Skip to main content

Country of Hatred

 


In a poem titled ‘Love of Country,’ Malayalam poet Balachandran Chullikkadu wrote:

            In the beginning there were no countries.

            In the beginning was the word.

            Then water, and then life.

            Then countries came

            And love vanished.

A few lines later, the poet asks:

            Where are the borders of solitude?

            Where the soul’s lines of control?

            What I seek is not love of country,

            But a country of love.

            An empire of life.

I happened to read an interview of this poet in the latest issue of Deshabhimani weekly published by CPI(M). He says that writers are really helpless in shaping people’s thoughts and attitudes. He cites an example from the time of Indira Gandhi’s Emergency. Many writers including him questioned Emergency and Indira’s dictatorship in their poems and other writings. But people elected her to power again.

Writers make little impact on ordinary people. People are swayed by the rhetoric of politicians and the mumbo jumbo of the religious. This is truer than ever in contemporary India. See how political as well as religious leaders mislead millions of people easily in India now. Blatant lies are accepted as truths. Absolute fraudulence is embraced by people happily as historical facts. Hatred is preached by people in power and, worse, by religious leaders. And that hatred is accepted as virtue by incredibly large numbers of people. 

Balachandran Chullikkadu

Rama’s story, which is nothing more than good fiction, is passed of as real history and a whole nation is going to be founded on that fiction which belongs to a period called Treta Yuga which is nothing more than myth. Balachandran says that in his interview. Don’t pounce on me now for quoting him. He goes on to argue that the Sangh Parivar is forging a culture based on a messy admixture of umpteen falsehoods and myths and assumptions. It is a fake culture that rejects a lot of historical facts and truths including the protean varieties of miscegenation that created the Indians of today. There are no pure Indians of any particular race. There are many bloods, many cultures, many races that went into the shaping of the present Indians. Sangh Parivar turns a blind eye to too many truths while foisting endless falsehoods on the people in the name of some imagined pure race. Pity.

The world has started taking note of this now, thanks to silly people like Nupur Sharma and Naveen Jindal. Nupur and Naveen are just symbols. The real rot is lying much deeper in the Indian polity. India has become a cancerous country. It’s going to be a tough job for any good leader to usher in the much-needed radiation therapy.

           

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    Again, I fear, the same is true in so many places; but no doubt about it, India currently is proving to be a beacon of the sort of idealism that was engendered in Germany a hundred years past... and a growing sense of horror fills one's being. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I still nurture a hope that India will see the light sooner than later. There are plenty of people who have started questioning the Parivar politics. In the latest byelection in Kerala, BJP couldn't even retain its deposit.

      Delete
  2. So much truth in what you say. The sad part is there are few people with common sense. .......Then countries came ........... and love vanished. - so true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. May more people realise the folly and futility of nationalism.

      Delete
  3. Many people knowingly and willingly vote for bad leaders.
    Gyanvapi case should not have been allowed. Places of Worship Act 1991 is ignored. All over India we see demands for demolition of mosques.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And it's not going to end with Gyanvapi. So many others are waiting to be "reclaimed"!

      Delete
  4. Tomichan... we are warped, that we are creating a ruckus on the basis of a non-religion narrating the stories of non-existing people. To induce a non existing strife so that the attention is diverted from where it has to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If only more and more people see as clearly as you do!

      Delete
  5. His lines are so powerful...what we need is country of love not love of country. ...just wow. Hats off to port. Wish writers and poets had. Grt impact...then we all could hav strived to change few things ?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Writers, scientists, artists, etc inhabit a different milieu which is inaccessible to the common person whose mind is stuck with mediocre notions and metaphors.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...