Skip to main content

Enlightenment



Enlightenment is losing the world and gaining the universe. That doesn’t mean that you get out of the world as the ascetics in the Himalayas do. On the contrary, enlightenment takes you deep into the world. Enlightenment enables you to see the world more clearly. You see the connectedness between everything. Nobody is your enemy now.

Swami Vivekananda was an enlightened person.

Swami Vivekananda is often projected by India’s right wing as a champion crusader of Hinduism. His Chicago speech is cited as an example for his claims on the superiority of Hinduism. The truth, however, is that Vivekananda had an enlightened approach to reality. Let us look at his stand on Christianity for example.

Vivekananda translated The Imitation of Christ into Bengali. The Imitation is a Christian devotional book which gives practical guidelines on spirituality while it also serves as a meditation book. It is based entirely on the life of Jesus. In an article published in a special edition of The Frontline [8 Feb 2013] issued on the occasion of the 150th birth anniversary of Swami Vivekananda, Anantanand Rambachan wrote that The Imitation of Christ was the only text, other than the Bhagavad Gita, that Vivekananda kept with him while he travelled around in India after the death of his guru, Sri Ramakrishna.

Swami Vivekananda did not like the Christian missionaries for two reasons. One, they let down Jesus absolutely. Their life was an absolute antithesis of all that Jesus stood for. Two, their insistence that their religion was the only right path to spiritual truths and God.

What would Swami Vivekananda say seeing the present day ‘missionaries’ of Hindutva?

Swami Vivekananda liked The Imitation of Christ because of its emphasis on renunciation and its unabated thirst for purity. He compared the concept of self-surrender advocated by that book to the similar spirit exuded by the Gita. He was of the opinion that the teachings of Jesus had the spirit of Advaita in essence. When Jesus said, “I and my father are one,” he was expressing the Advaita concept of Aham Brahmasmi. The human and the divine are not different entities.

We may or may not accept Vivekananda’ s views. The point that this post is trying to make is that he did not oppose other religions in order to propagate Hinduism. Instead, he accepted whatever was good in other religions. He was an enlightened soul. Those who uphold his love for Hinduism nowadays need to delve deeper into his teachings and become enlightened.


PS.
 I'm participating in #BlogchatterA2Z 

Previous Post: The Desert Teaches

Tomorrow: Forest eats forest

 

Comments

  1. An enlightening post on enlightenment. As for example, I was not aware of the book " Imitation of Christ " and that it was very dear to Swami Vivekananda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad I could contribute this little bit of information. Sometimes small details like this can change whole perspectives.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Energising! Every word a gem. I am certain Vivekananda-ji would be Exceptionally Exasperated at current Events...

    As a point of interest, one of my favourite pastimes is to compare the Sermon on the Mount with Shruti Shlokas... I have no doubt at all that Yeshu spent is missing 14 years in study of a Hindu guru! YAM xx
    E=Eternalnot

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know whether Jesus was a disciple of an Indian guru. I have a book which 'proves' that Jesus died in Kashmir. Whatever that is, Jesus and all other genuine teachers were very open-minded about the paths to the divine. Their followers are just the opposite, more often than not.

      Delete
  3. Am aware of his teachings and quotes but didn't know about the imitation of Christ book. It's enlightening to know that he picked good from every religion. I also never felt he advocated a specific religion....like u said prophets teach well ..followers twist them

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is the real tragedy of prophets: they are misinterpreted and their teachings are manipulated.

      Delete
  4. Sometimes, I wonder why more 'well-read' people can't see the 'read to regurgitate' mode employed by all 'fanatics'. Perhaps, we're not reading anything deeply enough any more. Else, such accusations/ideas wouldn't stand a chance in sane society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I understand is that it's about politics rather than spirituality. People who misuse religion for political power do not want to understand religion.

      Delete
  5. He was a rational reformist too. He tried his best. He should have lived longer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. India lost him too early. Otherwise he would have made a bigger impact.

      Delete
  6. Swami Vivekananda was way ahead of his times! Can we ever have anyone like him, in today's chaotic India?

    I did not know about the book The Imitation of Christ. An enlightening post.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am in complete agreement with the thoughts expressed herein. Let me just add from my side that those who uphold his love for Hinduism nowadays will never delve into his teachings because they are relentlessly in search of historical figures (barring from the Nehru family) whose love for Hinduism (real or perceived) is to be upheld to further their vested interests. Skilled in distorting facts and figures (all meanings included), such people are already enlightened (as to what they want for themselves). They do not need any Vivekananda.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Indian Knowledge Systems

Shashi Tharoor wrote a massive book back in 2018 to explore the paradoxes that constitute the man called Narendra Modi. Paradoxes dominate present Indian politics. One of them is what’s called the Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS). What constitute the paradox here are two parallel realities: one genuinely valuable, and the other deeply regressive. The contributions of Aryabhata and Brahmagupta to mathematics, Panini to linguistics, Vedanta to philosophy, and Ayurveda to medicine are genuine traditions that may deserve due attention. But there’s a hijacked version of IKS which is a hilariously, if not villainously, political project. Much of what is now packaged as IKS in government documents, school curricula, and propaganda includes mythological claims treated as historical facts, pseudoscience (e.g., Ravana’s Pushpaka Vimana as a real aircraft or Ganesha’s trunk as a product of plastic surgery), astrology replacing astronomy, ritualism replacing reasoning, attempts to invent the r...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Ghost with a Cat

It was about midnight when Kuriako stopped his car near the roadside eatery known as thattukada in Kerala. He still had another 27 kilometres to go, according to Google Map. Since Google Map had taken him to nowhere lands many a time, Kuriako didn’t commit himself much to that technology. He would rather rely on wayside shopkeepers. Moreover, he needed a cup of lemon tea. ‘How far is Anakkad from here?’ Kuriako asked the tea-vendor. Anakkad is where his friend Varghese lived. The two friends would be meeting after many years now. Both had taken voluntary retirement five years ago from their tedious and rather absurd clerical jobs in a government industry and hadn’t met each other ever since. Varghese abandoned all connection with human civilisation, which he viewed as savagery of the most brutal sort, and went to live in a forest with only the hill tribe people in the neighbourhood. The tribal folk didn’t bother him at all; they had their own occupations. Varghese bought a plot ...