Skip to main content

Religious Discrimination and India


Present India is governed by Nathuram Godse’s legacy. Hatred is its fundamental driving force. The organisation that shaped the thoughts of Godse (and Modi as well) re-emerged on the centre stage since Modi took charge in Delhi eight years ago. That is quite natural; cultures have a tendency to revive themselves more strongly than in the original version.

The New Yorker wrote on 5 Mar 2017 that since Modi became the Prime Minister, “the militant group (RSS) has been legitimized and grown exponentially more powerful.” The article titled ‘The Violent Toll of Hindu Nationalism’ was written three years after Modi strode on the red carpet to Sansad Bhavan, having made a grandiose display of humility that he never had by falling prostrate at the entrance. Three years and “nothing to show in terms of economy and development,” said the New Yorker. Nothing worthwhile to show. So religious nationalism became Modi’s only effective platform.

Modi’s hatred of Muslims was already legendary when he became the Prime Minister. Therefore his followers naturally assumed that attacking the Muslims and their places of worship (and others like the Christians and the Dalits too) was their national obligation and sanatan dharma.

The Muslims in India were attacked systematically ever since Modi became PM. They were lynched on waysides, thrown out of running trains, pulled out of homes and beaten to death. With cries of Jai Sri Ram ringing in the background like the theme music of an endless and bizarre TV serial. Even an MP was not left alone. When Asaduddin Owaisi walked to take oath as MP in 2019, he was heckled by India’s elected parliamentarians who also shouted ‘Jai Sri Ram’.

Modi had allowed a Muslim MP to be hacked limb by limb when he was the Chief Minister of his state and had allegedly lent his consent to a riot against the Muslims after the Godhra train incident. Modi had made umpteen statement in public ridiculing the Muslims and making them appear as mass traitors.

After becoming the PM, Modi apparently handed over certain powers to the Jai Sri Ram (JSR) gangs. Power to decide who will wear what dress (the hijab issue, for instance), what foods are patriotic and what are not (the halal issue), who can pray loud and how loud (loudspeaker issue), etc, the latest being the bulldozer issues.

These people, the JSR gangs, will also draft the archaeological history of the places of worship in the country. The Babri Masjid came down and the Ayodhya Temple went up. The Chief Justice who issued the verdict in favour of the temple was accommodated in the Rajya Sabha after retirement. He had issued many other similar verdicts for the sake of the Big Boss. The Judiciary had stooped to lick the dust on the shoes of the Boss.

Article 370 went. Kashmir became a parade ground of Indian soldiers. The Citizenship Act was passed. Hundreds of thousands of Indian Muslims became citizens of no country. The benign Indian State, under the leadership of Modi, even went to the extent of becoming the guardian angel of the Muslim women by forbidding the triple talaq. (That and many other silly practices have/had to go, no doubt. But how they go does speak volumes about motives.)

Now Gyanvapi will make a ghar vapsi. Then the Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura will transmute into Krishna Janmabhoomi. The Teele Wali Masjid is waiting impatiently in Lucknow to become some other Hindu god’s Janmabhoomi. The list is still being made. Some say every mosque in India will be “reclaimed”. Wow!

It is not only Muslims that are under attack. More than 300 cases of anti-Christian violence were reported in the country in 2021 alone, most of them in Yogi’s UP. Since the Christian population in the country is a meagre 2.4%, the attacks are sporadic. The attackers may still be searching for potential victims. It doesn’t take much time to move from Tabrez Ansari to Thomas Abraham.

That is how it happened in Hitler’s Germany. As Martin Niemoller put it: 


***

Why do they do this, however? What’s the point of creating a religious nation? There is ample evidence from all around that theocracies are the worst governments. They are primitive in outlook, savage in action, ignorant and superstitious. Do we really want that sort of a nation?

PS. This is the last part of a three-part series on discriminations in India written for Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

Part 1: Gender discrimination in the womb

Part 2: Linguistic Discrimination and India

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    You have taken a strong theme, yet again, and are making your mark upon it! An excellent article. The three together make good examples and arguments... oh if only such words could be seen/heard where they are needed most... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They all know these things. But they pretend to know better....

      India's tragedy is its politicians. They are catastrophic.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...