Skip to main content

Decline of Democracy and Rise of Strong Leader


Half of the world’s population will go to the polls this year. Forty countries will be voting for a new government in 2024. That will be 3.2 billion people exercising their democratic privilege of choosing who will govern them. If we add the local body elections and county/state elections, then the number of countries going to the polls will rise to 76.

Open Society Foundations of the USA conducted a survey a few months back to study the health of democracy in various countries. The survey covered 36,000 adults each (18 years and above) from 30 countries including India. That is a mammoth survey. Some of the findings may be a little disturbing for those who love democracy. 


A large number of youngsters seem to be losing faith in democracy, according to the survey results. While among the people in the age group of 56 and above, 26% preferred a strong leader to democracy, the percentage of youngsters (18-35 years) who made the same choice was 35. Nearly half of this latter group would choose authoritarianism over democracy. [Read details here.]

My guess is that the young people are weary of the hydra-headed corruption that democracy engenders almost universally. A strong leader with a great vision seems to be an ideal that will match the dreams and aspirations of the youth.

Take India, for example. Narendra Modi is quite sure to win the next elections and be the prime minister for the third term. He has created for himself an image of a ‘strong leader’ with a ‘vision’ that appeals to the majority community in the country. He has put up colossal nationalist icons like the Statue of Unity, the Kashi corridor, and now the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. He is seen by the vast majority of Hindus in India as the Messiah of Hinduism, the Redeemer of the emasculated Indian male virility, and the Harbinger of a trillion-dollar economy.

While Modi has brought quite a few significant and welcome changes to the country’s socio-economic situation, the damage he has done and is still doing to the secular fabric and scientific temper of the country can never be ignored. It is most likely that within a year of Modi’s re-election this year, India will be declared a Hindu Rashtra and that the minority communities will be relegated as second-class or even lesser kind of citizens. True, of late, Modi is displaying some kind of camaraderie with the Christian religious leaders in the country. Will such friendship be extended to the Muslims whom Modi has virtually made to appear as the de facto enemies of the nation? Given the way history has been distorted in textbooks and other academic material, given the way institutions (including the judiciary) have been communalised, and given the way the citizens are polarised along sectarian lines, the prognosis for India’s next five years is not very promising. 


Sectarianism is one of the problems only. The economy will be another serious issue. As of now, the richest one percent of India’s population (who are all very close to Modi and his political party) own 40% of the country’s wealth. Oxfam has labelled it “obscene inequality.” What is worrying more is Modi’s taxation policy by which the poor pay far more in taxes than the rich. 64% of the total Goods and Services Tax [GST] come from the bottom 50% of the population, while only a minuscule 4% come from the top 10%!

The rich in India are given all kinds of sops and tax exemptions and benefits and rewards under various guises including mammoth bank loans which are often not repaid. These affluent in turn make huge contributions to Modi’s political party. Modi and the affluent in India are scratching each other’s backs while the poor are becoming poorer though stats will show a burgeoning economy. Statistical averages are as absurd as Modi’s spirituality. Modi’s economic stats are like the female bikini: pretending to be very revelatory but ends up as mere tantalisations.

“India is unfortunately on a fast track to becoming a county only for the rich,” Oxfam India’s CEO Amitabh Behar said recently. The system ensures “the survival of the richest.” No wonder, too many of India’s youth are leaving the country for good. No wonder, again, the number of suicides is mounting day by day.

A strong leader may not be the best choice unless you are on the right side of his sectarian divisions.  


Comments

  1. India is a great country, with millions of people inside. The History of this ancient country is great, and highly valuable. I think all the leaders must be possible that the country be best, and high, and that the people will be better.
    I Hope India will have this next years good luck, and more increase in the quality of Life for the most possible people ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me share your optimism. India can be an ideal nation. But her rulers are the prime hurdles.

      Delete
  2. Too many people don't seem to understand this "strong" leader thing means the "little people" will get trampled in one way or another.

    In answer to your question on my blog: it doesn't get "cold" where I live. I'm in southern California. We've dipped down to about 3C a couple nights, and that's really as low as we ever get. Our daytime temps have been about 18C. For us, this is frigid, and we're all in parkas and boots. And wearing blankets. When I talk about being cold, there's a certain level of sarcasm always present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for taking the trouble to answer me here though I'd have revisited your post for the response.

