Skip to main content

The Tyranny of Merit

 





Book Review

The Tyranny of Merit

Author: Michael J Sandel

Merit is not always right. It generates winners and losers and often creates hubris among the winners and resentment among the losers. Moreover, there is something immoral about handing over the world to a group of people who possess certain qualities (merits) just by luck.

Michael Sandel is a political philosopher at Harvard University and author of many books. His latest book, The Tyranny of Merit [2020], is an incisive critique of meritocracy.

Our world places much premium on merit. Students are admitted to premier institutions on the basis of their merit which is assessed by highly challenging tests. Jobs are allotted also on the basis of merit. Merit is important, no doubt. It ensures efficiency and fairness. Those who are more capable should be given greater responsibilities. It also promotes aspiration and individual freedom (freedom to forge one’s own destiny). It is also morally comforting: we feel that we get what we deserve. Fine enough. But meritocracy has its dark side too.

Sandel argues that meritocracy is not a remedy for inequality but a justification for inequality. It is not much different from aristocracy which justified and sustained inequality on the basis of birth. You are born into a particular family without your choice or knowledge and that accident determines your fate: that is aristocracy. If you are born rich, you are a winner in that system. Otherwise you are a goner. You have no choice.

Meritocracy gives us the illusion of choice. If you work hard, you can make it: meritocracy exhorts. Really? Sandel doesn’t agree. He thinks that the role of effort is inflated in meritocracy. Your talents matter more, much more. And your talents are not your choice. Your talents are your luck. Letting luck determine one’s destiny is no better than letting the accident of birth do it.

Sandel gives detailed statistical and other researched data to show how meritocracy has led to credentialism. Credentialism is belief or reliance on academic or other formal qualifications as the best measure of a person’s intelligence or ability to do a particular job. Many American Presidents like Clinton and Obama emphasised on the importance of education in forging one’s destiny. Sandel argues that this focus on education is not fair. It shifts the blame saying: “Inequality is not a failure of the system; it is a failure of you.”

This blame-shifting engenders many severe problems the foremost of which is self-hatred or loss of self-esteem. It is the resentment of such people who felt left out because of insufficient educational qualifications that led to the victory of Donald Trump as President and to Brexit, argues Sandel. He has the statistics too to prove his point.

Educational qualification needn’t matter so much, however. British Prime Minister Clement Attlee was an Oxford graduate. But his foreign secretary Ernest Bevin had left school at the age of 11. The leader of the House of Commons at that time, Herbert Morrison, did not have education beyond the age of 14. Aneurin Bevan, health minister, left school at 13 and worked as a miner.

This is not to discredit education, of course. Education is important. But there are other equally important matters too. The world should belong to everyone, even the less gifted. And the handicapped. And the disabled. And… That’s important too.

Sandel shows us that even academic scores have a correlation with wealth. “The higher your family income, the higher your SAT score,” he puts it as bluntly as that. There are people who pay as much as $1000 per hour for one-to-one tutoring for SAT. Academics is a billion-dollar industry. Therefore, education is not all about the intellect.

Meritocracy is not as much about merit as we pretend. Many other factors are at play. Your success in a meritocratic system is not as much a result of your own effort as you imagine. There are many more talented people out there who don’t get the opportunities you got.

If the successful people internalise that fact – that they are not all self-made winners – half the problem may be solved. After all, changes begin from attitudes. If I know that I am here as a winner because of sheer good fortune, I will be more concerned about my fellow human beings. That concern can make a lot of difference to the world.

This is an excellent book that deserves to be read by all the winners and policy makers. Almost all the examples and research data come from America.  But the vision is universal.

 

PS. Thanks to Jose Maliekal, professor of philosophy, author of Standstill Utopias and a good friend for sending me a free digital copy of this book.

Comments

  1. Sonia DograNovember 28, 2020 at 3:47 PM

    I cannot agree more. The divide that meritocracy creates, can lead to loathe for the system as well as oneself. It begins right away in schools. At least Indian schools. The realization that my achievement is more a matter of my luck or whatever will at least keep me grounded and more compassionate. After all, there is no dearth of talent. It's the other things that don't add up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalNovember 28, 2020 at 4:38 PM

      The author cites statistics to show that the students of good universities in the US are rather contemptuous of their less educated counterparts. So this happens not only in India.

      Humility is a virtue that the author mentions explicitly at the end. So you sync with him wholly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...
12 comments
Read more

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...
7 comments
Read more

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...
6 comments
Read more

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...
8 comments
Read more