Skip to main content

Paradigm Shift

 

Galileo facing the Roman Inquisition by Cristiano Banti, 1857. 

If we keep doing the same thing, we will keep getting the same result. Albert Einstein is credited with that saying. But Einstein’s genius is not required to say something as obvious as that. Yet, in spite of the backing of Einstein’s genius, we keep doing same things and keep getting same results. Our petty jealousies and violent spirituality, craze for power and race for wealth, idolisation of a Hitler or a Modi in the name of something as evasive as culture or race – nothing has changed over centuries.

We need a paradigm shift. Desperately so. We have messed up this world of ours terribly. We need to reshape our earth and our heavens. We need a paradigm shift.

One of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century, Thomas Kuhn, introduced the concept of paradigm shift. A paradigm, according to his definition, is a collective set of attitudes, values, procedures, techniques, etc that form the generally accepted perspective of a particular discipline at a point of time.

For example, the Ptolemaic system gave us a paradigm of the cosmos with the earth at its centre. That paradigm was very flattering for human beings because the sun, moon, stars, and planets all orbited the earth. The earth was a special planet, in other words. Religions, particularly the powerful Catholic Church, were mighty pleased with that paradigm. It fitted well with the Biblical paradigm of the earth being the chosen place of Yahweh and homo sapiens being the chosen race. [This chosen race narrowed soon to clutch only the Jews many of whom must have wished again and again to be liberated from God’s special fondness for them.]

In the first half of the 16th century, the Ptolemaic system gave way to the Copernican one and that was a revolutionary paradigm shift. The earth lost its most favoured status and became one tiny nugget of a planet in a gigantic cosmos which had many other heavenly bodies that were probably far more charming. This paradigm shift meant much to religions, particularly the powerful Catholic Church. The Church’s God could have lost His supremacy in the universe if all people accepted Copernicus instead of the Bible as a source of truth. Human beings would become insignificant creatures on a very minor planet in a gigantic system. Priests would lose job. That didn’t happen, however. The Church prohibited the Copernican theory and set in motion the bloodiest attack on truths. Inquisitions came into existence. Thinkers and truth-seekers were killed brutally.

Paradigm shifts are not easy affairs. Especially when gods come into play.

Genuine seekers of truth refuse to be deluded by gods. So we have had a lot of useful paradigm shifts along the way. Aristotelian mechanics gave way to classical mechanics in the 17th century. Later Newton gave way to Einstein. In psychology, cognitive approach superseded the behaviourist approach. In economics, Keynes turned an entire set of pet notions upside down.

Religion is one place where a paradigm shift was most wanted and that did not happen, alas. Our gods continued to demand blood and we killed fellow beings for them. We still do.

Religions claim to redeem souls from perdition but they are the most irredeemable entities. That’s a terrible irony. Jesus came to redeem his religion (and presumably all religions) from heartless rubrics and rituals. But his followers ended up establishing the most heartless religion with a whole range of absurd rubrics and rituals. The Buddha was a bold paradigm shifter before Jesus. He ended up as another blind squatting idol in the hands of his followers. More recently, Mahatma Gandhi tried to elevate the heart above everything else (like vindictive nationalism) and his country today stands diametrically opposed to all that he stood for and, irony of ironies, in the name of the very religion which Gandhi believed in.

We need a paradigm shift desperately today. It is obvious that religions can’t bring about that. Even gods failed when they tried to do it by coming amongst us in our own shapes and forms. But we need a shift from our self-centredness to a cosmic outlook. Who will bring about that shift? You.

PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z

Previous post in this series: Outliers

Tomorrow: Quest

Comments

  1. Recent events made me realize how we have learnt absolutely nothing from history and it is rather aggravating. We are the only ones who can save ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If a sizeable number of people realise that, the world will be saved.

      Delete
  2. You make a powerful plea for paradigm shift in your post today.

    Yuval Harrari, in his book Homo Deus, talks about dataism as the next big thing. I paraphrase his opinion of the current scenario about religion and the mess the world is in because of it: God is dead, but the dead body is taking time to be disposed off.

    As long as humans are enticed by power and greed, they will invent/use any ploy to seize that power. Religion and supremacist ideologies have been used thus far in human history to that end. We have seen how 'social media' has been used in case of Brexit etc. So, I wonder if we will just replace religion with another yardstick to keep a few in power (as we've always done)

    But, I'm an optimist so I believe in what Gandhi said: change begins from within. I reckon that is our only hope if we want to save ourselves.

    Thank you for writing such thought provoking and honest posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even if a 100 Hararis come and go, our systems will remain the same. Greed for wealth and power will continue to drive us.

      Thank you for being here with me.

      Delete
  3. We do need that shift. We have distorted all the learnings we got from spiritual leaders and philosophers of the past to suit our selfish needs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely need of the hour! People at the helm of the affairs have shifted to a base that is completely against us in all aspects. Seeing the recent turn of events, this shift is urgently required and only if people understand the gravity of the situation can something happen!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least the pandemic should accelerate the shift.

      Delete
  5. Absolutely. We desperately need a paradigm shift in our attitudes, values...
    The point you made about followers of different religions reminded me of a series, where a good man offers help to a black couple in need. Later he misinterprets the teachings in his holy book and unjustly persecutes the same couple. I feel he lost his way because in his heart he desired more to please his community rather than go by the spirit of his book (Series: THEM).
    Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the example. People often stick to rules and rubric without understanding the spirit.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...