deepak Chopra and the 10 commandments.

      I must thank you for one thing. One of my colleagues raised this same question that you're raising here in a slightly different way. He was met with derision. I think "workshops" have become a business in their own way.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...