Skip to main content

To Kill a Mockingbird



“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another).” In fact, the Bible in the wrong hand can be diabolic. You can claim to own all the truths while drowning in a deluge of lies and forgeries. Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird teaches us that and many other great lessons of life.

“It is a sin to kill a mockingbird,” says the novel. Mockingbirds are innocent and harmless. Innocence should be preserved, not destroyed. Yet goodness is always under threat from evil in the human world. This is what the novel shows.

Tom Robinson is a black American in Maycomb. He is accused of raping Mayella, daughter of Bob Ewell who is nothing more than a drunkard with too many children. Actually Mayella asked Tom into the house under the pretext of helping with some repair. When she tried to seduce him, Bob Ewell entered and he beat up his daughter for what she did. He then accused Tom of molesting Mayella. Because Bob was white and Tom black and racism was rampant in America in those days.

Atticus, a white man, defends Tom and proves him innocent in the court. Yet the all-white court judges Tom guilty and rape is a capital offence in Alabama. Tom tries to run for his life but is shot to death. A mockingbird is killed.

There are other mockingbirds in the story which we witness through the eyes of the two children of Atticus. Even those children are mockingbirds who barely manage to escape death; Bob wanted to take revenge on Atticus by killing his children. Arthur (Boo) Radley is a reclusive character who lives in hiding in his own home throughout the novel though he makes his presence felt occasionally by hiding some gifts for the children of Atticus in a tree hole. He does come out once, towards the end of the novel, and that is to protect the children from Bob Ewell’s murderous attack. Boo puts an end to Bob. Goodness can win sometimes, maybe in mysterious ways.

The novel is too well-known for further elaboration. What makes the novel a classic is its fastidious refusal to succumb to cynicism in spite of the blatant victory of evil over good more than otherwise. Atticus knows he cannot win the case for the black Tom in racist Maycomb. In fact, the people of Maycomb turn against him though they all know that Tom is innocent. It is not a question of innocence for them. It is a matter of racial superiority. A black should not ever get any kind of ascendancy over the white even if the black is right and the white is wrong. Even if the black is obviously innocent and the white is appallingly guilty.

Whenever any people try to assert their cultural superiority or racial superiority or any similar superiority, people who do not belong to the culture or race or whatever become pathetic victims. Contemporary India is a good example to understand this. There is one particular community that is always anathematised no matter what the facts are or where the truths lie.

Nobody is perfect. People of any community have their own cultural and other drawbacks and peculiarities. That is no reason for making them scapegoats for whatever happens in the country. Every pandemic is not spread by them. Every drain is not clogged with their waste. Every crime is not their creation.

They may not be as innocent as mockingbirds. Mockingbirds “don’t eat up people’s gardens, don’t nest in corncribs. They don’t do one thing but sing their hearts out for us.” Tom Robinson was as good as a mockingbird.

All are not Tom Robinsons. But all are not Bob Ewells either. There are more Bobs than Toms in the world. There are more people subverting human values every moment of the day and the night than upholding them. That subversion becomes not only blatant but also acceptable when culture, religion and other such apparently sacrosanct entities confer their blessings upon it. Humanity should be liberated from these narrow constructs.

“As you grow older, you’ll see white men cheat black men every day of your life,” Atticus tells his children, “but let me tell you something and don’t you forget it… Whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash.”

To Kill a Mockingbird is a mirror for us to look into. Especially when our waters are roiled by the descendants of Bob Ewells. 


PS. This is part of a series being written for the #BlogchatterA2Z Challenge. The previous parts are:
14. No Exit
17. Quixote
18. The Rebel
Tomorrow: The Ugly Duckling

Comments

  1. This is amazing! This book has long been on my 'Wish-list'. To get a recommendation, and getting to know about it on the same day is simply superb. Noor has recommended this book in her post today and so good to get a glimpse of it here at your site. Thank you! I am so motivated to read it now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Life brings us interesting coincidences. Wish you a good time with the book.

      Delete
  2. I had bought this book about three years back on recommendation of one of my friend. I started it off well but somehow the book failed to hook me up. So it lay on my table for a while gathering dust. It was my son who during his holidays read it and forced me to finish reading it. Had it not been him, I would have deprived myself of reading a great classic with a message that is apt in today's world too!
    You have summed up the story so well Matheikal by adding the context of today's flavour.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually the book can put off a reader occasionally. I too found it a bit difficult to go on sometimes. Yet reading it remains a rewarding exercise.

