Skip to main content

Linguistic Discrimination and India

 


Imposition of a language is also an imposition of a culture as well as history and even emotions. Language never comes alone. It is an enormous package burdened with a heavy baggage. India’s present rulers cannot be unaware of it. Nevertheless, they are hellbent on imposing Hindi on the entire nation.

In the 37th meeting of the Parliamentary Official Language Committee on 8 April 2022, Amit Shah declared majestically that Hindi would be made compulsory in all schools of the Northeast till class 10. 22,000 teachers were already recruited to teach Hindi to the Northeasterners, the Home Minister said. He also exhorted all Indians to use Hindi instead of English for communication among people whose mother tongues are different.

“One nation, one language” is a pet slogan of Amit Shah’s. He raised it rather vociferously in June 2019, soon after the Draft New Education Policy was made public. The irony would not have been lost on those who were following the principles of the NEP. Plurality is one of the foundations of the NEP. It seeks to encourage diversity and creativity. It supports multiculturalism and multilingualism. Yet the Home Minister clings rather like a mischievous imbecile on One Nation One Language! [Another matter of curious fun is that the NEP tries to promote Sanskrit among all students with yet another slogan of Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat!]

Does our government really know what it wants? Or is it playing some games just for the sake of hanging on to power for as long as possible?

Whatever the answers are, certain sections of the population end up being victims of linguistic discrimination when the Home Minister’s slogan moves from words into action. And vision statements like the NEP can gape like gargoyles on grotesquely characterless edifices.

India has too many languages for any one language to boss over. As the 3 June 2022 issue of the Frontline says, “In a country as multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-linguistic, multi-sartorial and multi-culinary as India, where multilingualism is increasingly becoming the norm, it is impossible to conceive of one language to the exclusion of all others.” This issue of the Frontline is dedicated to India’s quintessential multilinguality. It says that India has around 700 full-fledged languages, 1800 mother tongues, numerous dialects and many other minor/unrecognised languages. All India Radio broadcasts in 24 languages and 150 dialects. Will all these languages give way to the proposed majestic march of Hindi? What a futile dream! And for what purpose unless it is some cheap political ends? 


The Frontline goes on to draw our attention to the fact that one-third of the world’s 6000-odd languages are spoken in India. These languages fall into several genetically and geographically diverse families. The Dravidian, the Indo-Aryan, the Austro-Asiatic, and the Tibeto-Burman groups of languages make India “a unique linguistic area of centuries of co-existence”.

Hindi is, in fact, a nobody there. A newcomer. Hindi is no older than the 18th century. And whose language is it? It is spoken mainly in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan (the BIMARU states). And it is not even their language, argues the Frontline. Bihar has its own languages like Maithili and Magahi besides Bhojpuri. UP has Awadhi, Bundeli and Bhojpuri. MP has Bagheli, Malawi and Gond. Rajasthan has Mewari and Marwari. Interestingly, even these languages are older than Hindi. Hindi which is nothing more than a latecomer dialect is now claiming status as the national language of a gargantuan assortment of cultures called India.

The concept of Hindi heartland is a myth created by myopic politicians with ulterior motives. It is tremendously discriminatory. The concept seeks to impose one synthetically forged language and culture on a billion plus people. This is how dictatorships begin. This is how enslavement of peoples begins.

This should not go on. Let India remain a country of diversities. Cultural, linguistic, religious, sartorial, culinary… Let that be an infinite variety that enchants the world. And if Amit Shah and others want Indians to learn Hindi, do not ram it down their throats. In the words of the Frontline, “If Hindi is not forced to be seen as a marker of identity of India, probably speakers of other languages will not find it unacceptable.”

There is no worse form of discrimination than imposing your identity on the other.

PS. This post is the 2nd part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter on the theme of DISCRIMINATION.

Part 1: Gender discrimination in the womb

Next will be on Religious discrimination

 

Comments

  1. Yamini MacLeanJune 1, 2022 at 7:00 PM

    Hari Om
    In principle, to have one common language for commerce and governance is not a bad thing of itself. However, as you say, if it is enforced as the cost of all regional speech it becomes tyrannical... and it is doubly surprising that this is so vehemently being applied from those who ought to have learned lessons from the imposition of English in similar fashion. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 1, 2022 at 7:23 PM

      Our present leaders don't learn from history and hence history gets tragicomically repeated.

      Delete
  2. Sujatha SathyaJune 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM

    Just back from a trip to Meghalaya and this topic has a fresh resonance. They don't know Hindi at all or well, just bare minimum - Khana, paisa, kitna ! Just enough to give food and take money in exchange for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJune 1, 2022 at 8:10 PM

      I read your post on Meghalaya.

      The NE tribals are not fond of Hindi. They embrace English happily. There are many reasons. Culture is one. Seeing the Indian plainsmen as ruthless exploiters is another.

      Delete
  3. GiniaJune 2, 2022 at 6:52 PM

    I love reading your posts. Most of the things you say hit the nail right on the head?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

The Call of Islamic State

A year ago, the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT) reported that about 4000 people from the West left their homes and countries to join the Islamic State (IS).  Many of them are women.  The reporters had made a special study of the women who joined the terrorist outfit and found that it was difficult to categorise which type of women were particularly drawn to IS. “While most of the girls are young, some as young as fifteen,” says the report,  “there are also mothers with young children who make the trip. Some of the girls have difficulties in school and are said to have an IQ below average,  but there are also women who are highly educated. It also appears that even though a relatively large portion of the girls had (or still have) a troubled childhood, there are some who come from families with no known problems with the authorities. Most of the girls come from religiously moderate Muslim families,  yet some converted to Islam a...
33 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

The Plague

When the world today is struggling with the pandemic of Covid-19, Albert Camus’s novel The Plague can offer some stimulating lessons. When a plague breaks out in the city of Oran, initially the political authorities fail to deal with it as a serious problem. The ordinary people also don’t view it as an epidemic that requires public action rather than as individual annoyances. The people of Oran are obsessed with their personal sufferings and inconveniences. Finally the authorities are forced to put Oran in quarantine. Father Paneloux, a Jesuit priest, delivers a sermon declaring the epidemic as God’s punishment for Oran’s sins. Months of suffering make people rise above their selfish notions and obsessions and join anti-plague efforts being carried out by people like Dr Rieux. Dr Rieux is an atheist but committed to service of humanity. He questions Father Paneloux’s religious views when a small boy is killed by the epidemic. The priest delivers another sermon on the necess...
28 comments
Read more

AAP and I

Who defeated Arvind Kejriwal?  Himself or us? His party ruled for just 49 days.  They were momentous days.  He implemented his promise on setting up a number for reporting corruption; in two weeks instead of the promised two days.  He met people to discuss corruption issues, though the crowd was beyond his control.  He did what he could.  He would have done more if he could.  He put an end to the VVIP culture in politics.  The politician became aam aadmi.  Ministers started travelling in vehicles without the screaming red lights and horrifying screeches.  But the police had to go out of their way to provide protection to the chief minister.  Who defeated the chief minister’s vision that political leaders need no such protection from their own people? He revolutionised the admission procedures in schools.  Schools which charged hefty amounts from parents illegally stood to lose.  The aam aadmi would have g...
25 comments
Read more