Skip to main content

Enlightenment



Enlightenment is losing the world and gaining the universe. That doesn’t mean that you get out of the world as the ascetics in the Himalayas do. On the contrary, enlightenment takes you deep into the world. Enlightenment enables you to see the world more clearly. You see the connectedness between everything. Nobody is your enemy now.

Swami Vivekananda was an enlightened person.

Swami Vivekananda is often projected by India’s right wing as a champion crusader of Hinduism. His Chicago speech is cited as an example for his claims on the superiority of Hinduism. The truth, however, is that Vivekananda had an enlightened approach to reality. Let us look at his stand on Christianity for example.

Vivekananda translated The Imitation of Christ into Bengali. The Imitation is a Christian devotional book which gives practical guidelines on spirituality while it also serves as a meditation book. It is based entirely on the life of Jesus. In an article published in a special edition of The Frontline [8 Feb 2013] issued on the occasion of the 150th birth anniversary of Swami Vivekananda, Anantanand Rambachan wrote that The Imitation of Christ was the only text, other than the Bhagavad Gita, that Vivekananda kept with him while he travelled around in India after the death of his guru, Sri Ramakrishna.

Swami Vivekananda did not like the Christian missionaries for two reasons. One, they let down Jesus absolutely. Their life was an absolute antithesis of all that Jesus stood for. Two, their insistence that their religion was the only right path to spiritual truths and God.

What would Swami Vivekananda say seeing the present day ‘missionaries’ of Hindutva?

Swami Vivekananda liked The Imitation of Christ because of its emphasis on renunciation and its unabated thirst for purity. He compared the concept of self-surrender advocated by that book to the similar spirit exuded by the Gita. He was of the opinion that the teachings of Jesus had the spirit of Advaita in essence. When Jesus said, “I and my father are one,” he was expressing the Advaita concept of Aham Brahmasmi. The human and the divine are not different entities.

We may or may not accept Vivekananda’ s views. The point that this post is trying to make is that he did not oppose other religions in order to propagate Hinduism. Instead, he accepted whatever was good in other religions. He was an enlightened soul. Those who uphold his love for Hinduism nowadays need to delve deeper into his teachings and become enlightened.


PS.
 I'm participating in #BlogchatterA2Z 

Previous Post: The Desert Teaches

Tomorrow: Forest eats forest

 

Comments

  1. An enlightening post on enlightenment. As for example, I was not aware of the book " Imitation of Christ " and that it was very dear to Swami Vivekananda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad I could contribute this little bit of information. Sometimes small details like this can change whole perspectives.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Energising! Every word a gem. I am certain Vivekananda-ji would be Exceptionally Exasperated at current Events...

    As a point of interest, one of my favourite pastimes is to compare the Sermon on the Mount with Shruti Shlokas... I have no doubt at all that Yeshu spent is missing 14 years in study of a Hindu guru! YAM xx
    E=Eternalnot

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know whether Jesus was a disciple of an Indian guru. I have a book which 'proves' that Jesus died in Kashmir. Whatever that is, Jesus and all other genuine teachers were very open-minded about the paths to the divine. Their followers are just the opposite, more often than not.

      Delete
  3. Am aware of his teachings and quotes but didn't know about the imitation of Christ book. It's enlightening to know that he picked good from every religion. I also never felt he advocated a specific religion....like u said prophets teach well ..followers twist them

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is the real tragedy of prophets: they are misinterpreted and their teachings are manipulated.

      Delete
  4. Sometimes, I wonder why more 'well-read' people can't see the 'read to regurgitate' mode employed by all 'fanatics'. Perhaps, we're not reading anything deeply enough any more. Else, such accusations/ideas wouldn't stand a chance in sane society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I understand is that it's about politics rather than spirituality. People who misuse religion for political power do not want to understand religion.

      Delete
  5. He was a rational reformist too. He tried his best. He should have lived longer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. India lost him too early. Otherwise he would have made a bigger impact.

      Delete
  6. Swami Vivekananda was way ahead of his times! Can we ever have anyone like him, in today's chaotic India?

    I did not know about the book The Imitation of Christ. An enlightening post.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am in complete agreement with the thoughts expressed herein. Let me just add from my side that those who uphold his love for Hinduism nowadays will never delve into his teachings because they are relentlessly in search of historical figures (barring from the Nehru family) whose love for Hinduism (real or perceived) is to be upheld to further their vested interests. Skilled in distorting facts and figures (all meanings included), such people are already enlightened (as to what they want for themselves). They do not need any Vivekananda.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grandeur of the dooms

John Keats by William Hilton [Wikipedia] One of the poems included in CBSE’s class 12 English literature is an extract from Keats’ Endymion . A question that has come to me again and again from students as well as teachers is: What does “the grandeur of the dooms…” mean? It is a line that has perplexed me too. I have been amused by the kind of interpretations given in the guidebooks for students. Quite many of these books interpret the word ‘dooms’ to mean the Doomsday. Look at the following answer given in one such guidebook made available online by a well-known educational establishment.  That is very amusing considering the fact that Keats was an agnostic, if not a confirmed atheist. Keats would never accept a God who would come riding a majestic cloud on the day of the Last Judgment to apportion the good and the evil souls to Heaven and Hell. Evil is an integral part of life, Keats knew too well. No human can avoid evil any more than “a rose can avoid a blighting wind.” How...

Broligarchy

A page from Time Broligarchy is a new word I learnt from the latest issue of the Time magazine one of whose lead stories is titled ‘ American Broligarchy ’. Wikipedia teaches me that ‘broligarchy’ is “a neologism and portmanteau combining oligarchy and broism describing the rule of government by a coterie of extremely wealthy men (occupying leadership roles in the tech companies and tech-enabled businesses).” The Time article informs us that Trump’s greatest “bros” are Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, the three men who were given the most prominent seats, ahead of Cabinet members, at Trump’s Presidential inauguration. These wealthy businessmen play crucial roles in Trump’s way of governing America. They pump a lot of unregulated money into politics for their own selfish reasons. A menacing outcome is an unhealthy (for the public) expansion of presidential power with fewer checks on the Congress. The Time laments that this “would be a recipe for more corruption under an...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Love Affair of Pearl Spot

AI-generated I am not fond of fish. Fish doesn’t taste like fish, that’s the reason. We get adulterated fish most of the time. In Kerala, my state, traders are reported to use formalin for preserving the freshness of fish. Formalin is used for preserving dead bodies by embalming. You will find me in a fish stall once in a while, though. My cats want fish occasionally, that’s why. Not that they are particularly fond of it. For a change from the regular pellets and packaged wet foods, all delivered promptly by Amazon. Even cats love a change. Most of the time, the entire fish that I buy is consumed by my cats. So much so, Maggie and I have come to think that fish is cat food, not human food. People may have different reasons for not eating any particular food. One of the most endearing reasons I heard recently is that fish is a symbol of the voiceless. People commit atrocities on fish, this person said [I forget who – I read it a couple of weeks back on Magzter]. They suffocate it ...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl