Skip to main content

Never trust a man who doesn’t drink

 


In James Crumley’s novel, The Wrong Case, one character gives this counsel: “Son, never trust a man who doesn't drink because he's probably a self-righteous sort, a man who thinks he knows right from wrong all the time. Some of them are good men, but in the name of goodness, they cause most of the suffering in the world. They're the judges, the meddlers. And, son, never trust a man who drinks but refuses to get drunk. They're usually afraid of something deep down inside, either that they're a coward or a fool or mean and violent. You can't trust a man who's afraid of himself. But sometimes, son, you can trust a man who occasionally kneels before a toilet. The chances are that he is learning something about humility and his natural human foolishness, about how to survive himself. It's damned hard for a man to take himself too seriously when he's heaving his guts into a dirty toilet bowl.”

I came across one of these self-righteous moralists on Facebook the other day. He got me blocked twice by reporting as silly a comment as my question to him whether his profile picture was really his photo. Below is his profile pic. Of course, everyone knows that a real ass – even one from Assam as this is – cannot be on Facebook where metaphorical ones abound.



It is one of this guy’s comments that drew my attention to him. It sounded moralistic. He sounded like one who thought of himself as India’s moral police, the knight in shining armour out to protect an ancient culture in danger now from all sorts of monsters like me. My question to him whether he was indeed the ass in the pic was only meant to deflate his moralistic balloon.

He has taken it upon himself to be India’s watchdog on FB. Look at some of his posts.




My curiosity and amusement were both raised when I stumbled upon his profile. I wanted to know a little more about him. So I provoked him. He got me blocked from Facebook instantly just for asking whether his profile pic was his own photo. OK. I came back when the block was over and provoked him once more very lightly suggesting that he could be India’s Messiah with all his redemptive ambitions. Soon his true colours were revealed. He downloaded a pic of my wife from my profile and posted it in the comment box saying his men would deal with her. That was too cheap if not cowardly. But that’s what he is: a cheap coward. I told him that. He removed the photo as well as the threat soon because he knew he would be in trouble otherwise. But he had already revealed the imbecile in him.

People like him who pretend to be nice citizens, nationalists, perfect guardians of public morality, are in fact nothing less than the meddling self-righteous judge that James Crumley’s character warns against. Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media or booze a little once in a while or even cock a snook at some pet theories of the moralists.

When any person sets up himself as the judge over others, an insane world is created. Hitler did just that. We have quite a few Hitlers in present India. Some of them are in very high positions while others occupy moral high thrones on social media. I wish all of them learnt to bend down before a toilet bowl once in a while. They need to. Very much.

PS. This blog is participating in The Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa campaign.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    You have to think of being online in exactly the same way as 'real life'... for example... I don't go to very many public places at all (even pre-COVID) because I know that the crowds (and the people who make them) are likely to give me the shudders, be that language, behaviour or just outright idiocy. I do (or did) attend art galleries and occasional small musical gatherings of classical and traditional variety.

    Therefore, online, I stick to blogging, where I can attend the galleries I wish to and linger where I choose without getting hassled by crowds. I avoid public houses and rock concerts in the form of FB and that phonebird thing. Those places where complete effwits like to lurk. (Of course there are such folk on blogging platforms, but 99.9% of the time one doesn't see them.)

    By not engaging with such as this, one avoids being pulled down to their level - or of being tarred with the same brush that the crowd draws to it.
    YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Generally I stay clear of these elements. But once in a while my intrinsic naughtiness gets the better of me. I'm very much like the guy who can kneel before the bowl once in a while feeling humble...

      But it's definitely better to stay far away from these elements.

      Delete
  2. I think it is great and if people who decide to pretend will pretend to be good on or offline.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha funny people on the internet! I have come across such asses in the past too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those comments are hilarious, no one can pretend to be something else, the reality get its way to peep out.

    Archana

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whoa!
    Misusing someone else's pictures has to be one of the biggest sins on social media.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I appreciate the thoughts expressed and the experiences shared. Like in the real world, in the virtual world too, it is (perhaps) a good option to avoid fighting with a pig because it makes you dirty whereas the pig enjoys it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Undoubtedly the best is to stay away from filth lest we get polluted. But I was too indignant to ignore this villain in a holier-than-thou motley.

      Delete
  7. Manisha - The virtual world isnt what its like actually shown most of the times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm aware of it too. In fact, I'm withdrawing myself from that space slowly.

      Delete
  8. You do enjoy provoking these people, don't you? I stay away; the abuse is too much for me to handle.
    In this case, I think, you should report to cyber crime. What he did is beyond cheapness. Most criminals are cowards. Who knows how many women he must be harassing on Facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't lost the adolescent mischief yet 😊

      He deleted the entire conversation as soon as he made that verbal assault. I couldn't take a screenshot. I also feel that he works with FB. He gets a lot of people blocked rather whimsically and too promptly.

      Delete
  9. I can relate to what happened to you. People specially on fb are emboldened to sy anything they please. I won't be surprised if none of their beliefs hold good in real world. I had posted a picture of an egg i not only overboiled but burnt. It was posted in good humour. You wouldn't believe how many dm i got trolling me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I wonder whether people don't have anything better to do.

      Delete
  10. I wonder why people spend so much time on social media and too wasting it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I cannot help but applaud you bravado. Too often we ignore such people, which in turn emboldens them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is a hilarious post. Personally, I do avoid such interactions. But anyway, once in a while, having fun at some one's expense is not a crime. :P

    ReplyDelete
  13. That quote is brilliant. And secondly, maybe while their head is inside the loo, they can also cough up their morality and flush it away? I think it'll benefit all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Most of the time Facebook and Twitter are just gutters, but occasionally they can be a good source of entertainment!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Beautifully structured post, you have described the incident really well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 'Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media'... I agree.. they're passive aggressive and like an explosion waiting to happen

    ReplyDelete
  17. Loved the reality in this post. Trolling and DM's are every one's part of life just ignore and get going.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hahahaha butt hurt

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...