Skip to main content

Nationalism is Treason


Professor Jie-Hyun Lim, Director of Research Institute of Comparative History and Culture (RICH) at Hanyang University in South Korea thinks that nationalism is “an act of treason.”  He also says it limits the capacity of imagination which is really why it is treason.

The only real purpose of nationalism is to gain power, argues the Professor. Mussolini, Hitler, Fransisco Franco of Spain and all other dictators used nationalism in order to consolidate their political power.  All of them divided the country into an in-group and an out-group.  Mussolini used culture to divide people while Hitler relied on race.  For Franco, the out-group consisted of those who did not speak Spanish language, the non-Catholics and the communists.  The in-group was characterised by the members’ loyalty to the nation coupled with a marked hostility towards other nations as well as the out-group irrespective of their nationality. The in-group was used by the leader to consolidate his own power.  Isn’t this happening in India now?

Nationalism is treason because it cannot solve any real problem.  It puts the nation on the back foot by diverting attention from practical solutions to abstract loyalty to the nation and its symbols.  For example, when the people of India struggle to extract their own money from the ATMs or their banks, they are told to suffer the agony comparing themselves with the soldiers fighting on the borders.  Nationalism becomes an excuse, a lame one, instead of finding solutions to the problem at hand.  This is a betrayal of the country if you look at it from the progress or development angle.  You want your countrymen to have better services.  Instead of addressing the problems related to the lack of services, the government machinery sells you nationalism.  Is it pro-nation?  Not at all.  On the contrary, it is anti-national in the sense that it is against the interests of the nation.  Yet, ironically, the one who is demanding what is in the interests of the nation gets portrayed and punished as anti-national!

Nationalism breeds narrow-mindedness.  It makes us think that our country, its culture or religion or language or whatever, is the best and others are detestable.  It makes us hate others without valid reasons.  It shrinks our vision and imagination.  It narrows down truths and the avenues to truths. 

We live in a world where cooperation has become more necessary than ever.  If the hole in the ozone layer above India is a result of what America is doing with its craze for the most sophisticated technology, it becomes the duty of America to cooperate with India to solve the problem.  Neither country can afford to rest conceitedly on its spirit of nationalism.

Our love for our country need not limit our love for others.  More importantly, it is silly to imagine that our culture or language or whatever is the best.  It is even more stupid to hate others on account of their culture and other contingent features.

Nationalism is on the rise in India these days.  A lot of people get branded as anti-national.  The simple truth is that these people who are branded as anti-national are far better human beings than the nationalists.  The simple truth is that nationalism does not serve any useful purpose in a country which is not dominated by any external force.  The simple truth is that India today does not need nationalism; it needs solutions to the manifold problems it faces.


Sadhvi Deva Thakur, one of our ideal Nationalists

Comments

  1. It is a good post. But I have the following problems:
    It could have been good had a difference between the below thing mentioned:
    1.There is a marked difference between Nationalism of the west and the Indian Nationalism which earned us independence which earned us independence. Former was driven by Aggrandizement but latter was inclusive....Now driven by right wing the former is making a comeback into India destroying the latter.
    2.There is a marked difference between Nationalism for our independence and Nationalism or MORE CORRECTLY FACISM of today....
    3.Because if we donot toe the line of todays fascists, they will brand us Anti national... But look at the conversations between GANDHI and TAGORE over SWADESHI movement..The latter was against it...but had the freedom to air his opinion...Tagore is such a class act and a cosmopolitan citizen.Or our nationalism had many strands..the Congress,Congress Socialist Party Revolutionary Terrorism, Hindustan Socialist Republican Party etc etc....

    And the so called nationalist of today were not even present back then...the right wing.....they are trying to appropriate it...