      Delete
  3. Discrimination is an evil that we can never get rid of no matter how many laws we make. For how would exploitation be possible without it.
    Even when Im familiar with a book I keep coming back sir for the notes you add in the end. Your perspective is enriching.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for that appreciation. It feels good to hear such things.

      Delete
  4. Agree, there are more Bobs than Toms in the world and that everybody is not Bob. But in today's scenario, Bobs are being protected and portrayed as Toms. So, the question is- Who is the real 'Tom'? Will definitely get hold of this one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the situation today is more complex than in this novel where things were clearly black and white. Yet it's not very difficult to see through the miasma today too. What is lacking is a political will. Rather what is lacking is a political vision.

      Delete
  5. When you wrote, a mocking bird is killed, I had goosebumps. I was engrossed in the review. Gripping tale of innocence and evil deeds.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is one book I wanted to read. After going through your post I am tempted to add this to my TBR list.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This was one of those books that made me sit and ponder much after finishing. Atticus may have lost the trial but he had won in making his point. This tale reflects the blaring truth of the unjust world. It rings true even today, as you have pointed out. Mockingbirds suffer while the Bob Ewells walk free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good books always haunt us long after we have finished reading. What it means, among other things, is that you are a good reader.

      Delete
  8. For once our book recommendations coincide! Love this one.
    www.nooranandchawla.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. This book gives one to ponder upon much after it is over. It is such a favourite with everyone in the family. It is richly textured novel, woven from the strands of small-town life with characters one can relate to.Highly recommend to those who haven't read it.

    https://www.spoonsandsneakers.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A highly positive vision sustains it despite the evil that pervades it.

      Delete
  10. I have to read this book.
    Classic. Apt lessons.
    Feeling sorry for Tom.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have read this book... And that too twice... The first time I read I was too young to understand the book wholly and solely... So after a few years I had read it again... There are some books you can actually read multiple times and each time you read you understand new depths of the book... This is one such book! I loved the way you have reviewed it too... :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Classics demand many re-reads. Happy to know you liked this.

      Delete
  12. I picked this book a few years ago and couldnt go beyond a few pages. It has been lying abandoned on my book shelf since then. Have been meaning to read it... the hype/buzz around it is too much... hope to read it with patience this time. Thanks for the nudge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Welcome for the nudge. I hope you'll enjoy reading the book now.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

A Man Called Ove

Book Review   Title: A Man Called Ove Author: Fredrik Backman Translation from Swedish: Henning Koch Publisher: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, London, 2015 Pages: 295   Ove is a grumpy old man. Right in the initial pages of the novel, we are informed that “People said he was bitter. Maybe they were right. He’d never reflected much on it. People also called him ‘anti-social’. Ove assumed this meant he wasn’t overly keen on people. And in this instance he could totally agree with them. More often than not people were out of their minds.” The novel is Ove’s story It is Ove’s grumpiness that makes him a fascinating character for the reader. Grumpiness notwithstanding, Ove has a lot of goodness within. His world is governed by rules, order and routines. He is superhumanly hardworking and honest. He won’t speak about other people even if such silence means the loss of his job and even personal honour. When his colleague Tom steals money and puts the blame squarely...

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Writers and Morality

  Dostoevsky Dostoevsky was a compulsive gambler. He also consumed alcohol rather liberally. But he remains one of my favourite novelists of all time. Very few writers have produced novels that surpass the greatness of The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment . This raises a fundamental question: Should we keep a writer’s personal life totally aside while assessing the literary merit of their works? Going a little further with Dostoevsky, his personal vices gave him firsthand experience of despair, guilt, and redemption, which shaped the deep psychological and moral explorations in his novels. Raskolnikov and Ivan Karamazov were all parts of Dostoevksy’s complex personality. In other words, if Dostoevsky was an ideal human being, he wasn’t likely to have produced such great novels. It may also be recalled that most of his greatest works were written under extreme pressure from creditors who kept knocking at his door. If he were not the compulsive gambler that he was, t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...