Lewis Terman is a psychologist who put a high premium on intelligence. “There is nothing about an individual as important as his IQ, except possibly his morals,” he declared fervidly. He carried out a lifelong research on certain highly gifted children continuously until they grew up into adulthood. His research is the longest-lasting longitudinal study ever conducted.
In 1921, Terman sent a team of fieldworkers to
California’s elementary and high schools with the mission of finding out the
brightest students. Intelligence tests were conducted on the students suggested
by the teachers. The top ten percent of the candidates were given another IQ
test. Those who scored above 130 in that second test were administered a third
test. Thus Terman selected the most intelligent students of California, no less
than 1470 of them.
These students, who came to be known as Termites, were
monitored constantly as they grew up. They were tested at regular intervals,
the results were analysed, and guidance was given. Their educational progress,
married life, illnesses, psychological health and job records were all followed
up meticulously. They were the most precious individuals in California as far
as Terman was concerned.
Terman was convinced that the IQ geniuses would produce
our great leaders in every field – arts, science, government, education and
social welfare. He was delighted whenever his proteges went on to win various
competitions.
Finally, after years of study, the records of 730
adult Termites were assessed. The top 20% were true success stories. They
became eminent lawyers, physicians, engineers and academics. The middle 60%
were just “satisfactory”. The bottom 20% did as well as any Tom, Dick and
Harry. They were postal workers, struggling bookkeepers, or something as
ordinary as that. A few of them were even jobless. One-third of them had
dropped out of college. One-fourth had not gone beyond high school. Yet they
had outstanding IQs as children.
Terman’s first premise stood disproved. He realised
that intelligence alone was not enough for success in life. Further studies
showed that success required many other ingredients like supportive parents,
conducive social environment, and personality traits.
Christopher Langan had an IQ of
195. You may recall that Albert Einstein’s IQ was 150. “The smartest man in
America.” That is how the TV anchor of the show One versus One Hundred
introduced Langan to the audience in 2008. Langan was the guest at the reality
show in which he had to outsmart 100 intelligent adversaries to win up to a
million dollars.
Questioned by the host of the show about his high IQ,
Langan said, “Actually, I think it (high IQ) could be a hindrance. To have a
high IQ, you tend to specialise, think deep thoughts. You avoid trivia.”
Langan’s high IQ took him to many TV shows and other
programmes. One such TV show once hired a neuro-psychologist to give Lancan an
IQ test, and Lancan’s score was off the charts – too high to be accurately
measured. Langan could read and understand academic books faster than anyone. “He
got a perfect score on his SAT, even though he fell asleep at one point during
the test,” says Malcolm Gladwell in his book, Outliers.
What did Christopher Langan, the genius with the
highest IQ in the world, become in life? A horse rancher. Yes, that is what he
is today. He lives in rural Missouri on a horse farm. “I don’t think there is
anyone smarter than me out there,” he told Malcolm Gladwell when they met a few
years ago. That sounded boastful but in fact the man was defensive, says
Gladwell. “Here … was a man,” writes Gladwell, “a man with a one-in-a-million
mind, and he had yet to have any impact on the world. He wasn’t holding forth
at academic conferences. He wasn’t leading a graduate seminar at some
prestigious university. He was living on a slightly tumbledown horse farm…
sitting on the back porch in jeans and a cutoff T-shirt. He knew how it looked:
it was the great paradox of Chris Langan’s genius.”
Langan didn’t know how to navigate the world of
ordinary people. His high IQ made him unsuitable for that world. Gladwell says
that Langan’s family background didn’t help any bit to make life easy for him.
He belonged to a broken family and went through a lot of misery. That matters
much however high your IQ is.
No one rides to the cliff of success alone. “Not rock
stars, not professional athletes, not software billionaires, and not even
geniuses,” says Gladwell. Some social skills are essential for success
anywhere. And some luck too – in the form of family background, opportunities,
and so on. There may be exceptions, of course. But the general rule is that
intelligence alone is not enough if you want to be a success. The world actually
belongs to the mediocre.
PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z
Read the previous parts of this series below:
A: Absurdity
D: Delusions
Yes, a combination of factors contribute to success. Informative post.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
DeleteLike the case of Langan very high intelligence can be a curse. Then we measure intelligence only in terms of logical capability. IQ tests are mostly about left brain activities. A broader definition should include capacities to adapt in every social situation. Even talents in physical activities like sports or right brain activities like music should also be part of intelligence tests.
ReplyDeleteHoward Gardner did that. He speaks about 9 types of intelligence. But this post was written in order to examine the emphasis usually laid on IQ.
DeleteYes, very true. That reinstates the fact most of the top rank holders and child prodigies vanish into obscurity after a point of time, as they dont know how to tackle the real world
ReplyDeleteThere's something that psychology labels as practical intelligence. Without that, high IQ can be a curse.
DeleteYou have highlighted a very important aspect but sadly our education system just focuses on only increasing IQ level. Nothing else.
ReplyDeleteIt's the assessment system that is the real problem. We keep assessing just one domain.
DeleteCompletely agree. High IQ alone is not enough to take one to the so called success that is recognized and is measured as per the societal definitions.It sure needs a lot of other factors to make it there.. And yes as you pointed out ..one out of those many other factors is luck!
ReplyDeleteMy Tomorrow's post takes another look at intelligence. Outliers.
DeleteWhat a powerful statement! The world actually belongs to the mediocre. I also feel that luck plays a significant role in one's life. To be at the right place at the right time certainly helps.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. The successful people won't agree but.
Delete