Skip to main content

A century after Gandhi

 Mahatma Gandhi belonged to the 20th century. He was arguably the saint of that century. 76 years ago, on this very day - 30 Jan - he was assassinated brutally by a misguided and perverted ideology which, unfortunately, has laid siege to contemporary India, thereby assassinating the spirit of Gandhi again and again. 

Allow me to present a few images here on this death anniversary of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. These images have little to do with Gandhi himself. But they have much to do with what he was trying to teach the world about things such as development without heart, greed without limit, craze for power and self-aggrandizement, political chicanery...

The rich and powerful have all the goodies and buddies. The poor are plundered of everything, even their food. When a few choose to live life kingsize, the majority get trampled under their boots. [The images may have little to do with Gandhi directly, as I've already said. Nor with India per se.]



Two faces of religion in the Mahatma's Land. The new devotee and the new High Priest. 



The above is the famous Pulitzer Prize-winning picture taken by journalist Kevin Carter. A starving child in strife-ridden Sudan. Carter committed suicide later. "I'm really, really sorry," his suicide note lamented. 

We all have reasons too many to be sorry today... Let us, at least, keep alive the memory of the Mahatma in our hearts. Maybe, we can still light a candle while the darkness is engulfing us. 

And let me end with just two more images. 







Comments

  1. Hari Om
    That last is offensive, heh na? Not a patch, no, not even a thread resembling the original. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. You'd think we would have been able to figure out how to fix the things he pointed out. Sadly, those in power don't want those things fixed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doing what he loves doing best, spinning tales to his devotees!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel bad for Kevin, to let all that pain rein on himself. People critiqued about him not helping the kid, well where these people before and it wasn't his fault for the world being like this.


    Of course a part of us will feel bad for the kid and for him leaving, he was only human, he may not have realized the gravity of things that would rile him down.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The kevin Carter image is haunting and the aftermath of it even more so. But the last image speaks volume. The PM looks like he's having trouble sitting in that position, rightly so, its not easy to sit where the Mahatma did...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kevin wasn't at fault, he had some mistakes of his own but the main issue was that He wasn't allowed to touch anything foreign there as it might bring in any diseases, He indeed did shooed away the eagle and the food centre wasn't quite far, later sources suggest it was actually a bit and he indeed did survive, The fault of Kevin was that he didn't inform authorities about the child crawling and waited for 10-20minutes keeping the child in vulnerable position just to get that perfect shot , But the photo did bring out much donation and raised issues of incoming threat to other countries ,

      Delete
  6. A sorry state of affairs indeed which seems to be getting worse with each passing day. The image of the starving child tells it all.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A disturbing post... With no immediate answers .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...