I celebrated the onset of
the summer vacation watching Life of Pi
on Star Movies. I haven’t read the novel
and hence don’t know how far the movie is loyal to it. Experience has taught me that movies
generally do much injustice to written texts.
I liked the movie, however.
The tiger as well as the
other animals on the lifeboat may be an invention of Pi. Though he tells us another story replacing
the animals with human characters, he leaves us with the option of choosing
between the two tales, without ever telling us conclusively which the real
version is.
The film is a kind of
fable with a moral. Religions and gods
are as good as stories and myths in man’s attempt to discover meaning in life,
shows the movie. They are all
palliatives in times of anguish. Man
liberates himself from his pains by transmuting the pain into a narrative. Religion does the same thing in a slightly
different way. Perhaps, religion has the
added advantage in the form of omnipotent and omniscient god(s); gods who care
so much that they can incarnate in the form of a fish for the sake of a hungry
tiger or a god who can send his own son to suffer and die on a cross.
Pi believes that his tale
can lead others to god(s). God (let me
use the singular form for the sake of convenience) helps in dealing with trauma
of all sorts. God is a soothing balm, if
not a subliminal drug. God gives hope in
times of absolute despair. God makes
life meaningful when the going is the toughest.
God helps to keep the
enemy within us (the wild tiger or the rapacious hyena) under control. There is wild creature within all of us. We have to confront it and come to terms with
it if we are to live happily. Pi
confronts the tiger within himself, a creature that is wild and
untameable. He learns eventually various
strategies to keep the beast under control.
Finally the beast will leave him without as much as a grateful look, in
spite of all that he has done to keep it alive.
Pi could not have killed
the tiger; it was an integral part of himself.
It was his alter ego. It his
enemy that is within himself. He has
gained mastery over that enemy in the way that is possible: partial subjugation
and a lot of love.
Learning to love the wild
side within us is important if we are to love ourselves properly. When we fail to do that, we end up inflicting
others with the all viciousness of the brute.
I liked the movie and may
not read the novel. Perhaps, I won’t be
able to accept Yann Martel’s views on god and religion. While I accept the therapeutic value of
religion and god, I remain a non-believer.
Worse, I’m an agnostic in theory.
I understand that the novel is totally opposed to agnosticism because it
is noncommittal. Atheism is better
because it is assertive; it believes
that there is no god. Some belief, a
leap of faith, is far more valuable than being noncommittal, according to
Martel, as I understand.
The problem, here,
however, is that faith is not really one’s choice. I tried my best to believe but couldn’t. Yet I find myself drawn irresistibly to
religious figures like Jesus and the Buddha. I find Mahatma Gandhi’s view on religion much
more charming than his political views.
Myths hold much fascination for me.
But faith? No. That’s one of the aspects of the tiger within
me, I guess. I prefer to be honest to
myself and accept the tiger as my own.
I am strongly stringed with my faith. :) Our beliefs do mismatch. But my opinion regarding the animal within is very same as you or the movie. I sometimes get so upset regarding my negative face that I write melancholic poem expressing and cursing myself. It's so difficult to accept the beast inside when you know that it hurts those who you love. If we not accept it we cannot live in peace. I have experienced this.
ReplyDeleteBeing aware of the beast within is itself a great thing, Namrata. Coming to terms with it takes time. I speak from experience.
DeleteNever mind the disparity between our beliefs. Some of my best friends are deeply religious people. :)
We should always be aware of the animal within us and should know how to restrain the beast.
ReplyDeleteYes, Maniparna. Also love that beast! Otherwise the beast remains "the man within me who is angry with me," as a famous writer wrote.
DeleteThat's quite a refreshing outlook.While all of us latch on to good old dependable faith, you seem to be enthralled by the mysteries of myths.Interesting!
ReplyDeleteMystery, yes. You put it wonderfully well. I think I'm in love with the mystery of life.
DeleteI think the movie tells us about our capacity to tolerate what we have difficulty in believing. So the real story of Pi is on the boat with tiger. But if you want to hear a story that you could believe in, then the second story is for you.
ReplyDeleteYes, Pankaj, the movie is about creating a narrative in order to deal with the trauma of life. I think Yann Martel, the author, thinks that religion is a better narrative than fiction. That's where I differ. But personally I would accept the tiger story rather than the one with human characters. That's because I love myths.
DeleteLearning to love the wild side within us is important if we are to love ourselves properly. When we fail to do that, we end up inflicting others with the all viciousness of the brute. --- How could we do it practically, though I understand the point, sir. What is to be actually done to love the wild side within us? I may be really needing it. As usual, a blog - I mean, a movie review - with a different perspective.
ReplyDeleteIt's not a review, M. It's me raving as usual.
DeleteWhen I know I'm raving and I know I love my raving, I'm beginning to love myself.
When I think that I'm speaking words of wisdom when I'm actually raving and I don't know I'm not wise, I'm faced with a tiger.
Well... I think you will make me a Buddha.
ha..ha..! You are truly meditating. My daughter in some context gave you as an example for a calm and quiet, peaceful person. congrats!
ReplyDeleteThanks. I feel pride surging within.
Delete