With a Khasi couple [middle two] - circa1990 |
One of the many responses to my last post is given below.
I thought of giving it a personal reply
since it was a personal query. On second thought, I concluded that a public
response would be better since many people might have similar queries some of
which cast aspersions on the indigenous people of Shillong.
The most
important clarification I have to make is that my problems in Shillong were not
created by the indigenous people of Shillong at all. The Khasis who are the
indigenous people can be as friendly as they can be hostile. It depends on how
you deal with them. They are tribal people and there is a certain degree of
clannishness in their outlooks. That comes, I believe, from some sort of
insecurity feeling coupled with an inferiority complex that seems to run deep
in the tribe, particularly among the menfolk.
If one of
their own scholars, Kynpham Sing Nonkynrih, whose voluminous book on the Khasis
I reviewed
recently, is to be believed, the advent of Christianity corrupted the Khasi
culture by superseding the position of the man in the Khasi matrilineal system with
the Christian priest or pastor. The man became redundant, so to say, in matters
that really mattered – cultural affairs, particularly.
Even at home,
the man’s position was undermined. “[W]hen Khasi men marry, what do they get
out of wedlock?” One of Nongkynrih’s characters asks. “Nothing! Their children
are not their own! They cannot even identify with them.” The children get the
mother’s surname. Even the house belongs to the woman of the family. The man is
a nobody at home.
Whatever the
role played by Christianity in this undermining of the position of the Khasi
male, the situation led to a lot of frustration among the menfolk. In the 15
years that I lived in Shillong, I experienced hostility of varying degrees from
the menfolk of the Khasi tribe while the women were exceptionally cordial. The male
hostility owed itself to the potential threat that the nontribal male posed to
the Khasi male. Nongkynrih makes it abundantly clear in his book how the Khasi
women were more drawn to nontribal men for various reasons which I don’t want
to enumerate here.
So, to answer
my friend who raised the above questions, not all Khasis are unfriendly. The
women are very friendly. Probably because they don’t suffer from the insecurity
and inferiority of the men. And most men are friendly too, especially those who
have achieved success in some field or the other – professionally, socially,
etc. Like in every society, among the Khasis too there are many disgruntled
elements and they create problems. The uniqueness of the situation in Shillong
makes it look like acute xenophobia.
I left
Shillong in early 2001. The place must have undergone many changes in the last
two decades. I am told that it has become more receptive to people from
outside, especially visitors and tourists. Jobs may not be available for
outsiders [dkhars, as nontribal people are called by Khasis] anymore. There must
be qualified indigenous people now for most jobs.
There was
intrinsic distrust of nontribal people in the olden days. I am told that this
distrust has not vaporized yet. I guess that runs deep in the collective
unconscious of the people and won’t vanish soon. It will take generations and a
lot of amiable mingling of cultures. There has been a lot of mingling of
cultures and an undesirable degree of miscegenation. But not much of it has
been perceived as healthy for the tribe by the menfolk.
As I said
earlier, I cannot speak for the present situation in the place. I am not a
firsthand witness anymore. I tried to answer the queries put to me. I thought
it’s necessary to clarify one thing at least: the personal problems I mention
sometimes when I write about my Shillong days were not caused by the inherent
xenophobia of the Khasi male – not significantly at least. My problems were
partly a creation of my own personal flaws and partly of the nontribal men with
excessive missionary zeal. These men took it upon themselves the arduous job of
“civilizing or reforming” me. It was their will against mine. It was lose-lose
situation in the end. But that’s my personal loss, never mind.
Thank you sir. You have made me known what I wanted to know and beyond it.
ReplyDeleteGlad I answered you.
Delete