One
of the most delightful essays of George Orwell is ‘Why
I Write’ which I read as a young student of a creative writing course of
IGNOU. With ruthless candidness Orwell identifies “sheer egoism” as the first
reason for his writing. “Desire to seem clever, to be talked about, to be
remembered after death, to get your own back on grown-ups who snubbed you in
childhood, etc…” Orwell goes on to say that “It is humbug to pretend this is
not a motive, and a strong one.”
I embrace Orwell wholeheartedly here. I am an inveterate egoist in the
above Orwellian sense, every bit of it including those grown-ups, and that egoism
probably remains at the top of my list too if you hurl on my face the question why
I write. But that can’t be the sole reason for any worthwhile writer. Orwell
has listed a few more of them in his essay and I won’t ever dare to dispute any
of them.
Political purpose is mentioned as the last point by Orwell. He defines
it as “Desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other people’s
idea of the kind of society that they should strive after.” My writing has been
driven by this political purpose ever since Mr Modi ascended the throne in
Indraprastha. It is because I don’t accept the kind of politics that Mr Modi
practises. Mr Modi made me a political writer.
Even otherwise there was a didactic element in my writings, I don’t
deny. Bernard Shaw is one writer who defended his didacticism fanatically. I
don’t write anything unless it is to teach something, he declared. [I can’t
recall his exact words.] I can say the same about my writing too.
I don’t claim to be wise, however. If I write like a teacher, it is not
because I think I know more than anyone else. It is rather because I feel I
have a right to express my views in a world of people who are capable of
thinking. Moreover, I am a teacher by profession. I know that I have influenced
(and continue to do so) quite many young minds as a teacher. I would like to do
the same with adults as a writer. Forgive me if this ambition sounds vain or
presumptuous.
I have been told too many times by friends and well-wishers that my
writing tends to be too acerbic to do good. The acid is not intended. Not
usually, at least. Writing is not an entirely conscious process. The roots of your
words lie in your subconscious mind. The acid belongs there too. I must borrow
from Shaw once again here: “I do not know what I think until I write it.”
Frankly, I don’t write with the conscious intention to hurt anyone, not
even Mr Modi whom I consider as one of the most inferior minds that ever sat on
the country’s prime throne. Modi is the antithesis of all that I value: the Enlightenment ideals.
When the most powerful person in your country turns out to be the exterminator of
all that you hold sacred, your heart will be on fire. Acid will flow in your
veins.
I write in order to cling to those ideals which are being exterminated. I
write primarily to salvage my own heart.
PS. Thanks to Sonia Dogra [one of the gentlest souls I
ever came to know in the virtual world] who tagged me in Facebook to a post by
another blogger friend, Deepa Gopal, [a
genius with the brush and the pen] which in turn made me write this.
This is the most candid response I have read. While I think Orwell went a little too far when citing his reasons, I do agree that all writers nurture a silent ambition of recognition. Some are brave enough to accept. Sometimes not getting enough recognition makes us say stuff like 'write because I must' or just for the love of it. But then we cannot deny that all writers including Orwell must have started only for the love of writing. Once the recognition came along, the desire for more probably came along.
ReplyDeleteOn another note I've just started the creative writing course from IGNOU. Just because you mentioned it. Thank you for your kind mention of my space here.
Writing comes as natural as breathing to writers. People look for reasons and find them. Orwell did that. Shaw too. You and I too. I'm sure all of us love some appreciation from our readers. But even when that doesn't come, we still go on precisely because ultimately we write because we can't but do that.
DeleteI hope IGNOU maintains its original standards. I joined the university 10 years ago, as a 50-year-old, for their MA Psychology course was disappointed terribly with the substandard course materials and even instructional processes. Most of the notes were simply plagiarised stuff. Some were not even correct. I pointed it out to the professors and I was penalised for that. I didn't complete the course in the end.
I appreciate the way you have candidly spelled out as to why you write. As for me, I always write for my heart's content in order to vent my stuffiness out. My writings are meant for me, therefore it doesn't matter to me even if they aren't read by others.
ReplyDeleteSublimation of feelings is one solid reason for most writers, I'm sure. That gives you a joy which doesn't depend on what comes from the readers. But I'm sure happy with more readers if I can get them. As it is, my viewership is good though the interaction is not.
DeleteLove how you quoted that you write to salvage your own heart. Much as every writer craves for recognition, not obtaining it still wouldn't stop one from writing, for ultimately we write for ourselves.
ReplyDeleteTrue, Dashy. Ultimately it's about our sense of fulfilment, a self-gratification. That is one reason why we can't play to the gallery, I suppose. I'd get more readers if I'm ready to change my tune a bit. But I can't do that. I can't be unfaithful to my heart.
DeleteWhile we are indulging in abstracts, you are quite specific! Sir, you are intensely candid. I totally agree with what Sonia says! Orwell does seem to have got carried away... and we all do at some point, I guess! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the mention Sir! I truly touched!
Orwell had reasons to get carried away. After all, he lived "down and out in Paris and London" until he became a successful writer.
Delete