Skip to main content

Art dies when...

By Gemini AI


“Is there any politician who is a poet or artist of any sort?” Anu asks me. Anu – Anushri is her official name – is a former student of mine. She gave up science though she was good at it and took up literature for graduation after which she pursued a journalism course with a prominent media house and then became a journalist.

There are a few of them, I tell her. I name Vaclav Havel and our very own Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

Anu thinks I am joking when I mention Vajpayee because she knows how much I detest Vajpayee’s political party to which the present Prime Minister of India belongs.

“Did Vajpayee write any good poetry?” Anu asks.

“I’m not sure,” I say. “He wrote stuff like: क़दम मिलाकर चलना होगा। We will have to go forward together.” I remember one or two such lines of Vajpayee from my teaching days in Delhi. My students there used to recite such stuff in the morning assembly.  

“That sounds more like politics than poetry,” Anu protests.

I meet Anu once in a while in a café outside her newspaper office. Our conversations are usually brief because she is busy unlike me who is a relaxed retired teacher. But today Anu seems to be having some time on her hands.

“Have you heard of Rimbaud?” I ask.

“You never mentioned that name in class, I’m sure,” she says.

“I didn’t. He wasn’t worth mentioning. He could have been a great poet. But his poetry died the moment he came in contact with politics.”

Arthur Rimbaud. French poet who made the whirling world stand still with his poetry before he turned twenty. I couldn’t have mentioned him in my classes. He betrayed poetry. He betrayed love. He became a trader. Of weapons. Of humans.

He abandoned poetry at the age of 20 and took to selling arms and slaves. He left France a few years after Otto von Bismarck invaded his country and went to Africa. Did Bismarck’s power kill his poetry or did Africa’s helplessness do it? I’m not sure.

“He realised that the sword was mightier than the pen?” Anu asks. That’s Anu. Now you know why I love her so much. Sometimes I think she is my alter ego.

“Maybe he realised that poetry was as bourgeoisie as politics. And religion.”

“There you are! Literature, religion, politics – all three belong ultimately to those who wield the power, right?”

I smile. “Genuine literature dissents,” I say. “Rimbaud was too young to understand that.”

“That’s it,” Anu cries out as if she is Archimedes in the bathtub that brought him his Eureka moment. “Dissent is what art is.”

“Assent is what politics is. Religion too. Assent to dogma, credo, and protocol.” And then I ask, “Do you know that Hitler was an artist before he became a politician?”

“What?”

“Yes.”

Comments

  1. Many of us lose art as we lose our youth. It's permitted in youth. But when you "grow up" you have to do something that you can make a living at.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes, I'd have perished long ago if I hoped to eke out a living from writing.

      Delete
  2. Hari Om
    ....and there are those who go the other way. The fashion these days is for ex-MPs to write their memoir, though that's less literature, more vendetta quite often. As for art, Winston Churchill was pretty handy with oils and canvas... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Churchill was an exception, I think. Or maybe the times have changed. Now Trump is the rule.

      Delete
  3. Artists are of a genre. They can become very good at art or a politician! And then they do it good!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...