Skip to main content

The Tyranny of Merit

 





Book Review

The Tyranny of Merit

Author: Michael J Sandel

Merit is not always right. It generates winners and losers and often creates hubris among the winners and resentment among the losers. Moreover, there is something immoral about handing over the world to a group of people who possess certain qualities (merits) just by luck.

Michael Sandel is a political philosopher at Harvard University and author of many books. His latest book, The Tyranny of Merit [2020], is an incisive critique of meritocracy.

Our world places much premium on merit. Students are admitted to premier institutions on the basis of their merit which is assessed by highly challenging tests. Jobs are allotted also on the basis of merit. Merit is important, no doubt. It ensures efficiency and fairness. Those who are more capable should be given greater responsibilities. It also promotes aspiration and individual freedom (freedom to forge one’s own destiny). It is also morally comforting: we feel that we get what we deserve. Fine enough. But meritocracy has its dark side too.

Sandel argues that meritocracy is not a remedy for inequality but a justification for inequality. It is not much different from aristocracy which justified and sustained inequality on the basis of birth. You are born into a particular family without your choice or knowledge and that accident determines your fate: that is aristocracy. If you are born rich, you are a winner in that system. Otherwise you are a goner. You have no choice.

Meritocracy gives us the illusion of choice. If you work hard, you can make it: meritocracy exhorts. Really? Sandel doesn’t agree. He thinks that the role of effort is inflated in meritocracy. Your talents matter more, much more. And your talents are not your choice. Your talents are your luck. Letting luck determine one’s destiny is no better than letting the accident of birth do it.

Sandel gives detailed statistical and other researched data to show how meritocracy has led to credentialism. Credentialism is belief or reliance on academic or other formal qualifications as the best measure of a person’s intelligence or ability to do a particular job. Many American Presidents like Clinton and Obama emphasised on the importance of education in forging one’s destiny. Sandel argues that this focus on education is not fair. It shifts the blame saying: “Inequality is not a failure of the system; it is a failure of you.”

This blame-shifting engenders many severe problems the foremost of which is self-hatred or loss of self-esteem. It is the resentment of such people who felt left out because of insufficient educational qualifications that led to the victory of Donald Trump as President and to Brexit, argues Sandel. He has the statistics too to prove his point.

Educational qualification needn’t matter so much, however. British Prime Minister Clement Attlee was an Oxford graduate. But his foreign secretary Ernest Bevin had left school at the age of 11. The leader of the House of Commons at that time, Herbert Morrison, did not have education beyond the age of 14. Aneurin Bevan, health minister, left school at 13 and worked as a miner.

This is not to discredit education, of course. Education is important. But there are other equally important matters too. The world should belong to everyone, even the less gifted. And the handicapped. And the disabled. And… That’s important too.

Sandel shows us that even academic scores have a correlation with wealth. “The higher your family income, the higher your SAT score,” he puts it as bluntly as that. There are people who pay as much as $1000 per hour for one-to-one tutoring for SAT. Academics is a billion-dollar industry. Therefore, education is not all about the intellect.

Meritocracy is not as much about merit as we pretend. Many other factors are at play. Your success in a meritocratic system is not as much a result of your own effort as you imagine. There are many more talented people out there who don’t get the opportunities you got.

If the successful people internalise that fact – that they are not all self-made winners – half the problem may be solved. After all, changes begin from attitudes. If I know that I am here as a winner because of sheer good fortune, I will be more concerned about my fellow human beings. That concern can make a lot of difference to the world.

This is an excellent book that deserves to be read by all the winners and policy makers. Almost all the examples and research data come from America.  But the vision is universal.

 

PS. Thanks to Jose Maliekal, professor of philosophy, author of Standstill Utopias and a good friend for sending me a free digital copy of this book.

Comments

  1. Sonia DograNovember 28, 2020 at 3:47 PM

    I cannot agree more. The divide that meritocracy creates, can lead to loathe for the system as well as oneself. It begins right away in schools. At least Indian schools. The realization that my achievement is more a matter of my luck or whatever will at least keep me grounded and more compassionate. After all, there is no dearth of talent. It's the other things that don't add up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalNovember 28, 2020 at 4:38 PM

      The author cites statistics to show that the students of good universities in the US are rather contemptuous of their less educated counterparts. So this happens not only in India.

      Humility is a virtue that the author mentions explicitly at the end. So you sync with him wholly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...
39 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...
30 comments
Read more

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...
28 comments
Read more