Skip to main content

Hindu Tolerance



With unconditional respect to Durga Prasad Dash, I must say that his basic premise is wrong. “Are the non-aggressive, tolerant attitude of Hindus…” He starts.  Wrong, Sir. You are assuming that Hindus were non-aggressive and tolerant. 

Hindus were no less aggressive than any others.  We don’t need to go to the pre-Christian Ashoka who killed thousands of people in order to expand his kingdom and would have conquered China or Burma if the logistical situations hadn’t been as bad as they were.  I guess the Ashoka pillars in Kandahar didn’t appear there by a peaceful miracle.  No Sir, the Hindu kings were as belligerent as any others.  Kingship is all about conquests.  Even Lord Krishna would agree.  I’m sure, Durga Sir, you’re familiar with the vile things he did in order to win the Kurukshetra War.  I’m also sure you know about the wars and battles fought by our kings and princes throughout our history even before the Muslim invaders and the Christian colonisers came in. 

Durga Sir, those were the days of conquests.  I’m sure you know that England was conquered by the French in 1066.  In the same century the Muslims conquered North India.  Today in England, most of the landed nobility and the aristocracy are of foreign extraction though they may not admit it very openly.  We don’t have to go so far back in history, in fact, to understand conquests and annihilations.  Look at America.  Whose country was it before the Europeans invaded it as recently as the Taj Mahal was being built in our own Agra?

Conquest was the hobby of the ambitious in those days, Durga Sir.  They had no internet and its entertainments like blogging or Facebook.  Not even a democracy like we now have in which we can vote for somebody and get somebody else as our leader.  As Tennyson’s Ulysses says, it’s of no “profit” for an ambitious person to sit “idle” in the palace with “an aged wife” and a “savage” people. So they went around conquering.  Our very own Bharatiya kings did it too.  But our guys didn’t venture out too far.  Instead they killed those in the nearest kingdoms.  Like the Marathas making their killing in Gujarat or the Cholas in the Southeast Asia.

No, Sir. We were not at all tolerant.  Maybe we were incapable of venturing out beyond Kabul as Ranjit Singh managed to do.  But we always knew how to suppress people.  Our caste system, our Sati system and our devadasi system are enough to prove our intolerance, our cruelty which is more heartless than the conquests of the aliens.  The aliens subjugated the ‘others’.  We subjugated our own people.

The worst tragedy is that we continue to do the same thing even today.  Durga Sir, you put the Kashmiri Pandits in the same brackets with Sadhvi Pragya and Col Purohit.  My innards threw up when I saw this topic in Indipsire and I never imagined you had put it up.  I voted for it just to see who the blogger was who dared to insinuate so much.  I apologise to you, Durga Sir, for being so blunt.  I know no other way.  My emotions are deeper than those of the gau rakshak, the anti-Romeo squad as well as other new gen thugs in India.

Durga Sir, when you claimed that the Hindus in India are “victims of apathy, conspiracy and forced displacement in their homeland,” I was appalled.  What are you saying, Sir?  This country belongs to you.  It always did.  The Hindus were and still are the majority here.  Who displaced whom?  Teesta Setalvad says in her autobiography that nearly two lakh Muslims were displaced from Gujarat in 2002 when our beloved PM was the CM there.  Check the history of independent India, Durga Sir, and you will see how many people of which category were displaced from where.  A lot of Dalits have been displaced too.  Will you accept them in your fold, Sir?

I was shocked by the hashtag you gave: #hindusvictimised.  My god!  It has always been a country of the Hindus, hasn’t it, Sir?  80%.  And what have they made of the country?  Who are they blaming now?  The paltry 20%?  How silly, Sir? 

Okay, Sir.  Now you have a leader who can be another medieval conqueror.  Is such a conquest that you really want?  He did that in his own state.  Look at the condition of that state now.

I’m sorry, Durga Sir, if I hurt you.  I think you are intelligent enough to understand me.  If you don’t understand, you are welcome to shoot me.  I’ll stand before you bare-chested.


Comments

  1. Hindus were never victimised. The minorities are victimised. Religion do not bring in any attitude but groupism under the pretense of common faith brings in intolerance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for saying this loud. I always viewed myself as an Indian. I never cared for religious identity. But now I wonder what India is making me. I'm feeling ashamed of my country.

      Delete
  2. if hindu victimised then after cruel Mughals,Tughlaqs,Britishers why they survived today as 80% population, Durga's idea has left the nation divided in us vs they

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this divisiveness has an ulterior motive: to make India a Hindu Rashtra. Who will benefit by that is the next question.

      Delete
  3. Well, I don't know much about the history but in present, the case is not the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very few people will agree with you :(
      A lot of people, too many in fact, many of whom are well educated, think that India is at its best now.

      Delete
    2. Well, I feel pity for them. Einstein said, "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."

      Delete
  4. I am reminded of a famous saying - I disagree with what you say, but i will fight to the last for your right to say so. It is only good that many different opinions should come in any civilized discussion.
    So dear friend, I have a detailed response to the indispire topic on my blog https://durgadash.com/2017/05/03/dharmic-nature-of-aggression/.
    Thanks for putting forward powerful arguments in response to my suggested topic at Indispire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read your post. As you have already said, perceptions vary, opinions differ but as long as we are genuine there is no problem because we know how to respect each other's difference.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...

Coffee can be bitter

The dawns of my childhood were redolent of filtered black coffee. We were woken up before the birds started singing in the lush green village landscape outside home. The sun would split the darkness of the eastern sky with its splinter of white radiance much after we children had our filtered coffee with a small lump of jaggery. Take a bite of the jaggery and then a sip of the coffee. Coffee was a ritual in our home back then. Perhaps our parents believed it would jolt our neurons awake and help us absorb our lessons before we set out on the 4-kilometre walk to school after all the morning rituals at home. After high school, when I left home for further studies at a distant place, the ritual of the morning coffee stopped. It resumed a whole decade later when I completed my graduation and took up a teaching job in Shillong. But I had lost my taste for filtered coffee by then; tea took its place. Plain tea without milk – what is known as red tea in most parts of India. Coffee ret...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...