Skip to main content

Never trust a man who doesn’t drink

 


In James Crumley’s novel, The Wrong Case, one character gives this counsel: “Son, never trust a man who doesn't drink because he's probably a self-righteous sort, a man who thinks he knows right from wrong all the time. Some of them are good men, but in the name of goodness, they cause most of the suffering in the world. They're the judges, the meddlers. And, son, never trust a man who drinks but refuses to get drunk. They're usually afraid of something deep down inside, either that they're a coward or a fool or mean and violent. You can't trust a man who's afraid of himself. But sometimes, son, you can trust a man who occasionally kneels before a toilet. The chances are that he is learning something about humility and his natural human foolishness, about how to survive himself. It's damned hard for a man to take himself too seriously when he's heaving his guts into a dirty toilet bowl.”

I came across one of these self-righteous moralists on Facebook the other day. He got me blocked twice by reporting as silly a comment as my question to him whether his profile picture was really his photo. Below is his profile pic. Of course, everyone knows that a real ass – even one from Assam as this is – cannot be on Facebook where metaphorical ones abound.



It is one of this guy’s comments that drew my attention to him. It sounded moralistic. He sounded like one who thought of himself as India’s moral police, the knight in shining armour out to protect an ancient culture in danger now from all sorts of monsters like me. My question to him whether he was indeed the ass in the pic was only meant to deflate his moralistic balloon.

He has taken it upon himself to be India’s watchdog on FB. Look at some of his posts.




My curiosity and amusement were both raised when I stumbled upon his profile. I wanted to know a little more about him. So I provoked him. He got me blocked from Facebook instantly just for asking whether his profile pic was his own photo. OK. I came back when the block was over and provoked him once more very lightly suggesting that he could be India’s Messiah with all his redemptive ambitions. Soon his true colours were revealed. He downloaded a pic of my wife from my profile and posted it in the comment box saying his men would deal with her. That was too cheap if not cowardly. But that’s what he is: a cheap coward. I told him that. He removed the photo as well as the threat soon because he knew he would be in trouble otherwise. But he had already revealed the imbecile in him.

People like him who pretend to be nice citizens, nationalists, perfect guardians of public morality, are in fact nothing less than the meddling self-righteous judge that James Crumley’s character warns against. Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media or booze a little once in a while or even cock a snook at some pet theories of the moralists.

When any person sets up himself as the judge over others, an insane world is created. Hitler did just that. We have quite a few Hitlers in present India. Some of them are in very high positions while others occupy moral high thrones on social media. I wish all of them learnt to bend down before a toilet bowl once in a while. They need to. Very much.

PS. This blog is participating in The Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa campaign.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    You have to think of being online in exactly the same way as 'real life'... for example... I don't go to very many public places at all (even pre-COVID) because I know that the crowds (and the people who make them) are likely to give me the shudders, be that language, behaviour or just outright idiocy. I do (or did) attend art galleries and occasional small musical gatherings of classical and traditional variety.

    Therefore, online, I stick to blogging, where I can attend the galleries I wish to and linger where I choose without getting hassled by crowds. I avoid public houses and rock concerts in the form of FB and that phonebird thing. Those places where complete effwits like to lurk. (Of course there are such folk on blogging platforms, but 99.9% of the time one doesn't see them.)

    By not engaging with such as this, one avoids being pulled down to their level - or of being tarred with the same brush that the crowd draws to it.
    YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Generally I stay clear of these elements. But once in a while my intrinsic naughtiness gets the better of me. I'm very much like the guy who can kneel before the bowl once in a while feeling humble...

      But it's definitely better to stay far away from these elements.

      Delete
  2. I think it is great and if people who decide to pretend will pretend to be good on or offline.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha funny people on the internet! I have come across such asses in the past too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those comments are hilarious, no one can pretend to be something else, the reality get its way to peep out.

    Archana

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whoa!
    Misusing someone else's pictures has to be one of the biggest sins on social media.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I appreciate the thoughts expressed and the experiences shared. Like in the real world, in the virtual world too, it is (perhaps) a good option to avoid fighting with a pig because it makes you dirty whereas the pig enjoys it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Undoubtedly the best is to stay away from filth lest we get polluted. But I was too indignant to ignore this villain in a holier-than-thou motley.

      Delete
  7. Manisha - The virtual world isnt what its like actually shown most of the times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm aware of it too. In fact, I'm withdrawing myself from that space slowly.

      Delete
  8. You do enjoy provoking these people, don't you? I stay away; the abuse is too much for me to handle.
    In this case, I think, you should report to cyber crime. What he did is beyond cheapness. Most criminals are cowards. Who knows how many women he must be harassing on Facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't lost the adolescent mischief yet 😊

      He deleted the entire conversation as soon as he made that verbal assault. I couldn't take a screenshot. I also feel that he works with FB. He gets a lot of people blocked rather whimsically and too promptly.

      Delete
  9. I can relate to what happened to you. People specially on fb are emboldened to sy anything they please. I won't be surprised if none of their beliefs hold good in real world. I had posted a picture of an egg i not only overboiled but burnt. It was posted in good humour. You wouldn't believe how many dm i got trolling me

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I wonder whether people don't have anything better to do.

      Delete
  10. I wonder why people spend so much time on social media and too wasting it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I cannot help but applaud you bravado. Too often we ignore such people, which in turn emboldens them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is a hilarious post. Personally, I do avoid such interactions. But anyway, once in a while, having fun at some one's expense is not a crime. :P

    ReplyDelete
  13. That quote is brilliant. And secondly, maybe while their head is inside the loo, they can also cough up their morality and flush it away? I think it'll benefit all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Most of the time Facebook and Twitter are just gutters, but occasionally they can be a good source of entertainment!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Beautifully structured post, you have described the incident really well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 'Such people are far more dangerous than those who make some silly comments on social media'... I agree.. they're passive aggressive and like an explosion waiting to happen

    ReplyDelete
  17. Loved the reality in this post. Trolling and DM's are every one's part of life just ignore and get going.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hahahaha butt hurt

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...