Skip to main content

Karma in Gita


I bought a copy of annotated Bhagavad Gita a few months back with the intention of understanding the scripture better since I’m living in a country that has become a Hindu theocracy in all but the Constitution. After reading the first part [chapters 1 to 6] which is about Karma, I gave up. Shelving a book [literally and metaphorically] is not entirely strange to me. If a book fails to appeal to me after a reasonable number of pages, I abandon it. The Gita failed to make sense to me just like any other scripture. That’s not surprising since I’m not a religious kind of a person. I go by reason. I accept poetry which is not quite rational. Art is meaningful for me though I can’t detect any logic in it. Even mysticism is acceptable. But the kind of stuff that Krishna was telling Arjuna didn’t make any sense at all. To me.

Just a sample. When Arjuna says he doesn’t want to fight the war because he can’t kill his own kith and kin, Krishna’s answer is: Fight. If you are killed, you win heaven. If you conquer, you win the earth. Rise and fight, man. [2.37]

The numbers in square brackets refer to the chapter and verse of the Gita. The translation is my own. I went through three different editions and found all the translations obsolete if not obfuscating.

Before I proceed with Krishna any further, let me tell you about my renewed interest in the Gita. Three different versions of the sacred song landed in my house the other day as part of a project I took up recently. I’m forced to read them, in other words. One of the four you find in the photo was bought by me a few months back.

Now, back to Krishna and Karma.

As a Kshatriya, Arjuna should have accepted Krishna’s pragmatic counsel above. A few verses earlier, Krishna had tried metaphysics. The soul is immortal and you cannot kill it. You are only killing the bodies of these people. You are releasing the eternal soul from the mortal body. [2.19-21] Such metaphysics had had no impact on Arjuna. That is why, I guess, Krishna resorted to the ruthless pragmatism of the win-win strategy cited above. Kill and you win the earth. Or be killed and you win heaven.

Arjuna is not quite convinced. Is there no better way than killing or dying for solving a problem? There are other ways, of course. Bhakti yoga [chapters 7-12] and Jnana yoga [chapters 13-18]. But now we are on a battlefield. And you are a soldier. It is your duty to fight.

Action (karma) and duty (dharma) are the two vital concepts of the first 6 chapters of the Gita, as far as I understand. Let me warn you, dear reader, that what you’re reading is my personal interpretation of Krishna’s divine song to Arjuna after I went through three different interpretations. I’m a teacher of literature by profession. It’s only natural that I read any book as a work of literature. Forgive me if your religious sentiments are brittle. Take my writing as an opportunity for you to exercise the most divine virtue of forgiveness.

Back to Karma, once again.

Karma is action in simple words. We cannot but act. Life is action. Krishna goes to the extent of saying that even not acting is action as long as you are not free from impulses and passions. You cannot escape from action; you can only escape from the passions that drive them. What is evil is not action, but the motive.

Your motive will be right when you know that you and your enemy out there and the entire cosmos is an extension of the divine.

Sanatana dharma is nothing but the presence of divinity, wherever it is. When that divinity is disturbed by inappropriate human actions, there is disharmony, adharma. We have to bring back the harmony. That bringing back of the harmony is now Arjuna’s duty. Arjuna’s karma.

Arjuna is still not convinced. I am not either. A lot of questions arise. Where do I find the divine presence in the first place? I look around. There is more religion today than in my youth. But life was far more peaceful and joyful in those old days even though the politicians were corrupt. Now I realise with dismay that corruption is better than religion. There are more temples and idols now. There are more books being sold on religion now. And yet there is hardly any divinity to be experienced. What does dharma mean anymore?

I stand bewildered at the end of Part One of the Gita. There are two more parts left for my study. I shall study them too. I have the time now, having retired from teaching. I will return here tomorrow with the next lesson I learn from the Gita – from part 2: chapters 7-12. But I repeat: my learning is personal. If only everyone’s religious learning was personal, the world would have been a far, far better place!

Comments

  1. Well done tomichan. now you have the time and energy and to passion to study rather learn. Although I cannot agree eith many of your postings a I am interested in them. In my opinion the Karma based on Dharma make the world a plesent one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm yet to find a person who agrees with my views 😊

      Delete
  2. I imagine one day I'll read one of the religious books. I doubt it'll happen, but I imagine it. I think the important thing is for you to get something out of the study. It sounds like you're learning something even if it's not what those of the religion might wish it to be.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I keep saying some time I will read the christian bible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its been one on my list for a long time, each time I start, I find a reason to pause with a promise to come back again :) .. Nice to see your progress through it - look forward to the next post :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure to complete it by tomorrow or the day after. As I said, mine is a secular reading.

      Delete
  5. karmapatra

    Karmapatra Foundation Indore: Leading NGO promoting KARMA and HUMANITY. Join us in empowering communities and making a difference. Learn more about our initiatives today!

    To Get More Information - Karmapatrafoundation.orgname

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...