      Delete
  3. Hari Om
    It does seem that more and more people are seeking the presence of an iconic leader. Some places are manifesting them, Modi being one of these. The whole world holds its breath for November and the American elections... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many countries seem to prefer a strong leader. Wasn't Trump one of them? Russia, China have strong leaders! Israel?

      Delete
  4. A leader is one who can transform lives. Today more Indians are economically poorer contrary to what Niti Aayog may state.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The real catastrophe is the barrage of falsehood being foisted on the nation as truths.

      Delete
  5. In a democracy laws and policies take very long to see the light of day while in a single party rule with a single leader it's much faster and with the rapid rate of social and technological change, the latter is preferred by the latest generation who dont have the time to revel in the finer qualities of democracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a wise understanding of the situation, I'd say. Probably, there's a need for reforming the democratic ways of doing things.

      Delete
  6. Sometimes an individual (not a party) wins because there is no better alternative! I am no Modi fan, even lesser after all the fanfare around Ayodhya Temple, but what else can I do, but go with the flow? He is also human, he needs to create a succession line, but he does not seem interested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He thinks he's as eternal as his deities and so a successor won't be required.

      Delete
  7. What's happening there sounds familiar in a lot of ways to what's happening here in the US. I pray we don't lose our democracy. I pray and I vote.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, a lot of similarities can be found between USA and India. Conservative nationalism?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The music of an ageing man

Having entered the latter half of my sixties, I view each day as a bonus. People much younger become obituaries these days around me. That awareness helps me to sober down in spite of the youthful rush of blood in my indignant veins. Age hasn’t withered my indignation against injustice, fraudulence, and blatant human folly, much as I would like to withdraw from the ringside and watch the pugilism from a balcony seat with mellowed amusement. But my genes rage against my will. The one who warned me in my folly-ridden youth to be wary of my (anyone’s, for that matter) destiny-shaping character was farsighted. I failed to subdue the rages of my veins. I still fail. That’s how some people are, I console myself. So, at the crossroads of my sixties, I confess to a dismal lack of emotional maturity that should rightfully belong to my age. The problem is that the sociopolitical reality around me doesn’t help anyway to soothe my nerves. On the contrary, that reality is almost entirely re...

Mahatma Ayyankali’s Relevance Today

About a year before he left for Chicago (1893), Swami Vivekananda visited Kerala and described the state (then Travancore-Cochin-Malabar princely states) as a “lunatic asylum.” The spiritual philosopher was shocked by the brutality of the caste system that was in practice in the region. The peasant caste of Pulayas , for example, had to keep a distance of 90 feet from Brahmins and 64 feet from Nairs. The low caste people were denied most human rights. They could not access education, enter temple premises, or buy essentials from markets. They were not even considered as humans. Ayyankali (1863-1941) was a Pulaya leader who emerged to confront the situation. I just finished reading a biography of his in Malayalam and was highly impressed by the contributions of the great man who came to be known in Kerala as the Mahatma of the Dalits . What prompted me to order a copy of the biography was an article I read in a Malayalam periodical last week. The article described how Ayyankali...

Duryodhana Returns

Duryodhana was bored of his centuries-long exile in Mythland and decided to return to his former kingdom. Arnab Gau-Swami had declared Bihar the new Kurukshetra and so Duryodhana chose Bihar for his adventure. And Bihar did entertain him with its modern enactment of the Mahabharata. Alliances broke, cousins pulled down each other, kings switched sides without shame, and advisers looked like modern-day Shakunis with laptops. Duryodhana’s curiosity was more than piqued. There’s more masala here than in the old Hastinapura. He decided to make a deep study of this politics so that he could conclusively prove that he was not a villain but a misunderstood statesman ahead of his time. The first lesson he learns is that everyone should claim that they are the Pandavas, and portray everyone else as the Kauravas. Every party claims they stand for dharma, the people, and justice. And then plot to topple someone, eliminate someone else, distort history, fabricate expedient truths, manipulate...