“... the worst thing of all is
religious proselytism, which paralyses: 'I am talking with you in order to
persuade you,' No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own
identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytising.”
It is Pope Francis who said it in a
recent interview
he gave to an Argentine weekly. The
Catholic Church was the foremost champion of religious conversions for
centuries. The Church now has a
visionary leader in the person of the Pope.
What reminded me of the interview is a
report that appeared on the front page of today’s Hindu with the headline, BJP,
Parivar outfits to intensify campaign against ‘love jihad’. The last paragraph of the report reads:
“On
December 23, the martyrdom day of Swami Shraddhanand (the leader of the 19th
century Shuddhi (re-conversion) movement) we will convert Muslims to Hinduism
in at least 50 locations in west UP” he [Rajeshwar Singh, coordinator of
Religious Awakening, an affiliate of the RSS] said. “On December 25, the day when Christians
convert people to their religion, this year, we will do the reverse – by converting
them back to Hinduism. In two-three
years, the rural hinterland will be free of Christians.” Asked how he planned to convince people to
become Hindus, he said, “It will be a test of who is stronger, Hindus or
them. You just wait and watch.”
The irony is striking. The supreme leader of the religion which was
the champion of religious conversions in the bygone era is saying that
religious conversion is “the worst thing” and in the India of the electronic
era a leader of a religion which was against religious conversions of any form
(including intra-religion conversions: from one caste to another) is
threatening us with forced conversions.
“My instincts tell me that Modi will only work for
the corporate sector and use one particular religious community for furthering
his ends. Modi will engender a civil war in the country if he becomes its
Prime Minister, my instincts predict.” I
wrote this in a blog on Feb 16, much before Mr Modi
was ensconced on the throne in Indraprastha.
My instincts are perturbed again now. People like Rajeshwar Singh and organisations
like Religious Awakening don’t enter the front page of national dailies without
powerful political backing. I hope time
will prove my instincts wrong. Let there
be peace and harmony in the country. “Let
noble thoughts come to us from every side,” as Rig Veda says (1:89-i).
Is it worthwhile to fall back on religion in order
to achieve any objective in the contemporary world which is driven by science
and technology? Why are people like
Rajeshwar Singh unable to understand that the religion, particularly the kind
that is propped up by him, is a regressive agency in today’s global society?
The answer is evident to anyone who has studied
history in some detail. The answer is
that it is not about religion at all. It
is about political power. Religion has
become the handmaiden of political power umpteen times in history, each with disastrous
consequences to certain segments of populations.
R G Collingwood, professor of metaphysics, defined
civilisation as an attitude (in
contradistinction to process or progress) which tends to create a
society that is “less violent, more scientific and more welcoming to outsiders”
[as quoted by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto in his massive book, Civilizations].
When science and its technology have pervaded every
aspect of our lives, when countries have opened up their borders to people from
anywhere, when the whole world is aspiring to move towards a global human
society, why are some people in India thinking of driving a wedge between
communities?
Is a religious identity important to India
anymore? If it indeed is important, then
the best advice is what I quoted at the beginning of this blog. Not conversion but attraction. Attract people to your religion by your good
deeds. Let your light so shine that
people are drawn towards it naturally. Force
is an outdated concept among people who possess the attitude called
civilisation.
The leadership of a country indirectly decides What kind of people and groups become active in a country . Under the present leadership we can expect a lot of these regressive people and groups. They whould do well to remember that correcting the mistakes of the past is not by repeating the same mistakes.
ReplyDeletePernicious elements in a country get their pep pills the moment their leaders come to power. There must be many people who took part in the Gujarat riots of 2002 that are now forming organisations like Religious Awakening. Unless Mr Modi puts his foot down and opens his heart wide, we're going to witness a dark period soon in the history of the country. But certain appointments and promotions made recently prove that Mr Modi is not going to put any of his organs in the right places.
DeleteI too am very worried on this account.
ReplyDeleteI have lots of hope in Modi oovt. hope they don't ruin this country with petty issues like this.
Anyone in the right mind has ample reasons to worry, Indrani. Let's still hope.
Delete*govt
ReplyDeletei too had high hopes with Modi Government....thought that once he dons himself with sceptre and crown, he would come forth with a positive and impartial view...but I'm worried now....
ReplyDeleteMani, your phrase "sceptre and crown" conveys more than what an ordinary reader would understand. And that's exactly what I meant by using words like "ensconced" and "Indraprastha".
DeleteWonderfully presented. Very compelling thoughts...
ReplyDeleteVery glad to welcome you to this space, Siddharth.
Delete