Skip to main content

Never trust a man who doesn’t drink

 


In James Crumley’s novel, The Wrong Case, one character gives this counsel: “Son, never trust a man who doesn't drink because he's probably a self-righteous sort, a man who thinks he knows right from wrong all the time. Some of them are good men, but in the name of goodness, they cause most of the suffering in the world. They're the judges, the meddlers. And, son, never trust a man who drinks but refuses to get drunk. They're usually afraid of something deep down inside, either that they're a coward or a fool or mean and violent. You can't trust a man who's afraid of himself. But sometimes, son, you can trust a man who occasionally kneels before a toilet. The chances are that he is learning something about humility and his natural human foolishness, about how to survive himself. It's damned hard for a man to take himself too seriously when he's heaving his guts into a dirty toilet bowl.”

I came across one of these self-righteous moralists on Facebook the other day. He got me blocked twice by reporting as silly a comment as my question to him whether his profile picture was really his photo. Below is his profile pic. Of course, everyone knows that a real ass – even one from Assam as this is – cannot be on Facebook where metaphorical ones abound.



It is one of this guy’s comments that drew my attention to him. It sounded moralistic. He sounded like one who thought of himself as India’s moral police, the knight in shining armour out to protect an ancient culture in danger now from all sorts of monsters like me. My question to him whether he was indeed the ass in the pic was only meant to deflate his moralistic balloon.

He has taken it upon himself to be India’s watchdog on FB. Look at some of his posts.




My curiosity and amusement were both raised when I stumbled upon his profile. I wanted to know a little more about him. So I provoked him. He got me blocked from Facebook instantly just for asking whether his profile pic was his own photo. OK. I came back when the block was over and provoked him once more very lightly suggesting that he could be India’s Messiah with all his redemptive ambitions. Soon his true colours were revealed. He downloaded a pic of my wife from my profile and posted it in the comment box saying his men would deal with her. That was too cheap if not cowardly. But that’s what he is: a cheap coward. I told him that. He removed the photo as well as the threat soon because he knew he would be in trouble otherwise. But he had already revealed the imbecile in him.

People like him who pretend to be nice citizens, nationalists, perfect guardians of public morality, are in fact nothing less than the meddling self-righteous judge that James Crumley’s character warns against. Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media or booze a little once in a while or even cock a snook at some pet theories of the moralists.

When any person sets up himself as the judge over others, an insane world is created. Hitler did just that. We have quite a few Hitlers in present India. Some of them are in very high positions while others occupy moral high thrones on social media. I wish all of them learnt to bend down before a toilet bowl once in a while. They need to. Very much.

PS. This blog is participating in The Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa campaign.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    You have to think of being online in exactly the same way as 'real life'... for example... I don't go to very many public places at all (even pre-COVID) because I know that the crowds (and the people who make them) are likely to give me the shudders, be that language, behaviour or just outright idiocy. I do (or did) attend art galleries and occasional small musical gatherings of classical and traditional variety.

    Therefore, online, I stick to blogging, where I can attend the galleries I wish to and linger where I choose without getting hassled by crowds. I avoid public houses and rock concerts in the form of FB and that phonebird thing. Those places where complete effwits like to lurk. (Of course there are such folk on blogging platforms, but 99.9% of the time one doesn't see them.)

    By not engaging with such as this, one avoids being pulled down to their level - or of being tarred with the same brush that the crowd draws to it.
    YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Generally I stay clear of these elements. But once in a while my intrinsic naughtiness gets the better of me. I'm very much like the guy who can kneel before the bowl once in a while feeling humble...

      But it's definitely better to stay far away from these elements.

      Delete
  2. I think it is great and if people who decide to pretend will pretend to be good on or offline.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha funny people on the internet! I have come across such asses in the past too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those comments are hilarious, no one can pretend to be something else, the reality get its way to peep out.

    Archana

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whoa!
    Misusing someone else's pictures has to be one of the biggest sins on social media.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I appreciate the thoughts expressed and the experiences shared. Like in the real world, in the virtual world too, it is (perhaps) a good option to avoid fighting with a pig because it makes you dirty whereas the pig enjoys it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Undoubtedly the best is to stay away from filth lest we get polluted. But I was too indignant to ignore this villain in a holier-than-thou motley.

      Delete
  7. Manisha - The virtual world isnt what its like actually shown most of the times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm aware of it too. In fact, I'm withdrawing myself from that space slowly.

      Delete
  8. You do enjoy provoking these people, don't you? I stay away; the abuse is too much for me to handle.
    In this case, I think, you should report to cyber crime. What he did is beyond cheapness. Most criminals are cowards. Who knows how many women he must be harassing on Facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't lost the adolescent mischief yet 😊

      He deleted the entire conversation as soon as he made that verbal assault. I couldn't take a screenshot. I also feel that he works with FB. He gets a lot of people blocked rather whimsically and too promptly.

      Delete
  9. I can relate to what happened to you. People specially on fb are emboldened to sy anything they please. I won't be surprised if none of their beliefs hold good in real world. I had posted a picture of an egg i not only overboiled but burnt. It was posted in good humour. You wouldn't believe how many dm i got trolling me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I wonder whether people don't have anything better to do.

      Delete
  10. I wonder why people spend so much time on social media and too wasting it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I cannot help but applaud you bravado. Too often we ignore such people, which in turn emboldens them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is a hilarious post. Personally, I do avoid such interactions. But anyway, once in a while, having fun at some one's expense is not a crime. :P

    ReplyDelete
  13. That quote is brilliant. And secondly, maybe while their head is inside the loo, they can also cough up their morality and flush it away? I think it'll benefit all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Most of the time Facebook and Twitter are just gutters, but occasionally they can be a good source of entertainment!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Beautifully structured post, you have described the incident really well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 'Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media'... I agree.. they're passive aggressive and like an explosion waiting to happen

    ReplyDelete
  17. Loved the reality in this post. Trolling and DM's are every one's part of life just ignore and get going.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hahahaha butt hurt

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...