Skip to main content

Floods and the Gods



The god I was given in my childhood was too eager to punish. His impatience with mankind is coeval with the species itself: he drove out the first couple from Paradise for eating the forbidden fruit. Why God planted that tree with the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden is one of the umpteen questions without answers when I confront my religion. Was it because God knew that Adam and Eve would break his rule and so he could punish them gleefully?

Soon after the first couple’s eviction from Paradise came the deluge, when Noah was 600 years 2 months and 17 days old [Genesis 7:11], which destroyed almost the entire creation because the biblical God lost his patience with his own creation. What a bad creator! And what a bad God to lose patience so promptly and so destructively!

He lost patience again and again. Fire and brimstone destroyed people whom he considered wicked. An incorrigible God!

When the disastrous deluge hit Kerala recently people of different religions and political affiliations invoked God once again to justify what happened. I came across a large number of religious people who explained the recent floods in Kerala as God’s punishment for man’s sins. A few of these religious people went to the extent of predicting bigger imminent disasters for the state.

I raised a question to one such holy man. Since god is omnipotent, can’t he alter the human nature so that god will have the kind of people he wants? A kind of genetic mutation which even human science can perform if it wants? Then there will be no evil. People will naturally choose goodness. Simple solution. Instead God keeps doing the same thing right from Adam’s time: punish. How foolish! [That holy man had no answer.]



I know the religious answers to this. They will immediately condemn my soul to hell. Who are you to question God’s wisdom and His ways? They ask me. I become a blasphemer. My place is the Hell, they decide.

I once told one such person who consigned me to Hell even before I died that the Hell would be a very boring place since all religious leaders will be there. But when a young student of mine raised a doubt about my stand, I asked her, “Do you really believe that your God is so cruel that He can only punish? And that too with eternal fire? Why don’t you discover something noble about your God? Why can’t your God be a loving entity, at least as loving as the people who do good to others?” That student is one of my fans today. I did something to her which her religion couldn’t do for years: make God meaningful.

I wish I could make God more meaningful to many more people. But I don’t believe in God and hence would find any discussion about that entity absolutely absurd. Students are a different matter, however. I can’t be cynical with them.

If anyone is ready to keep a student’s open mind, I can lead him/her to a better God. But Kerala doesn’t really have too much problem in this regard, I think. The people are cooperating with one another to bring life back to normalcy. I hope the people of Kerala will understand that it is not their god[s] who caused the flood. Maybe, the floods can make the people of Kerala introspect about what they have been doing to their own beautiful landscapes, rivers and lakes. In the process, they may discover a benign god too.


Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

Comments

  1. No so-called Holy man or any (apparently) religious person can answer to these questions because the questions themselves contain the (obvious) answers within them. I also know a (considered by himself as well as others) Holy man who was once a teacher. He never gave importance to the fact that I had immense faith in the ethical values and virtues of life though not in any invisible entity termed as God (or Bhagawan or Eeshwar or Khuda or the like wise). Being truthful or honest or benevolent isn't considered worthwhile, the only worthwhile thing is to show faith in God and show respect (showing is important) to the things (temples, pilgrimages, idols, scriptures etc.) associated with Him. Who cares for ideals when doing all kinds of evil things in the name of God or religion can be justified ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can understand the authenticity and depth of your feelings from the intensity of your expression. It's so painful to realise that the ultimate purpose of religions is not truthfulness or any such virtue but mere show-off which eventually brings certain material rewards.

      Delete
  2. To be honest, what I have felt is that the religious people are sad that it was only a small disaster that took place. There is a part in bible.
    Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them--do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem?
    If it what the religious people say then why didn't a politician, or a rapist, or any of the religious leaders who torment the bhakts die? Why is the only the layman who steals rice for his hunger had to die.
    Or is god finally a hypocrite. As far as I've seen not a priest came forward with this conclusion of sinners. It is this bhakts who exploits the religion and says they have foresight and all things made this blunder. I feel pity for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Jojo, there are many religious people, including a famous Bible Convention preacher whom you know, who have predicted the imminence of the Doomsday. This preachers has apparently asked devotees not to attend even Conventions or retreats now but just sit and read the Bible and pray because everything else is futile now that the world is going to end.

      The Church in Kerala cannot accuse the laity anymore since the priests are facing serious criminal charges.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...