Skip to main content

Shoah and Al-Nakba


Shoah is the Hebrew word for catastrophe.  Al-Nakba is the Arabic word for the same thing.  The Israelis use Shoah to mean the Holocaust.  The Palestinians use al-Nakba to refer to their exodus caused by the creation of Israel.  Shoah created al-Nakba; one catastrophe led to the other.  The victims of one catastrophe created another catastrophe and its victims.  6 million Jews were the victims of Shoah and their relatives uprooted 700,000 Arabs from their homes in Palestine.  The latter figure has kept on increasing since the Nakba has not ended.  In the words of Anton La Guardia (whose book on the issue was the basis of a former blog of mine), “The wandering Jew found a home, while the homeless Palestinians still wander the Middle East.”  La Guardia wrote that in 2002.  Twelve years down the line, the Jews are so well settled in their homes that they are in a position to eliminate the remaining Palestinians.

One catastrophe leads to another.  The only difference is the way people perceive them.  What is Shoah for the Jews was victory for the Nazis, and what is al-Nakba for the Palestinians is victory for the Jews.  Is it not possible to have victory for ourselves without defeat of others?  Is it not possible for human beings to cooperate instead of compete? 

In 1982, after the Israeli Defence Force destroyed Arafat’s headquarters in Beirut, Prime Minister Menachem Begin wrote to US President Ronald Reagan saying he felt as if he had destroyed Hitler’s bunkers.

‘As ifs’ matter much in history.  ‘As ifs’ carry the pain of ancient wounds that refused to heal.  ‘As ifs’ cause the demolition of a masjid in Ayodhya or the destruction of the Buddhas in Bamiyan or Lucknow.  ‘As ifs’ are the ghosts of the past that need be exorcised from people’s collective psyche. 

Can the devils be totally exorcised from the human psyche, however?  If God is part of the psyche, Satan has to be the inevitable counterpart.  In 1998, when a Tel Aviv University study found that anti-Semitism was on a decline in the world, Avi Becker, the executive manager of the World Jewish Congress office in Israel, said the situation was “good for the Jews, but bad for Judaism.”  What he implied is a general truth: that without some enemy, real or perceived, religions cannot survive

India needs Pakistan for the survival of Hindutva just as much as Pakistan needs India for the survival of Islamic fundamentalism.  And the mutual need is rooted in enmity.  Enemies make religions stronger.  Would Christianity have grown as much as it did without the oppression it faced in its nascent stages?

The enemy satisfies both the God and the Satan that inhabit the psyche of the believers.  Israel is the best illustration.  As La Guardia says, “It [Israel] is both victim and aggressor, underdog and bully, deeply insecure and supremely arrogant, a democracy and an abuser of human rights.  The Israelis can one moment argue that Arab countries present a mortal threat to Israel, and the next threaten to blow up their capitals into dust.”

Osama bin Laden and his terrorists had/have the same schizophrenia.  Analyse any religious fundamentalist, and you will discover the same schizophrenic.  God and Satan cannot be separated.  Separating them is one of the greatest tragedies that has plagued mankind ever since the beginning of human civilisation.  Gods cannot survive without Devils.

Is there any remedy?  Let me borrow the answer given by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, History Professor and author, “After all the disillusionments with the history of civilizations is studded – the triumphs of savagery, the bloodlettings of barbarism, the reversals of progress, the reconquests by nature, our failure to improve – there is no remedy except to go on trying, and keeping civilized traditions alive.” [Civilizations, Pan Books, 2001, the last page]


Comments

  1. Loved this post. Very relevant with happenings in Gaza!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The recent events in Gaza made me read La Guardia's book again after a gap of a decade. Most of these thoughts came from that book. The God-Satan philosophy is mine.

      Delete


  2. First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
    -Martin Niemoller

    These lines, written in a page of an office notepad was given to me by my Dad your article somehow made me remember this. Great Blog!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Datta, for sharing the lines here. Most of us follow that policy of non-interference as long as we feel we are safe. Diplomacy is no more a political concept; it has seeped into individual life too. We don't want to make any commitment except for our own welfare.

      Delete
  3. One catastrophe leads to another and we just don't know where to stop. We use each others religion to fight and shed blood and are forgetting the basics of any religion which is peace, harmony and love. At times I feel we are the most confused and malleable species of all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Athena, for most people religion has nothing to do with peace, harmony and love. For them, religion is a source of identity. That's why when identity is threatened, violence breaks out in religious forms. For the Arabian Islam, the West posed a severe identity threat. Hindutva was engendered by a similar identity threat.

      There are a few individuals (compared to the vast majority) who have established their individual identity so securely that they don't need the identity given by their religion or any other source. For them, the meaning of religion can become more meaningful like peace, harmony, etc.

