Skip to main content

Floods and the Gods



The god I was given in my childhood was too eager to punish. His impatience with mankind is coeval with the species itself: he drove out the first couple from Paradise for eating the forbidden fruit. Why God planted that tree with the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden is one of the umpteen questions without answers when I confront my religion. Was it because God knew that Adam and Eve would break his rule and so he could punish them gleefully?

Soon after the first couple’s eviction from Paradise came the deluge, when Noah was 600 years 2 months and 17 days old [Genesis 7:11], which destroyed almost the entire creation because the biblical God lost his patience with his own creation. What a bad creator! And what a bad God to lose patience so promptly and so destructively!

He lost patience again and again. Fire and brimstone destroyed people whom he considered wicked. An incorrigible God!

When the disastrous deluge hit Kerala recently people of different religions and political affiliations invoked God once again to justify what happened. I came across a large number of religious people who explained the recent floods in Kerala as God’s punishment for man’s sins. A few of these religious people went to the extent of predicting bigger imminent disasters for the state.

I raised a question to one such holy man. Since god is omnipotent, can’t he alter the human nature so that god will have the kind of people he wants? A kind of genetic mutation which even human science can perform if it wants? Then there will be no evil. People will naturally choose goodness. Simple solution. Instead God keeps doing the same thing right from Adam’s time: punish. How foolish! [That holy man had no answer.]



I know the religious answers to this. They will immediately condemn my soul to hell. Who are you to question God’s wisdom and His ways? They ask me. I become a blasphemer. My place is the Hell, they decide.

I once told one such person who consigned me to Hell even before I died that the Hell would be a very boring place since all religious leaders will be there. But when a young student of mine raised a doubt about my stand, I asked her, “Do you really believe that your God is so cruel that He can only punish? And that too with eternal fire? Why don’t you discover something noble about your God? Why can’t your God be a loving entity, at least as loving as the people who do good to others?” That student is one of my fans today. I did something to her which her religion couldn’t do for years: make God meaningful.

I wish I could make God more meaningful to many more people. But I don’t believe in God and hence would find any discussion about that entity absolutely absurd. Students are a different matter, however. I can’t be cynical with them.

If anyone is ready to keep a student’s open mind, I can lead him/her to a better God. But Kerala doesn’t really have too much problem in this regard, I think. The people are cooperating with one another to bring life back to normalcy. I hope the people of Kerala will understand that it is not their god[s] who caused the flood. Maybe, the floods can make the people of Kerala introspect about what they have been doing to their own beautiful landscapes, rivers and lakes. In the process, they may discover a benign god too.


Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

Comments

  1. जितेन्द्र माथुरAugust 22, 2018 at 8:40 AM

    No so-called Holy man or any (apparently) religious person can answer to these questions because the questions themselves contain the (obvious) answers within them. I also know a (considered by himself as well as others) Holy man who was once a teacher. He never gave importance to the fact that I had immense faith in the ethical values and virtues of life though not in any invisible entity termed as God (or Bhagawan or Eeshwar or Khuda or the like wise). Being truthful or honest or benevolent isn't considered worthwhile, the only worthwhile thing is to show faith in God and show respect (showing is important) to the things (temples, pilgrimages, idols, scriptures etc.) associated with Him. Who cares for ideals when doing all kinds of evil things in the name of God or religion can be justified ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 22, 2018 at 9:46 AM

      I can understand the authenticity and depth of your feelings from the intensity of your expression. It's so painful to realise that the ultimate purpose of religions is not truthfulness or any such virtue but mere show-off which eventually brings certain material rewards.

      Delete
  2. none to be knownAugust 22, 2018 at 8:55 AM

    To be honest, what I have felt is that the religious people are sad that it was only a small disaster that took place. There is a part in bible.
    Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them--do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem?
    If it what the religious people say then why didn't a politician, or a rapist, or any of the religious leaders who torment the bhakts die? Why is the only the layman who steals rice for his hunger had to die.
    Or is god finally a hypocrite. As far as I've seen not a priest came forward with this conclusion of sinners. It is this bhakts who exploits the religion and says they have foresight and all things made this blunder. I feel pity for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 22, 2018 at 9:50 AM

      Yes, Jojo, there are many religious people, including a famous Bible Convention preacher whom you know, who have predicted the imminence of the Doomsday. This preachers has apparently asked devotees not to attend even Conventions or retreats now but just sit and read the Bible and pray because everything else is futile now that the world is going to end.

      The Church in Kerala cannot accuse the laity anymore since the priests are facing serious criminal charges.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...
39 comments
Read more

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...
30 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...
24 comments
Read more