Skip to main content

Linguistic Discrimination and India

 


Imposition of a language is also an imposition of a culture as well as history and even emotions. Language never comes alone. It is an enormous package burdened with a heavy baggage. India’s present rulers cannot be unaware of it. Nevertheless, they are hellbent on imposing Hindi on the entire nation.

In the 37th meeting of the Parliamentary Official Language Committee on 8 April 2022, Amit Shah declared majestically that Hindi would be made compulsory in all schools of the Northeast till class 10. 22,000 teachers were already recruited to teach Hindi to the Northeasterners, the Home Minister said. He also exhorted all Indians to use Hindi instead of English for communication among people whose mother tongues are different.

“One nation, one language” is a pet slogan of Amit Shah’s. He raised it rather vociferously in June 2019, soon after the Draft New Education Policy was made public. The irony would not have been lost on those who were following the principles of the NEP. Plurality is one of the foundations of the NEP. It seeks to encourage diversity and creativity. It supports multiculturalism and multilingualism. Yet the Home Minister clings rather like a mischievous imbecile on One Nation One Language! [Another matter of curious fun is that the NEP tries to promote Sanskrit among all students with yet another slogan of Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat!]

Does our government really know what it wants? Or is it playing some games just for the sake of hanging on to power for as long as possible?

Whatever the answers are, certain sections of the population end up being victims of linguistic discrimination when the Home Minister’s slogan moves from words into action. And vision statements like the NEP can gape like gargoyles on grotesquely characterless edifices.

India has too many languages for any one language to boss over. As the 3 June 2022 issue of the Frontline says, “In a country as multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-linguistic, multi-sartorial and multi-culinary as India, where multilingualism is increasingly becoming the norm, it is impossible to conceive of one language to the exclusion of all others.” This issue of the Frontline is dedicated to India’s quintessential multilinguality. It says that India has around 700 full-fledged languages, 1800 mother tongues, numerous dialects and many other minor/unrecognised languages. All India Radio broadcasts in 24 languages and 150 dialects. Will all these languages give way to the proposed majestic march of Hindi? What a futile dream! And for what purpose unless it is some cheap political ends? 


The Frontline goes on to draw our attention to the fact that one-third of the world’s 6000-odd languages are spoken in India. These languages fall into several genetically and geographically diverse families. The Dravidian, the Indo-Aryan, the Austro-Asiatic, and the Tibeto-Burman groups of languages make India “a unique linguistic area of centuries of co-existence”.

Hindi is, in fact, a nobody there. A newcomer. Hindi is no older than the 18th century. And whose language is it? It is spoken mainly in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan (the BIMARU states). And it is not even their language, argues the Frontline. Bihar has its own languages like Maithili and Magahi besides Bhojpuri. UP has Awadhi, Bundeli and Bhojpuri. MP has Bagheli, Malawi and Gond. Rajasthan has Mewari and Marwari. Interestingly, even these languages are older than Hindi. Hindi which is nothing more than a latecomer dialect is now claiming status as the national language of a gargantuan assortment of cultures called India.

The concept of Hindi heartland is a myth created by myopic politicians with ulterior motives. It is tremendously discriminatory. The concept seeks to impose one synthetically forged language and culture on a billion plus people. This is how dictatorships begin. This is how enslavement of peoples begins.

This should not go on. Let India remain a country of diversities. Cultural, linguistic, religious, sartorial, culinary… Let that be an infinite variety that enchants the world. And if Amit Shah and others want Indians to learn Hindi, do not ram it down their throats. In the words of the Frontline, “If Hindi is not forced to be seen as a marker of identity of India, probably speakers of other languages will not find it unacceptable.”

There is no worse form of discrimination than imposing your identity on the other.

PS. This post is the 2nd part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter on the theme of DISCRIMINATION.

Part 1: Gender discrimination in the womb

Next will be on Religious discrimination

 

Comments

  1. Yamini MacLeanJune 1, 2022 at 7:00 PM

    Hari Om
    In principle, to have one common language for commerce and governance is not a bad thing of itself. However, as you say, if it is enforced as the cost of all regional speech it becomes tyrannical... and it is doubly surprising that this is so vehemently being applied from those who ought to have learned lessons from the imposition of English in similar fashion. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 1, 2022 at 7:23 PM

      Our present leaders don't learn from history and hence history gets tragicomically repeated.

      Delete
  2. Sujatha SathyaJune 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM

    Just back from a trip to Meghalaya and this topic has a fresh resonance. They don't know Hindi at all or well, just bare minimum - Khana, paisa, kitna ! Just enough to give food and take money in exchange for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 1, 2022 at 8:10 PM

      I read your post on Meghalaya.

      The NE tribals are not fond of Hindi. They embrace English happily. There are many reasons. Culture is one. Seeing the Indian plainsmen as ruthless exploiters is another.

      Delete
  3. GiniaJune 2, 2022 at 6:52 PM

    I love reading your posts. Most of the things you say hit the nail right on the head?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...
2 comments
Read more

Coffee can be bitter

The dawns of my childhood were redolent of filtered black coffee. We were woken up before the birds started singing in the lush green village landscape outside home. The sun would split the darkness of the eastern sky with its splinter of white radiance much after we children had our filtered coffee with a small lump of jaggery. Take a bite of the jaggery and then a sip of the coffee. Coffee was a ritual in our home back then. Perhaps our parents believed it would jolt our neurons awake and help us absorb our lessons before we set out on the 4-kilometre walk to school after all the morning rituals at home. After high school, when I left home for further studies at a distant place, the ritual of the morning coffee stopped. It resumed a whole decade later when I completed my graduation and took up a teaching job in Shillong. But I had lost my taste for filtered coffee by then; tea took its place. Plain tea without milk – what is known as red tea in most parts of India. Coffee ret...
18 comments
Read more

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...
16 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more