      Delete
  4. There is a remedy -- a remedy of samesightedness. God and Satan are not two different entities but two sides of the same as sides of a coin. It is our inability to see the whole picture that creates trouble and fight. They're not opposites but complementary. I do not agree with that without some enemy, real or perceived, religions cannot survive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ravish, the problem is that religions polarise good and evil into God and Satan, whereas they both belong to the same reality - "two sides of the same coin". That leads to the need for creation of the enemy, because the enemy has to be externalised. So Pakistan becomes the enemy, the evil which is outside of us. America becomes the enemy of Islam, far away from "us"... For those people who make the mistake of externalising the evil by polarising good and evil, the enemy outside becomes essential.

      Delete
    2. I differ a bit from you, Matheikal. Religions don't polarize. There are a few who forged the meaning of some verses of religious scriptures and utilize them in uniting a group against someone. USA is not enemy of Islam but a few terrorists. It is not fair to put a blot on a religion because of a few maniacs.

      Delete
  5. The devil of all is ego. It can be conquered at individual level. But when it becomes the cause of a clan or community or country wars happen. Nobody is powerful enough to conquer it then. I had this dream of whole world getting washed down by waters yesterday night. I guess that is the only solution when it reaches the pinnacle until then as Felipe said- keep trying..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roohi, your comment is an expression of what I've said above in answer to Athena in different words. You speak in terms of ego of the individual and of the community. I called it identity.

      Ego is unavoidable to some extent. It is related to self-respect. Inflated ego is the problem. In the case of America, I can agree with you that inflated ego of a community (nation) becomes the cause of much strife in the world.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Glad to see what you feel.Correct in these circumstances

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it just my feeling, R? Is it correct only in these circumstances?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Blind Lady’s Descendants

Book Review Title: The Blind Lady’s Descendants Author: Anees Salim Publisher: Penguin India 2015 Pages: 301 Price: Rs 399 A metaphorical blindness is part of most people’s lives.  We fail to see many things and hence live partial lives.  We make our lives as well as those of others miserable with our blindness.  Anees Salim’s novel which won the Raymond & Crossword award for fiction in 2014 explores the role played by blindness in the lives of a few individuals most of whom belong to the family of Hamsa and Asma.  The couple are not on talking terms for “eighteen years,” according to the mother.  When Amar, the youngest son and narrator of the novel, points out that he is only sixteen, Asma reduces it to fifteen and then to ten years when Amar refers to the child that was born a few years after him though it did not survive.  Dark humour spills out of every page of the book.  For example: How reckless Akmal was!  Sleeping with his mouth wide open righ

Romancing the Past

A few years back, when I was teaching Jack Finney’s story The Third Level in a section of grade 12, I put a question to the entire class: “If you get a chance to live in another time, which would you choose – past or future?” Ann [not her real name] put up her hand first. “Future,” she said. In Finney’s story, Charley chooses to go back to Galesburg of 1894. He loves those big old frame houses, huge lawns, and tremendous trees with branches roofing the streets. It’s a ‘cool’ place whose evenings were “twice as long.” Life was a relaxed affair. People had time to sit out in the evenings, sipping tea and playing music on their guitars. There would be fireflies all around. Peaceful world. Charley wanted that world. My question to the class was in relation to that description of an old world. “My father speaks about the horrors of his childhood,” Ann said. “There was poverty. Not enough food to eat, no proper clothes to wear, no vehicles to carry you… Who wants to go back there?” An

Kashmir and Politics

Book Title: Farooq of Kashmir Authors: Ashwini Bhatnagar & R C Ganjoo Publisher: Fingerprint, New Delhi, 2023 Pages: 330 This book is much more than a biography of Farooq Abdullah. It is a short history of the trouble-torn Kashmir. Though Farooq remains at the centre of the history, his father Sheikh Abdullah is given ample space in the first few chapters. Towards the end of the book, Farooq’s son Omar gets due attention too. Kashmir went through a lot of pain and misery ever since India became independent. Its political leaders as well as their religious counterparts were mostly responsible for all that pain and misery. Add to that the nefarious role played by the neighbouring country of Pakistan. Pakistan has been a thorn in the very heart of Kashmir right from Independence. The political leaders and religious terrorists of that country have left no stone unturned to make Kashmir their own. Understanding Kashmir’s unique condition, independent India had given the st

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Happy Women's Day

I have had more female colleagues than males in my entire teaching career. Probably why I survived so long in the job. Let me celebrate this Women's Day with them. I haven't been able to get hold of the pics all of them and I express my immense grief on leaving out quite many.  That's my first school where I was a math teacher. You may not recognise me. I'm the second one from left in the last row. This was St Joseph's School, Shillong. I learnt the art of teaching in that school. It was a convent school with only girl students. I still remember a lot of them, my first students. I know I wasn't very kind to them. Math teachers can't be kind - that was what I thought in those days. My own teachers had created that impression in my consciousness and the subconscious as well. All those girls are now mothers and some of them may be grandmothers. Let me tell them that I never meant any harm. I was happy in those days to see them learning math well. Hi, dear ladie