Fascism
is an act of contempt. Albert Camus made
a detailed analysis of that contempt in his book, The Rebel. Conversely, said
Camus, “every form of contempt, if it enters politics, prepares the way for, or
establishes, fascism.”
Those
of us who are not victims of selective amnesia may remember certain mock-slogans
such as Hum paanch, humara pachees which
won the sloganeer tremendous popularity in the country. If from Mein
Kampf the road led straight to the gas chambers of Auschwitz, the mock
slogans of the country’s most eloquent orator have brought us to Dadri. Leaving aside a Nayantara Sahgal and an Ashok
Vajpeyi, the intellectuals in the country are lulled into stupor by the eloquent
contempt. Have we reached that stage
where – as in Camus’s analysis of
fascism – one leader, one people
translates into one master, millions of
slaves?
Finally
when the orator broke his silence on the issue he took recourse to the counsel
given by the President who is a soft-spoken man with no gift of the gab at
all. Why didn’t the orator declare his
own ideology? His own philosophy about
the plurality of the country’s culture and religions?
Hitler
did not have any clear set of principles or ideology, argues Camus. He was a man of action. Action alone kept Hitler alive, says
Camus. For him, to exist was to act. That is why Hitler and his regime needed
enemies. Bereft of a constructive
vision, the leader can only survive on hatred of the enemy and the constant
action it generates. The very meaning,
the purpose of existence, for such people is defined in relation to their
enemies.
Yet
the enemy has to be decimated too. The
regime moves from conquest to conquest, from enemy to enemy, until the empire
of blood and action is established. Or
else, the march ends in total defeat – as it happened in the case of Hitler.
As
long as the march is going on, it is only conquest, occasional setbacks
notwithstanding. Hitler used to tell his
generals that nobody was going to ask the victor whether he abided by truths or
not. Hermann Goring, one of Hitler’s
generals, repeated again and again during his trial that “The victor will
always be the judge, and the vanquished will always be the accused.”
The
guilt of the perpetrator of violence is shifted easily to the victim wherever
there are victors and the vanquished. “They
disrespected the religion of the majority.”
That’s the crime. You can see
that verdict in the umpteen comments made by readers below online newspaper
reports of the Dadri lynching and related issues. It doesn’t even matter whether the hapless
man had actually eaten what he had been accused of!
Even
if the man had eaten the food forbidden by the so-called majority, did he
deserve the kind of death he was awarded?
During Hitler’s heyday the Nazi newspapers proclaimed a “divine mission,”
namely, “to lead everyone back to his origins, back to the common Mother.” The
Germans were divided into we and they. ‘We’ became the cogs in the fascist machinery,
and they (those who did not belong to the common Mother) were viewed as the waste products to be dumped.
Let
us hope that our great leader, instead of relying on the feeble inspiration muttered
by the President, will use his eloquence to reunify the nation on a platform of
pluralism where even bovine metaphors can have different meanings to different
people as they ought to.
I know what you mean, I too was hoping for him to silence the media, our doubts and fears but none of that happened .. But I am hoping it is just a bunch on frustrated few trying to seek our attention and that the majority are living peaceful!!
ReplyDeleteI would like to share your optimism but can't. There are large forces at play. Some of them are not visible easily.
DeleteFascism has already set in India. Wait and Watch.
ReplyDeleteThanks,
Sekhar, DMR
Indeed, it has, and I'm watching...
DeleteThanks for your visit.
I find it all very disturbing. Mere words are not enough to reassure that India will uphold the principles of democracy and secularism. The perpetrators of bigotry and hatred need to be silenced by more than words.
ReplyDeleteThe leadership has to change and there's no other way. But who can replace the current leader? There's no alternative. We only hear voices in wildernesses.
Delete