Skip to main content

Aryans

 



Book Review



Title: Aryans: The Search for a People, a Place and a Myth

Author: Charles Allen

Publisher: Hatchette India, 2023

Pages: 387



This is a book that has the potential to enrage the Right wing of India. It subverts the entire attempt of Modi Inc to arrogate the roots of Aryan racehood to India. The Aryans did not originate in India, this book asserts with sufficient scientific proofs. They came to India across the Himalayas in a very natural process of migration. All migrations were not invasions necessarily. But all successful mass migrations do affect the native population adversely one way or the other. The Harappan and Mohenjo-Daro civilisations had nothing to do with Aryans unless we consider the possibility of their being driven to extinction by the Aryans.

This the 26th and the last book of Charles Allen, a traveller, historian and scholar on India. Allen – who says that his very name comes from the word ‘Aryan’ – died in 2020 without completing this book. His friend David Loyn did the job of editing and giving the conclusion to this scholarly work.

In his introduction to the book, Loyn says that Charles was motivated by three reasons to write this book. “The first was sorrow at the way professional historical research has been hijacked in modern India by some in the politico-religious Hindutva movement who are politically ascendant and have been looking for a founding narrative for a newly emerging power on the world stage.” Allen wanted to counter the falsehood of the history being fabricated by the mendacious Right wing in India.

“The second motivation for this book was to unpack how the word ‘Aryan’ became so twisted in the West.” Hitler thought that the Germans were the pure Aryans and his thinking created a lot of misery on the earth.

“Thirdly, Charles was driven to write Aryans by his love of archaeology.” There is a lot of proof coming in from archaeology in this book for the arguments and conclusions it makes.

The book is divided into four parts. The first part comprising two chapters tells us how the idea of an Aryan people was mythologised by the Nazis. India under the present leadership took over Hitler’s superiority complex and Messiah complex. In the attempt to show that India is the original land of Aryans, the present dispensation in the country discredits a lot of genuine research that was done earlier by such Europeans as Max Mueller.

Archaeology becomes the focus of the second part consisting of chapters 3 to 6. “Something dramatic happened in the steppe region around 3000 BCE,” argues this book. And that event, whatever it was, triggered massive migration from Europe and Eurasia. The Aryans spread to a lot of places including India. Since they were experts with horses, they managed to subdue the native people wherever they went. They also had better weapons. They were quite ruthless too.

‘India and the Aryans’ is the title of Part 3 – chapters 7 to 10. Here we are given a lot of evidence on the Aryan migration to India. The similarities between the Zoroastrian Avesta and the Hindu Rig Veda are unmistakable, though the Rig Veda is the oldest extant Indo-European text and it pre-dates Avesta by hundreds of years.

In this section, Allen gives us evidence “of a new culture arriving, almost certainly in the second millennium BCE that was utterly different from that which had previously shaped the Indus and Punjab region.” For example, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age began in India with the arrival of the Aryans, who brought with them not only their horses and chariots but also their metal workers and armours. Historical proofs for all the claims are aplenty in this book. The Rig Veda declared the Aryans as upper caste people and the others became Shudras and untouchables.

Chapter 10, the last of this section, examines the Hindu nationalism that has gripped India like a plague now. From Rammohun Roy to V D Savarkar, the major Hindutva proponents get brief introductions in this chapter titled ‘Holy Cows and Gurus.’

The last part has just one chapter in which we get a lot of the recent research and findings on the issue. DNA studies aplenty have been carried out on both ancient skeletons and present Indians groups. Lalji Singh and Kumarasamy Thangaraj collected samples from no less than 18,000 Indians belonging to 25 different groups for a DNA study which gave conclusive evidence “for the existence of two ancient populations ancestral to most Indians today but also genetically highly divergent from each other.” The North Indians and the South Indians have different DNA, in short. The North Indians share 70% of their genes with Europe while the South Indian share of the European DNA is only 30%.

The North Indian genes are closely related to Central Asian, Middle Easterners, Caucasians and Europeans while their southern counterparts “have greater ties to the subcontinent and with few links outside it.” This last chapter hurls at us some stunning scientific data. The present dispensation in Delhi won’t like it at all. Its own historians are busy rewriting history with the help of epics and myths while science is discredited again and again from public platforms by none other than the Prime Minister himself. Soon we will see this Prime Minister donning the robes of a priest and consecrating a temple dedicated to a prehistoric divine avatar.

Charles Allen’s book is extremely relevant and pertinent in today’s India. Those who are not interested in history and its inevitable jargon may find it a bit tedious. But it is not too academic in style. It is eminently readable. Those who prefer the consolations of myths should stay away from this book, of course.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Am adding that one to my wishlist... I can highly recommend the writings of William Dalrymple as another who does much to keep history on track against the tide of those who would angle it their way. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have read only one book of Dalrymple. The Last Mughal. I loved it.

      Delete
  2. The genetic differences between North India and South India are fascinating. I wonder how it ended up like that. Aryan is such a fraught term nowadays. I wonder if the people who study the various ancient tribes might consider renaming them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The North - South difference is not surprising, given the Dravidian roots of the South.

      Delete
  3. They had Aryan nation church, not that far. But good thing they went bankrupt. I'm sure that church ideal of Aryan is different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not very familiar with that. But I wonder why religions should seek out differences when they should be interested in unity.

      Delete
  4. Seems interesting. Will give it a go when possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It definitely is interesting. Many of us may not be aware of revent research and discoveries.

      Delete
  5. Wow. I will be adding it to my list. What makes me sad is that this book and its sound reasoning and facts will inevitably be seen as a "western" take and hence irrelevent to any true "Indian"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that's exactly how it will be assaulted. I was just wondering why no reader has pounced on me yet with that argument.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

My Experiments with Hindi

M y knowledge of Hindi is remarkably deficient despite my living in the northern parts of India for three whole decades. The language never appealed to me. Rather, my Hindi teachers at school, without exception, were the coarsest people I ever met in that period of my life and they created my aversion to Hindi. Someone told me later that those who took up Hindi as their academic major in Kerala were people who failed to secure admission to any other course. That is, if you’re good for nothing else, then go for Hindi. And so they end up as disgruntled people. We students became the victims of that discontent. I don’t know if this theory is correct, however. Though I studied Hindi as my third language (there was no other option) at school for six years, I couldn’t speak one good sentence in that language when I turned my back on school happily and with immense relief after the tenth grade. Of course, I could manage some simple sentences like में लड़का हू। [I am a boy.] A few line...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...