The Dancing Girl of
Mohenjodaro looks only about 15 years old. But there she stands, apparently in
front of many people including elders, “looking perfectly confident of herself
and the world,” in the words of British archaeologist Mortimer Wheeler. John
Marshall, the archaeologist who announced the discovery of the statuette in
1926, was struck by the “half-impudent posture” of the young girl. He just
couldn’t believe that the statuette belonged to the period of 2300-1750 BCE.
Was she really dancing? No one is sure. “She was good at what she did and she
knew it,” says archaeologist Gregory Possehl.
Today, some
4000 years after that Dancing Girl was carved in bronze by an artist living in
Mohenjodaro, the status of women in society deserves a probe. I would like to
look at it just from two angles.
One is the
Sabarimala issue that rocked Kerala three years ago. According to tradition,
women in the menstruating age-group are not allowed to visit the Sabarimala temple
since the presiding deity there is a confirmed bachelor. Well, let us not
divert from the current issue by apparently blasphemous questions like whether
gods are worse than men when it comes to feminine temptations.
The Hindu
right wing in Kerala, including thousands of women, came out on to streets in
loud protests against the judicial decision to let women enter the bachelor god’s
temple. A few women did enter too. Nothing apparently happened to the god’s
chastity because the women entered his chaste premises. But the right wing was
appalled by the potential threat posed by women to their god. In the end, the
verdict to liberate god Ayyappan from a silly tradition was revoked. Women
continue to be banned from Sabarimala. And the women themselves asked for it!
Mohenjodaro’s
dancing girl must have snickered.
The second
example I would like to present is a more recent one. The hijab issue that
raged in Karnataka. The same people (belonging to the same religion, I mean) who
wanted to keep women out of a temple now wanted women of another religion to
unveil their heads. Muslim women should not use the hijab in certain places
like college campuses. Who decides? The same people whose concern for their god’s
chastity kept women out of a temple altogether!
Obviously, it’s
not about the hijab. It’s about political hegemony. One group is trying to show
the other who the Master really is in this country.
Now let’s
look at this hijab issue from the other side. Why would Muslim women insist on
wearing that headgear in a place like India where the weather conditions don’t require
such a dress at all. Forget the weather, why would the women want to restrict
their freedom by putting blinkers on like horses?
In both cases
mentioned here, I think the women defeated themselves out of certain rather witless
political motives. Mohenjodaro’s dancing girl was far more advanced in her
thinking.
PS. I'm
participating in #BlogchatterA2Z
Previous
Post: Loneliness
can kill
Tomorrow:
Nationalism is a drug
theres a scene in a movie called my name is khan where a womans hijab is forcibly removed, from then she stops wearing but that is in USA and after WTC tragedy (the premise in movie). However in India it feels like these are all sudden baseless uproars and yes women and the whole community fell in to the trap neatly and issue got blown out of proportions. I also wrote a post about general situation in India - mine may not be strong and outright frank like urs ...but tried something. May be I will post in last leg of challenge . Yes MOHENJODARO times were better
ReplyDeleteI watched that movie when it was released and liked it too though I don't remember that scene you mention. My personal view is that religions should constantly update themselves. Christianity calls that concept aggiornamento. Islam has much to change in itself. Unfortunately Hinduism today is following Islam in this and a few other regards. As a writer said, we become like our enemies.
DeleteYes Islam does need some upgrade. Even if i agree that there are some who r oppressed ..this is a huge topic to be not discussed in comments..your last statement is quite confusing ...anyway glad to know your thoughts :)
DeleteYes, it tales more space and time. Actually all religious reforms should come from within the religion itself. That is, only a Hindu can reform Hinduism and a Muslim can reform Islam. People like me can only suggest, rather futilely, from outside.
DeleteSuch a well-observed piece. It's true that women often become the flagbearers of patriarchy for political ideas coming out of some men.
ReplyDeleteProbably the mindset is a habit and hence women find it impossible to question their men. There are a few who do question the wrongs but they are too few.
DeleteHari OM
ReplyDeleteWell, apart from the obvious judgement that male archaeologists have placed their own p.o.v. on what they see in this statue, with no basis whatsoever for understanding what any junior lady of the time may have had to endure... I know Muslim ladies who by choice wear the hijab (which does not have 'blinkers' - the full face covering is the niqab) because this is what they wish to do with reflection on their own spiritual path. I also know some who choose not to cover their head. Fortunately they are both in societies (UK and OZ) where the choice is theirs entirely. Problems only arise where others, as you mention here, try to make decisions on somebody elses behalf, for whatever agenda. Women are now and have ever been pawns to power. No matter how 'advanced' we believe ourselves to have become, society still keeps this divide and, as you say, all too often women themselves create the issue! YAM xx
M=Messiah
I took the Dancing Girl as a symbol and the views of the archaeologists mentioned here as the interpretations of that symbol. Symbols are not to be taken literally. They are metaphors. We don't know what the sculptor of that statuette meant. We give the meanings...
DeleteI teach quite many Muslim students and there are more girls than boys among them. Many of these girls would be happier without the hijab that is forced on them by their system. That's the impression I have gathered. There are many who keep it just because it has become a kind of identity mark. Self-inflicted stigma?
I loved how you analysed the Hijab controversy from both the angles. I completely agree, women in the past had better life and probably understood liberation in its true sense. The situation today is worsening every single day!
ReplyDeleteChinmayee Gayatree Sahu.
Unless the women themselves come forward against the oppressions and restrictions imposed on them, there is no hope for a meaningful change. Nothing can be done when the majority of any community choose slavery upon themselves.
DeleteMore than women pitted against women I see it as the clash of the values. India thakfully being a country where everyone can exercise their own choice, has dozens of the mindsets. These mindsets encompass a huge specturm. The far right and the far left being the two ends of it. However there are many like me who believe in live and let live, find these clashes very disturbing. Nothing except destruction comes of violence, isnt it?
ReplyDeleteViolence is the savage way of solving problems. Nothing good comes of it in the end.
DeleteI didn't say it's an instance of women pitted against women. It's women capitulating to the systems made by men.
I read your post, and the comments that followed. I do get your viewpoint in taking Mohenjodaro's dancing girl as a metaphor.
ReplyDeleteI read one of my children's books ages ago, and in it for the Gupta period it was mentioned that women had started facing restrictions. So women being crushed under patriarchy has a long history in India (and in fact rest of the world too).
The only way the country can get out of this quagmire is to restrict religion ( and I mean all religions) to home. Religion should not invade public spaces, at all.
I endorse your view on religion totally. Religion should be a personal affair, practised at home in one's private spaces. But now we have a Prime Minister who openly performs pujas and other rituals in temples and denigrates other faiths.
DeleteExtremism in any form is unhealthy and people suffer. End of story.
ReplyDeleteUndoubtedly.
Delete