Skip to main content

Decline of Democracy and Rise of Strong Leader


Half of the world’s population will go to the polls this year. Forty countries will be voting for a new government in 2024. That will be 3.2 billion people exercising their democratic privilege of choosing who will govern them. If we add the local body elections and county/state elections, then the number of countries going to the polls will rise to 76.

Open Society Foundations of the USA conducted a survey a few months back to study the health of democracy in various countries. The survey covered 36,000 adults each (18 years and above) from 30 countries including India. That is a mammoth survey. Some of the findings may be a little disturbing for those who love democracy. 


A large number of youngsters seem to be losing faith in democracy, according to the survey results. While among the people in the age group of 56 and above, 26% preferred a strong leader to democracy, the percentage of youngsters (18-35 years) who made the same choice was 35. Nearly half of this latter group would choose authoritarianism over democracy. [Read details here.]

My guess is that the young people are weary of the hydra-headed corruption that democracy engenders almost universally. A strong leader with a great vision seems to be an ideal that will match the dreams and aspirations of the youth.

Take India, for example. Narendra Modi is quite sure to win the next elections and be the prime minister for the third term. He has created for himself an image of a ‘strong leader’ with a ‘vision’ that appeals to the majority community in the country. He has put up colossal nationalist icons like the Statue of Unity, the Kashi corridor, and now the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. He is seen by the vast majority of Hindus in India as the Messiah of Hinduism, the Redeemer of the emasculated Indian male virility, and the Harbinger of a trillion-dollar economy.

While Modi has brought quite a few significant and welcome changes to the country’s socio-economic situation, the damage he has done and is still doing to the secular fabric and scientific temper of the country can never be ignored. It is most likely that within a year of Modi’s re-election this year, India will be declared a Hindu Rashtra and that the minority communities will be relegated as second-class or even lesser kind of citizens. True, of late, Modi is displaying some kind of camaraderie with the Christian religious leaders in the country. Will such friendship be extended to the Muslims whom Modi has virtually made to appear as the de facto enemies of the nation? Given the way history has been distorted in textbooks and other academic material, given the way institutions (including the judiciary) have been communalised, and given the way the citizens are polarised along sectarian lines, the prognosis for India’s next five years is not very promising. 


Sectarianism is one of the problems only. The economy will be another serious issue. As of now, the richest one percent of India’s population (who are all very close to Modi and his political party) own 40% of the country’s wealth. Oxfam has labelled it “obscene inequality.” What is worrying more is Modi’s taxation policy by which the poor pay far more in taxes than the rich. 64% of the total Goods and Services Tax [GST] come from the bottom 50% of the population, while only a minuscule 4% come from the top 10%!

The rich in India are given all kinds of sops and tax exemptions and benefits and rewards under various guises including mammoth bank loans which are often not repaid. These affluent in turn make huge contributions to Modi’s political party. Modi and the affluent in India are scratching each other’s backs while the poor are becoming poorer though stats will show a burgeoning economy. Statistical averages are as absurd as Modi’s spirituality. Modi’s economic stats are like the female bikini: pretending to be very revelatory but ends up as mere tantalisations.

“India is unfortunately on a fast track to becoming a county only for the rich,” Oxfam India’s CEO Amitabh Behar said recently. The system ensures “the survival of the richest.” No wonder, too many of India’s youth are leaving the country for good. No wonder, again, the number of suicides is mounting day by day.

A strong leader may not be the best choice unless you are on the right side of his sectarian divisions.  


Comments

  1. India is a great country, with millions of people inside. The History of this ancient country is great, and highly valuable. I think all the leaders must be possible that the country be best, and high, and that the people will be better.
    I Hope India will have this next years good luck, and more increase in the quality of Life for the most possible people ever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me share your optimism. India can be an ideal nation. But her rulers are the prime hurdles.

      Delete
  2. Too many people don't seem to understand this "strong" leader thing means the "little people" will get trampled in one way or another.

    In answer to your question on my blog: it doesn't get "cold" where I live. I'm in southern California. We've dipped down to about 3C a couple nights, and that's really as low as we ever get. Our daytime temps have been about 18C. For us, this is frigid, and we're all in parkas and boots. And wearing blankets. When I talk about being cold, there's a certain level of sarcasm always present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for taking the trouble to answer me here though I'd have revisited your post for the response.

      Delete
  3. Hari Om
    It does seem that more and more people are seeking the presence of an iconic leader. Some places are manifesting them, Modi being one of these. The whole world holds its breath for November and the American elections... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many countries seem to prefer a strong leader. Wasn't Trump one of them? Russia, China have strong leaders! Israel?

      Delete
  4. A leader is one who can transform lives. Today more Indians are economically poorer contrary to what Niti Aayog may state.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The real catastrophe is the barrage of falsehood being foisted on the nation as truths.

      Delete
  5. In a democracy laws and policies take very long to see the light of day while in a single party rule with a single leader it's much faster and with the rapid rate of social and technological change, the latter is preferred by the latest generation who dont have the time to revel in the finer qualities of democracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a wise understanding of the situation, I'd say. Probably, there's a need for reforming the democratic ways of doing things.

      Delete
  6. Sometimes an individual (not a party) wins because there is no better alternative! I am no Modi fan, even lesser after all the fanfare around Ayodhya Temple, but what else can I do, but go with the flow? He is also human, he needs to create a succession line, but he does not seem interested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He thinks he's as eternal as his deities and so a successor won't be required.

      Delete
  7. What's happening there sounds familiar in a lot of ways to what's happening here in the US. I pray we don't lose our democracy. I pray and I vote.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, a lot of similarities can be found between USA and India. Conservative nationalism?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...