There were intelligent seekers
of truth even in India as far back in history as seventh century BCE. One such school
was Charvaka whose doctrine was known as Lokayata. Very little information
about them has survived to our day. No copy of their central text, the Brihaspati
Sutra, which dates from 600 BCE, is available now. It is assumed by historians
that the Lokayata texts were systematically destroyed by the Brahmins whose
authority was questioned by these texts. But, rather ironically, the works
which argued against the Lokayata texts were preserved and thus we have
sufficient information about this rebellious doctrine.
The adherents of this
doctrine, the Charvakas, rejected life after death. They considered such beliefs
funny. Thinking and feeling are part of our physical system and in the due
course of time they wear out and die. Nothing is left to live on after death. The
ancient play, The Rise of the Moon Intellect, has a character who ridicules
religious believers as “uncivilised ignorant fools” who expect fruits to hang
from trees growing in air. This character supported the Lokayata doctrine.
Truth is obvious, according to
Lokayata. You can perceive it through your senses or reason. Entities like gods
are creations of the imaginations of crooked people whose intention is to
deceive others.
The Charvakas thought of the
ascetic’s approach to life as sheer waste. We have just one life, this one here
on earth. It is our duty to enjoy it as much as possible.
The Charvakas were highly critical
of religious approaches to life. They considered the Vedas as fraudulent. The
Vedic faith in a higher system of justice was particularly questioned by this
school. The Vedas cheat people, according to Lokayata, by imposing absurd rituals
on them. There are some interesting arguments given by the Charvakas. The Vedas
say that the animals slain in religious sacrifices will ascend to heaven. If
people really believed that, surely they would sacrifice their parents and thus
give them an express ride to paradise.
Lokayata obviously did not
believe in gods or heaven. They believed in hell which, they insisted rather
gleefully, is here below. We create the hell with our actions and frustrations
mostly. If we exercise our intellect properly, we will do things to avoid pain
and increase pleasure. Virtue belongs to the intelligent, in other words.
Religion is both foolish and
fraudulent. The Sarva-darsana-samgraha cites the Charvakas as saying that the Vedas
are “tainted by the three faults of untruth, self-contradiction, and tautology.”
The Charvakas ridiculed the Brahmins as people who used religion as a means of
livelihood. Death was the best for them. There are so many ceremonies
associated with death.
*
Interestingly, Lokayata and
its adherents did not survive for long. What they considered irrational, absurd
and ridiculous survived and flourished. Why? This is what Lokayata should make
us wonder about. Why do we still – nearly three millennia after the Lokayata
doctrine – keep killing people for the sake of divine entities whose existence
is not even certain? Why are we so irrational and absurd though we keep
claiming that we are rational and capable of great wisdom?
This is something that has baffled
me for years. In the autumn of my life, I am still left with this enigma. In a
very enlightening book titled Doubt, the author Jennifer Michael Hecht
makes a very interesting observation. “People throughout the ancient world had
argued that a thinking person could be happy and moral without God or gods, but
most of them worried about what the average man or woman would do, and feel,
without religion.” Doesn’t that imply that religions and their gods belong to
the mediocre? Well, I’m not arrogating intellectual superiority to myself and
other doubters. But I’d like to leave that question to all those who go around
peddling gods even using the electronic media.
PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z
The previous posts in this series can be read here.
Tomorrow: Murderer
Enjoyed reading this post! Had heard/read about the "Charvakas" somewhere but this post was very informative.
ReplyDeleteThe Charvakas are not much liked by people even today. I don't accept their materialism totally. But i find them very tickling.
DeleteCharvakas seem interesting i so far as they challenged the existing belief systems. Though i have read about them here i will definitely be reading further.
ReplyDeleteDeepika Sharma
Not much is available on them. But whatever is there is interesting.
DeleteI hadn't heard about charvakas. It is sad that there is no reading material available around their beliefs
ReplyDeleteIt's always difficult for dissenting groups to survive being pitted against dominant religious powers. The situation isn't any different even today.
Delete"We create the hell with our actions and frustrations mostly. If we exercise our intellect properly, we will do things to avoid pain and increase pleasure. Virtue belongs to the intelligent, in other words."
ReplyDeleteThis is so true! I hadn't heard about charvakas but after reading Sapiens I can relate to their theory that your post highlights. Maybe the answer to why it is so is because that was an easy way to control groups as said in Sapiens.
It'd be really hard to control people without gods and their eternal punishments, etc.
Delete