Skip to main content

If Gandhi Returns

 

At Raj Ghat in 2001

About a decade back I suggested the theme ‘Gandhi Returns’ for a one-act play to a student. It was for an inter-House competition. Gulshan, the House Prefect, understood me instantly and wrote the script for the play that went on to win the first prize. In the play, Gandhi returned to the present India and was tormented by what he saw: corruption and political chicanery on the one hand and the helplessness of the common person on the other. Gandhi was another helpless common man on the side of the stage where life’s noisy drama was played out. Whenever he tried to interfere on behalf of truth and justice, he was rebuffed. Indians didn’t recognise him anymore. If someone did, it was worse: Gandhi was mocked or blamed.

Narendra Modi had not ascended the throne in Indraprastha yet. If he had, Gulshan’s script would have been different. Because for Gulshan, Modi became the real hero of India, the man who deserved to replace Gandhi as the father of the nation, after 2014. Probably Gulshan would have written a script in which Mahatma Gandhi retreated graciously and gracefully after placing his mantle on Modi’s back and congratulating him for being Sabka Saath and bringing Sabka Vikas.

Now, a decade after I suggested that theme to Gulshan, I sit in my home in a serene village in Kerala wondering about both the helpless Gandhi I imagined and the Gandhi I now imagine Gulshan would have portrayed a couple of years later. I think Gandhi wouldn’t have been either of these. He would refuse to be a helpless common man. He never was a helpless man. He was a fighter though one who fought differently from all others. He wouldn’t have stopped fighting even in the waning days of Dr Manmohan Sigh or in the heyday of Narendra Modi.

My suggestion to Gulshan was inspired by Dostoevsky who had imagined Jesus returning to the Catholic Spain only to be defenestrated by a Cardinal of the Church. Gandhi was different from Jesus, however; he wouldn’t have given up so easily. Jesus was driven more by love and kindness than by truth and justice. Gandhi was not so tender. I was wrong to suggest a feeble Gandhi to Gulshan. Gandhi would never give up without a fight even if it was Narendra Modi himself that he was pitted against.


Unfortunately Gandhi has no choice just as Jesus does not. Jesus is a prisoner of the churches established in his name and Gandhi’s mantle has been snatched by Modi. Modi is one of those rare figures in history to have paid obeisance to both Gandhi and Godse, the martyr and the killer. Modi is likely to be the only Indian who ever dared to replace the Mahatma in a classical picture. Only Modi can rush in where the greatest of spirits would dread to tread.


And today’s India belongs to that daring Modi. Today’s India is Modi’s creation. It took him just a few years to alter the entire fabric of a humongous nation. India today is just the obverse of what Gandhi had dreamt for the country. And it is the handiwork of Modi. I wouldn’t go to the extent of putting the words of one of Salman Rushdie’s characters verbatim into India’s mouth: “You took beauty and created hideousness.” But I would put what follows those words in Shalimar the Clown: “I am the meaning of your deeds. I am the meaning of your so-called love; your destructive, selfish, wanton love. Your love looks just like hatred… You turned me into a lie. This is not me. This is not me. This is you.”

I can visualise Gulshan gnashing his teeth if he reads this post. He thinks Gandhi deserves to be replaced with Modi. He is convinced that India deserves that if only for redeeming Hinduism from predators. And he is not an exception. He is just one among a few million Indians who think alike.

Ironically, Gandhi was the best Hindu who ever walked the earth.

Happy Gandhi Jayanti.

PS. This blog is participating in The Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa campaign.

Comments

  1. I read your post and can make out that we live in democratic India and every being has right to their words!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps India is too large for any individual to take away her democracy!

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Well spoken!!! Modi is no mahatma, no matter how he dresses or lengthens his beard. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But one might appreciate his efforts to create a niche for himself in history.

      Delete
  3. Such a wonderful way to put up the thoughts.....appreciating as the world wants to read while indicating your pov....

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought I would read about how Ghandhi ji felt coming back in 2021. But the post is more inclined towards political aspect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've written pretty much about Gandhi. So i wanted this post to be different. Can we strip politics off while speaking of Gandhi's return?

      Delete
  5. From where I see he is the best marketing person in the world. For a good or bad, that history will tell. It's more like love him hate him but don't ignore him

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Certainly he can't be ignored. About history's verdict, i can say that history has never been benign to those who were little more than showbiz marketers.

      Delete
  6. As i began reading your post i was thinking Gandhi would never be a common man and you pointed that out soon. Even though i do not agree with everything about Modi yet your points about Gandhi were spot on

    ReplyDelete
  7. Manisha - I don't know the exact thoughts if Gandhi returned but I feel he would be happy to see that people still stand up together some on his principles some not but raise their concerns. As for Modi, good or bad is something I dont know but you cant ignore him for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Am no Modi Bhakt or anti him. He is no Mahatma for sure. But he has surely created a mark for himself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As a Gandhian and Protestant Christian the following lines shocked me:
    --
    Unfortunately Gandhi has no choice just as Jesus does not. Jesus is a prisoner of the churches established in his name and Gandhi’s mantle has been snatched by Modi.
    --
    I read your blog thrice to understand your perspective, in retrospect, I am able to see your point of view.
    Loved your thought-provoking post! Keep sharing your thoughts, you have a fan in me!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Definitely a thought provoking post. But need more understanding of Gandhi. I am speaking about myself. I have not read Gandhi much. But yes, I appreciate what Modi is doing. Both have kept country at the centre and both have their weakness and strengths and none is God.
    I was just checking the reality of Modi garlanding Godse and it's false. You can check it here https://www.thequint.com/news/webqoof/pm-modi-didnt-garland-nathuram-godses-bust-it-was-deen-dayal-upadhyay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes we are quickly taken by what is being shared on social media. Liked you have the picture is not true. So, I feel we pick the information very very carefully.
      Politically we have to wait more to know about Modi

      Delete
  11. How I wish that he does return, we need him more now than ever.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I expected something different view on Gandhi....but agree with the view about present "Mahatma".

    ReplyDelete
  13. Democracy has given rights to each person who is a Gandhi or Godse from the inside

    ReplyDelete
  14. wow - interesting and thought provoking post....

    ReplyDelete
  15. What a thought provoking read this was. Men like Gandhi cannot be replaced ever.

    ReplyDelete
  16. He will definitely be in for a shocker if he returns. A thought provoking post.

    ReplyDelete
  17. He will definitely be in for a shocker if he returns. A thought provoking post.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is definitely thought provoking for me. I try to imagine what if Gandhi visited India in year 2021. There are endless thoughts in my mind right now. I just want to say I don't think that Modi and Gandhi are the figures one could compare.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wll, your post has left me in an on going confusion. All the what of's are scarry.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...