Book Review
Title: Aryans: The Search for a People, a
Place and a Myth
Author: Charles Allen
Publisher: Hatchette India, 2023
Pages: 387
This is a book that has the potential to enrage the Right
wing of India. It subverts the entire attempt of Modi Inc to arrogate the roots
of Aryan racehood to India. The Aryans did not originate in India, this book
asserts with sufficient scientific proofs. They came to India across the
Himalayas in a very natural process of migration. All migrations were not
invasions necessarily. But all successful mass migrations do affect the native
population adversely one way or the other. The Harappan and Mohenjo-Daro
civilisations had nothing to do with Aryans unless we consider the possibility
of their being driven to extinction by the Aryans.
This the 26th and the last
book of Charles Allen, a traveller, historian and scholar on India. Allen – who
says that his very name comes from the word ‘Aryan’ – died in 2020 without
completing this book. His friend David Loyn did the job of editing and giving
the conclusion to this scholarly work.
In his introduction to the book, Loyn
says that Charles was motivated by three reasons to write this book. “The first
was sorrow at the way professional historical research has been hijacked in modern
India by some in the politico-religious Hindutva movement who are politically
ascendant and have been looking for a founding narrative for a newly emerging
power on the world stage.” Allen wanted to counter the falsehood of the history
being fabricated by the mendacious Right wing in India.
“The second motivation for this book
was to unpack how the word ‘Aryan’ became so twisted in the West.” Hitler
thought that the Germans were the pure Aryans and his thinking created a lot of
misery on the earth.
“Thirdly, Charles was driven to write
Aryans by his love of archaeology.” There is a lot of proof coming in
from archaeology in this book for the arguments and conclusions it makes.
The book is
divided into four parts. The first part comprising two chapters tells us how
the idea of an Aryan people was mythologised by the Nazis. India under the
present leadership took over Hitler’s superiority complex and Messiah complex.
In the attempt to show that India is the original land of Aryans, the present
dispensation in the country discredits a lot of genuine research that was done
earlier by such Europeans as Max Mueller.
Archaeology becomes the focus of the
second part consisting of chapters 3 to 6. “Something dramatic happened in
the steppe region around 3000 BCE,” argues this book. And that event, whatever
it was, triggered massive migration from Europe and Eurasia. The Aryans spread
to a lot of places including India. Since they were experts with horses, they
managed to subdue the native people wherever they went. They also had better weapons.
They were quite ruthless too.
‘India and the Aryans’ is the title
of Part 3 – chapters 7 to 10. Here we are given a lot of evidence on the
Aryan migration to India. The similarities between the Zoroastrian Avesta
and the Hindu Rig Veda are unmistakable, though the Rig Veda is
the oldest extant Indo-European text and it pre-dates Avesta by hundreds
of years.
In this section, Allen gives us
evidence “of a new culture arriving, almost certainly in the second millennium
BCE that was utterly different from that which had previously shaped the Indus
and Punjab region.” For example, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age began in India
with the arrival of the Aryans, who brought with them not only their horses and
chariots but also their metal workers and armours. Historical proofs for all
the claims are aplenty in this book. The Rig Veda declared the Aryans as
upper caste people and the others became Shudras and untouchables.
Chapter 10, the last of this section,
examines the Hindu nationalism that has gripped India like a plague now. From
Rammohun Roy to V D Savarkar, the major Hindutva proponents get brief
introductions in this chapter titled ‘Holy Cows and Gurus.’
The last part has just one
chapter in which we get a lot of the recent research and findings on the issue.
DNA studies aplenty have been carried out on both ancient skeletons and present
Indians groups. Lalji Singh and Kumarasamy Thangaraj collected samples from no
less than 18,000 Indians belonging to 25 different groups for a DNA study which
gave conclusive evidence “for the existence of two ancient populations
ancestral to most Indians today but also genetically highly divergent from each
other.” The North Indians and the South Indians have different DNA, in short.
The North Indians share 70% of their genes with Europe while the South Indian
share of the European DNA is only 30%.
The North Indian genes are closely
related to Central Asian, Middle Easterners, Caucasians and Europeans while their
southern counterparts “have greater ties to the subcontinent and with few links
outside it.” This last chapter hurls at us some stunning scientific data. The present
dispensation in Delhi won’t like it at all. Its own historians are busy
rewriting history with the help of epics and myths while science is discredited
again and again from public platforms by none other than the Prime Minister
himself. Soon we will see this Prime Minister donning the robes of a priest and
consecrating a temple dedicated to a prehistoric divine avatar.
Charles Allen’s book is extremely relevant
and pertinent in today’s India. Those who are not interested in history and its
inevitable jargon may find it a bit tedious. But it is not too academic in
style. It is eminently readable. Those who prefer the consolations of myths
should stay away from this book, of course.
Hari OM
ReplyDeleteAm adding that one to my wishlist... I can highly recommend the writings of William Dalrymple as another who does much to keep history on track against the tide of those who would angle it their way. YAM xx
I have read only one book of Dalrymple. The Last Mughal. I loved it.
DeleteThe genetic differences between North India and South India are fascinating. I wonder how it ended up like that. Aryan is such a fraught term nowadays. I wonder if the people who study the various ancient tribes might consider renaming them.
ReplyDeleteThe North - South difference is not surprising, given the Dravidian roots of the South.
DeleteThey had Aryan nation church, not that far. But good thing they went bankrupt. I'm sure that church ideal of Aryan is different.
ReplyDeleteI'm not very familiar with that. But I wonder why religions should seek out differences when they should be interested in unity.
DeleteSeems interesting. Will give it a go when possible.
ReplyDeleteIt definitely is interesting. Many of us may not be aware of revent research and discoveries.
DeleteWow. I will be adding it to my list. What makes me sad is that this book and its sound reasoning and facts will inevitably be seen as a "western" take and hence irrelevent to any true "Indian"
ReplyDeleteYes, that's exactly how it will be assaulted. I was just wondering why no reader has pounced on me yet with that argument.
Delete