Skip to main content

Hindu Tolerance



With unconditional respect to Durga Prasad Dash, I must say that his basic premise is wrong. “Are the non-aggressive, tolerant attitude of Hindus…” He starts.  Wrong, Sir. You are assuming that Hindus were non-aggressive and tolerant. 

Hindus were no less aggressive than any others.  We don’t need to go to the pre-Christian Ashoka who killed thousands of people in order to expand his kingdom and would have conquered China or Burma if the logistical situations hadn’t been as bad as they were.  I guess the Ashoka pillars in Kandahar didn’t appear there by a peaceful miracle.  No Sir, the Hindu kings were as belligerent as any others.  Kingship is all about conquests.  Even Lord Krishna would agree.  I’m sure, Durga Sir, you’re familiar with the vile things he did in order to win the Kurukshetra War.  I’m also sure you know about the wars and battles fought by our kings and princes throughout our history even before the Muslim invaders and the Christian colonisers came in. 

Durga Sir, those were the days of conquests.  I’m sure you know that England was conquered by the French in 1066.  In the same century the Muslims conquered North India.  Today in England, most of the landed nobility and the aristocracy are of foreign extraction though they may not admit it very openly.  We don’t have to go so far back in history, in fact, to understand conquests and annihilations.  Look at America.  Whose country was it before the Europeans invaded it as recently as the Taj Mahal was being built in our own Agra?

Conquest was the hobby of the ambitious in those days, Durga Sir.  They had no internet and its entertainments like blogging or Facebook.  Not even a democracy like we now have in which we can vote for somebody and get somebody else as our leader.  As Tennyson’s Ulysses says, it’s of no “profit” for an ambitious person to sit “idle” in the palace with “an aged wife” and a “savage” people. So they went around conquering.  Our very own Bharatiya kings did it too.  But our guys didn’t venture out too far.  Instead they killed those in the nearest kingdoms.  Like the Marathas making their killing in Gujarat or the Cholas in the Southeast Asia.

No, Sir. We were not at all tolerant.  Maybe we were incapable of venturing out beyond Kabul as Ranjit Singh managed to do.  But we always knew how to suppress people.  Our caste system, our Sati system and our devadasi system are enough to prove our intolerance, our cruelty which is more heartless than the conquests of the aliens.  The aliens subjugated the ‘others’.  We subjugated our own people.

The worst tragedy is that we continue to do the same thing even today.  Durga Sir, you put the Kashmiri Pandits in the same brackets with Sadhvi Pragya and Col Purohit.  My innards threw up when I saw this topic in Indipsire and I never imagined you had put it up.  I voted for it just to see who the blogger was who dared to insinuate so much.  I apologise to you, Durga Sir, for being so blunt.  I know no other way.  My emotions are deeper than those of the gau rakshak, the anti-Romeo squad as well as other new gen thugs in India.

Durga Sir, when you claimed that the Hindus in India are “victims of apathy, conspiracy and forced displacement in their homeland,” I was appalled.  What are you saying, Sir?  This country belongs to you.  It always did.  The Hindus were and still are the majority here.  Who displaced whom?  Teesta Setalvad says in her autobiography that nearly two lakh Muslims were displaced from Gujarat in 2002 when our beloved PM was the CM there.  Check the history of independent India, Durga Sir, and you will see how many people of which category were displaced from where.  A lot of Dalits have been displaced too.  Will you accept them in your fold, Sir?

I was shocked by the hashtag you gave: #hindusvictimised.  My god!  It has always been a country of the Hindus, hasn’t it, Sir?  80%.  And what have they made of the country?  Who are they blaming now?  The paltry 20%?  How silly, Sir? 

Okay, Sir.  Now you have a leader who can be another medieval conqueror.  Is such a conquest that you really want?  He did that in his own state.  Look at the condition of that state now.

I’m sorry, Durga Sir, if I hurt you.  I think you are intelligent enough to understand me.  If you don’t understand, you are welcome to shoot me.  I’ll stand before you bare-chested.


Comments

  1. Hindus were never victimised. The minorities are victimised. Religion do not bring in any attitude but groupism under the pretense of common faith brings in intolerance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for saying this loud. I always viewed myself as an Indian. I never cared for religious identity. But now I wonder what India is making me. I'm feeling ashamed of my country.

      Delete
  2. if hindu victimised then after cruel Mughals,Tughlaqs,Britishers why they survived today as 80% population, Durga's idea has left the nation divided in us vs they

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this divisiveness has an ulterior motive: to make India a Hindu Rashtra. Who will benefit by that is the next question.

      Delete
  3. Well, I don't know much about the history but in present, the case is not the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very few people will agree with you :(
      A lot of people, too many in fact, many of whom are well educated, think that India is at its best now.

      Delete
    2. Well, I feel pity for them. Einstein said, "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."

      Delete
  4. I am reminded of a famous saying - I disagree with what you say, but i will fight to the last for your right to say so. It is only good that many different opinions should come in any civilized discussion.
    So dear friend, I have a detailed response to the indispire topic on my blog https://durgadash.com/2017/05/03/dharmic-nature-of-aggression/.
    Thanks for putting forward powerful arguments in response to my suggested topic at Indispire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read your post. As you have already said, perceptions vary, opinions differ but as long as we are genuine there is no problem because we know how to respect each other's difference.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...