    It would have been better had u clearly mentioned that HITLER , MUSSOULINI followed fascism than nationalism....And today's neo liberal agenda driven by right wing in india is nothing but FACISM clothed in the form of nationalism....
    Thank You....
    But good post...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think we actually disagree on anything. I didn't intend to write a scholarly treatise on nationalism and hence didn't go into finer nuances and nomenclature. Fascism is not much different from the kind of nationalism we witness today and that's why I brought in the examples of Mussolini and Hitler.

      In the last para, I do speak about nationalism when confronted with an external force. That's what we had during the Independence Struggle and that was valid. Today nationalism has no relevance.

      Actually Professor Jie-Hyun Lim speaks about transnationalism which is what Tagore's cosmopolitanism in other words. Love your country and love others as well. Gandhi was of the same opinion as he mentions it clearly in his biography written by Louis Fischer.

      Anyway, my blog posts are meant to be very reader-friendly, not at all pedantic.

      Thanks for your views.

      Delete
    2. gangsofedathua @ sir i agree with ur view that what we are seeing today is fascism clothed up like nationalism.. but sir , can we really differentiate between what is nationalism and what is fascism ??? does the word called nationalism really exist ? in this era, i mean when we dont have any external aggressor on us what is the need of using the word nationalism .. and that too using it to create a divide between our own country men !!none of our freedom or national leaders talked about nationalism , they talked about collective force against an aggressor ( british ) i believe that fascism is nothing but an extended version of nationalism sir...

      Delete
    3. If you can differentiate between the present day nationalism and that during the freedom struggle, you will get the difference between fascism and necessary nationalism.

      Today in an independent country like ours nationalism has no relevance. It is used as a political tool for justifying certain evils perpetrated against certain people.

      Delete
  2. Intellectual anarchy is as bad as religious fundamentalism worse than political bigotary. Intellectual anarchy is a prejudiced and biased position against the fundamental principle of freedom of a society which stems from and rooted in individual freedom - the cornerstone of civilization.Intellectual anarchy is a negation of civilization and the negation of one's freedom and right to live.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My thoughts are absolutely in sync with those of yours Sir. The present government is propagating and selling (psuedo) nationalism to the people so that they remain intoxicated as they have been living under the intoxication of religion for ages and endure all kinds of suffering imposed on them under for the same of this so-called nationalism the same way they have been enduring in the name of religion since times immemorial.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts

Queen of Religion

She looked like Queen Victoria in the latter’s youth but with a snow-white head. She was slim, fair and graceful. She always smiled but the smile had no life. Someone on the campus described it as a “plastic smile.” She was charming by physical appearance. Soon all of us on the Sawan school campus would realise how deceptive appearances were. Queen took over the administration of Sawan school on behalf of her religious cult RSSB [Radha Soami Satsang Beas]. A lot was said about RSSB in the previous post. Its godman Gurinder Singh Dhillon is now 70 years old. I don’t know whether age has mellowed his lust for land and wealth. Even at the age of 64, he was embroiled in a financial scam that led to the fall of two colossal business enterprises, Fortis Healthcare and Religare finance. That was just a couple of years after he had succeeded in making Sawan school vanish without a trace from Delhi which he did for the sake of adding the school’s twenty-odd acres of land to his existing hun

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived

Octavian the Guru

Octavian was one of my students in college. Being a student of English literature, he had reasons to establish a personal rapport with me. It took me months to realise that the rapport was fake. He was playing a role for the sake of Rev Machiavelli . Octavian was about 20 years old and I was nearly double his age. Yet he could deceive me too easily. The plain truth is that anyone can deceive me as easily even today. I haven’t learnt certain basic lessons of life. Sheer inability. Some people are like that. Levin would say that my egomania and the concomitant hubris prevented my learning of the essential lessons of life. That would have been true in those days when Octavian took me for a farcical ride. By the time that ride was over, I had learnt at least one thing: that my ego was pulped. More than 20 years have passed after that and I haven’t still learnt to manage affairs in the world of people. That’s why I admit my sheer inability to learn some fundamental lessons of life. Th