Skip to main content

Religious Discrimination and India


Present India is governed by Nathuram Godse’s legacy. Hatred is its fundamental driving force. The organisation that shaped the thoughts of Godse (and Modi as well) re-emerged on the centre stage since Modi took charge in Delhi eight years ago. That is quite natural; cultures have a tendency to revive themselves more strongly than in the original version.

The New Yorker wrote on 5 Mar 2017 that since Modi became the Prime Minister, “the militant group (RSS) has been legitimized and grown exponentially more powerful.” The article titled ‘The Violent Toll of Hindu Nationalism’ was written three years after Modi strode on the red carpet to Sansad Bhavan, having made a grandiose display of humility that he never had by falling prostrate at the entrance. Three years and “nothing to show in terms of economy and development,” said the New Yorker. Nothing worthwhile to show. So religious nationalism became Modi’s only effective platform.

Modi’s hatred of Muslims was already legendary when he became the Prime Minister. Therefore his followers naturally assumed that attacking the Muslims and their places of worship (and others like the Christians and the Dalits too) was their national obligation and sanatan dharma.

The Muslims in India were attacked systematically ever since Modi became PM. They were lynched on waysides, thrown out of running trains, pulled out of homes and beaten to death. With cries of Jai Sri Ram ringing in the background like the theme music of an endless and bizarre TV serial. Even an MP was not left alone. When Asaduddin Owaisi walked to take oath as MP in 2019, he was heckled by India’s elected parliamentarians who also shouted ‘Jai Sri Ram’.

Modi had allowed a Muslim MP to be hacked limb by limb when he was the Chief Minister of his state and had allegedly lent his consent to a riot against the Muslims after the Godhra train incident. Modi had made umpteen statement in public ridiculing the Muslims and making them appear as mass traitors.

After becoming the PM, Modi apparently handed over certain powers to the Jai Sri Ram (JSR) gangs. Power to decide who will wear what dress (the hijab issue, for instance), what foods are patriotic and what are not (the halal issue), who can pray loud and how loud (loudspeaker issue), etc, the latest being the bulldozer issues.

These people, the JSR gangs, will also draft the archaeological history of the places of worship in the country. The Babri Masjid came down and the Ayodhya Temple went up. The Chief Justice who issued the verdict in favour of the temple was accommodated in the Rajya Sabha after retirement. He had issued many other similar verdicts for the sake of the Big Boss. The Judiciary had stooped to lick the dust on the shoes of the Boss.

Article 370 went. Kashmir became a parade ground of Indian soldiers. The Citizenship Act was passed. Hundreds of thousands of Indian Muslims became citizens of no country. The benign Indian State, under the leadership of Modi, even went to the extent of becoming the guardian angel of the Muslim women by forbidding the triple talaq. (That and many other silly practices have/had to go, no doubt. But how they go does speak volumes about motives.)

Now Gyanvapi will make a ghar vapsi. Then the Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura will transmute into Krishna Janmabhoomi. The Teele Wali Masjid is waiting impatiently in Lucknow to become some other Hindu god’s Janmabhoomi. The list is still being made. Some say every mosque in India will be “reclaimed”. Wow!

It is not only Muslims that are under attack. More than 300 cases of anti-Christian violence were reported in the country in 2021 alone, most of them in Yogi’s UP. Since the Christian population in the country is a meagre 2.4%, the attacks are sporadic. The attackers may still be searching for potential victims. It doesn’t take much time to move from Tabrez Ansari to Thomas Abraham.

That is how it happened in Hitler’s Germany. As Martin Niemoller put it: 


***

Why do they do this, however? What’s the point of creating a religious nation? There is ample evidence from all around that theocracies are the worst governments. They are primitive in outlook, savage in action, ignorant and superstitious. Do we really want that sort of a nation?

PS. This is the last part of a three-part series on discriminations in India written for Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

Part 1: Gender discrimination in the womb

Part 2: Linguistic Discrimination and India

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    You have taken a strong theme, yet again, and are making your mark upon it! An excellent article. The three together make good examples and arguments... oh if only such words could be seen/heard where they are needed most... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They all know these things. But they pretend to know better....

      India's tragedy is its politicians. They are catastrophic.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...