Skip to main content

Religious conversion: outdated concept


“... the worst thing of all is religious proselytism, which paralyses: 'I am talking with you in order to persuade you,' No. Each person dialogues, starting with his and her own identity. The church grows by attraction, not proselytising.”

It is Pope Francis who said it in a recent interview he gave to an Argentine weekly.  The Catholic Church was the foremost champion of religious conversions for centuries.  The Church now has a visionary leader in the person of the Pope. 

What reminded me of the interview is a report that appeared on the front page of today’s Hindu with the headline, BJP, Parivar outfits to intensify campaign against ‘love jihad’.  The last paragraph of the report reads:

“On December 23, the martyrdom day of Swami Shraddhanand (the leader of the 19th century Shuddhi (re-conversion) movement) we will convert Muslims to Hinduism in at least 50 locations in west UP” he [Rajeshwar Singh, coordinator of Religious Awakening, an affiliate of the RSS] said.  “On December 25, the day when Christians convert people to their religion, this year, we will do the reverse – by converting them back to Hinduism.  In two-three years, the rural hinterland will be free of Christians.”  Asked how he planned to convince people to become Hindus, he said, “It will be a test of who is stronger, Hindus or them.  You just wait and watch.”

The irony is striking.  The supreme leader of the religion which was the champion of religious conversions in the bygone era is saying that religious conversion is “the worst thing” and in the India of the electronic era a leader of a religion which was against religious conversions of any form (including intra-religion conversions: from one caste to another) is threatening us with forced conversions. 

“My instincts tell me that Modi will only work for the corporate sector and use one particular religious community for furthering his ends.  Modi will engender a civil war in the country if he becomes its Prime Minister, my instincts predict.”  I wrote this in a blog on Feb 16, much before Mr Modi was ensconced on the throne in Indraprastha.  My instincts are perturbed again now.  People like Rajeshwar Singh and organisations like Religious Awakening don’t enter the front page of national dailies without powerful political backing.  I hope time will prove my instincts wrong.  Let there be peace and harmony in the country.  “Let noble thoughts come to us from every side,” as Rig Veda says (1:89-i).

Is it worthwhile to fall back on religion in order to achieve any objective in the contemporary world which is driven by science and technology?  Why are people like Rajeshwar Singh unable to understand that the religion, particularly the kind that is propped up by him, is a regressive agency in today’s global society?

The answer is evident to anyone who has studied history in some detail.  The answer is that it is not about religion at all.  It is about political power.  Religion has become the handmaiden of political power umpteen times in history, each with disastrous consequences to certain segments of populations. 

R G Collingwood, professor of metaphysics, defined civilisation as an attitude (in contradistinction to process or progress) which tends to create a society that is “less violent, more scientific and more welcoming to outsiders” [as quoted by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto in his massive book, Civilizations].

When science and its technology have pervaded every aspect of our lives, when countries have opened up their borders to people from anywhere, when the whole world is aspiring to move towards a global human society, why are some people in India thinking of driving a wedge between communities?


Is a religious identity important to India anymore?  If it indeed is important, then the best advice is what I quoted at the beginning of this blog.  Not conversion but attraction.  Attract people to your religion by your good deeds.  Let your light so shine that people are drawn towards it naturally.  Force is an outdated concept among people who possess the attitude called civilisation. 
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM

    The leadership of a country indirectly decides What kind of people and groups become active in a country . Under the present leadership we can expect a lot of these regressive people and groups. They whould do well to remember that correcting the mistakes of the past is not by repeating the same mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM

      Pernicious elements in a country get their pep pills the moment their leaders come to power. There must be many people who took part in the Gujarat riots of 2002 that are now forming organisations like Religious Awakening. Unless Mr Modi puts his foot down and opens his heart wide, we're going to witness a dark period soon in the history of the country. But certain appointments and promotions made recently prove that Mr Modi is not going to put any of his organs in the right places.

      Delete
  2. IndraniAugust 9, 2014 at 8:50 AM

    I too am very worried on this account.
    I have lots of hope in Modi oovt. hope they don't ruin this country with petty issues like this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 9, 2014 at 9:52 AM

      Anyone in the right mind has ample reasons to worry, Indrani. Let's still hope.

      Delete
  3. IndraniAugust 9, 2014 at 8:50 AM

    *govt

    ReplyDelete
  4. ManiparnaAugust 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM

    i too had high hopes with Modi Government....thought that once he dons himself with sceptre and crown, he would come forth with a positive and impartial view...but I'm worried now....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 9, 2014 at 8:05 PM

      Mani, your phrase "sceptre and crown" conveys more than what an ordinary reader would understand. And that's exactly what I meant by using words like "ensconced" and "Indraprastha".

      Delete
  5. UnknownAugust 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM

    Wonderfully presented. Very compelling thoughts...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalAugust 9, 2014 at 8:05 PM

      Very glad to welcome you to this space, Siddharth.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher
19 comments
Read more

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse
8 comments
Read more

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa
9 comments
Read more

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts
7 comments
Read more

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived
16 comments
Read more