Skip to main content

Tatvamasi

 


One of the most profound philosophies of life is Advaita Vedanta. The very word ‘advaita’ which literally means ‘not two’ summarises the entire philosophy succinctly. The Atman (self) and Brahman (God) are not two distinct entities; they are one and the same. Aham Brahmasmi, as the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad puts it: I am Brahman. The Chandogya Upanishad repeats the idea many times using the phrase ‘Tatvamasi’ which means ‘You are that’. You are God.

The distinction between Brahman and Atman, God and man, peters out as we move from the early Upansihads towards the later ones. As S Radhakrishnan (academic, professor, philosopher, and India’s second President) puts it in his scholarly introduction to the major Upanishads, “God is not merely the transcendent numinous other, but is also the universal spirit which is the basis of human personality and its ever-renewing vitalising power.”

God is not an entity lying somewhere in the outer space tinkering with the earth and its creatures or even with the cosmos itself. God is part of you, you are part of God. Better still, God is you and you are God. If you take a drop of water out of the ocean, the drop is not the ocean and yet it is in a way. Throw that drop back into the ocean and it becomes an undistinguishable part of the ocean. You and God are similar to that drop and the ocean. Tatvamasi.

What a great philosophy!

This philosophy endows us with divinity. We are divine, no less. This divinity bestows upon us certain responsibilities too. We should behave like gods. We should strive to live like gods. We should become God. It is we who make up the reality of Brahman. Our perfection is God’s perfection. And our imperfection too belongs to the same God. Tatvamasi.

Liberation or salvation lies in this knowledge, according to Advaita Vedanta. You don’t need to wait for death to attain moksha. Liberation can be achieved while living here on the earth by attaining that high level of consciousness which rises above the illusions of all dualities.

One of the biggest mistakes made by most human beings is to perceive God as a person with certain human characteristics at their best. Long ago Aristotle said that we create our gods in our own images. More than 23 centuries later, we still keep creating gods in our own images. We still keep building enormous temples (churches / mosques / whatever) for these gods whom we create.

Mahatma Gandhi refused to believe in man-made gods. “I have no knowledge that the Krishna of Mahabharata ever lived,” Gandhi wrote in Young India (Jan 1, 1925). “My Krishna has nothing to do with any historical person.” He went on to assert unambiguously, “I believe in Krishna of my imagination as a perfect incarnation, spotless in every sense of the word, the inspirer of the Gita.” Gandhi could not believe that the Krishna of the Mahabharata could actually be an incarnation of God because of the many immoral things perpetrated by him to win the war. Krishna of the Mahabharata was yet another creation of fertile human imagination.

Gandhi’s favourite god was Rama. Yet the Rama Gandhi worshipped was not the Rama of Ramayana. “My Rama,” said Gandhi, “the Rama of my prayers is not the historical Rama, the son of Dasharatha, the King of Ayodhya. He is the eternal, the unborn, the one without a second…” (Harijan: April 28, 1946)

Gandhi’s God was a metaphysical consciousness, perhaps the Brahman of Advaita. We can see the philosophy of Tatvamasi in complete practice in Gandhi’s life. In fact, most saints irrespective of their religions believed in that sacred oneness of all reality.

PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z

Yesterday’s post in the series: Spirituality

 

Comments

  1. Loved this post immensely! Yes what a great philosophy to imbibe and practice for a harmonious living.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ironically in the very birthplace of this profound philosophy, we find its opposite in full practice today.

      Delete
  2. Tattvamasi is such a beautiful concept
    From atoz https://poojapriyamvada.blogspot.com/2021/04/toska-newnormal-a2z.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for introducing such a wonderful concept.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's an age-old concept. I thought this would be dismissed as a cliché. Thanks for this.

      Delete
  4. Beautiful post, Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is indeed a profound post. The drop of ocean is still ocean, what a wonderful way to explain and such a beautiful concept. What you wrote about Gandhi and his belief about Rama and krishna i wasn't aware
    Deepika Sharma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now you know why the right wingers in India love to hate Gandhi.

      Delete
  6. Such an insightful post with interesting examples.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is indeed the most powerful and most divine concept.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Five simple words strung together in your post :"sacred oneness of all reality" is the only lesson Harari's 'reckless gods' need to learn to save themselves.
    Reading all your posts in quick succession, hence:)

    Thank you for reminding me of this powerful word.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You made me intoxicated with a series of comments today. Thank you.

      Delete
  9. "God is not an entity lying somewhere in the outer space tinkering with the earth and its creatures or even with the cosmos itself. God is part of you, you are part of God."
    What a grand explaination. A great post..

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very good post indeed. I respect your knowledge and your style of writing.
    Even though I may not fully agree with the viewpoints about Rama and Krishna,I wouldn't still undermine the greatness of this post.
    Once again thanks for a wonderful post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Accepting differences of views is a sign of greatness. Glad to have you as a friend here.

      Delete
  11. We should strive to live like Gods. My takeaway from the post, today.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Indian Knowledge Systems

Shashi Tharoor wrote a massive book back in 2018 to explore the paradoxes that constitute the man called Narendra Modi. Paradoxes dominate present Indian politics. One of them is what’s called the Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS). What constitute the paradox here are two parallel realities: one genuinely valuable, and the other deeply regressive. The contributions of Aryabhata and Brahmagupta to mathematics, Panini to linguistics, Vedanta to philosophy, and Ayurveda to medicine are genuine traditions that may deserve due attention. But there’s a hijacked version of IKS which is a hilariously, if not villainously, political project. Much of what is now packaged as IKS in government documents, school curricula, and propaganda includes mythological claims treated as historical facts, pseudoscience (e.g., Ravana’s Pushpaka Vimana as a real aircraft or Ganesha’s trunk as a product of plastic surgery), astrology replacing astronomy, ritualism replacing reasoning, attempts to invent the r...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Ghost with a Cat

It was about midnight when Kuriako stopped his car near the roadside eatery known as thattukada in Kerala. He still had another 27 kilometres to go, according to Google Map. Since Google Map had taken him to nowhere lands many a time, Kuriako didn’t commit himself much to that technology. He would rather rely on wayside shopkeepers. Moreover, he needed a cup of lemon tea. ‘How far is Anakkad from here?’ Kuriako asked the tea-vendor. Anakkad is where his friend Varghese lived. The two friends would be meeting after many years now. Both had taken voluntary retirement five years ago from their tedious and rather absurd clerical jobs in a government industry and hadn’t met each other ever since. Varghese abandoned all connection with human civilisation, which he viewed as savagery of the most brutal sort, and went to live in a forest with only the hill tribe people in the neighbourhood. The tribal folk didn’t bother him at all; they had their own occupations. Varghese bought a plot ...