Skip to main content

The Enemies of Religion

 


The enemies of religion are not non-believers; on the contrary, it is the believers themselves.

Any social organisation or institution is destined to degenerate and even perish eventually when its foundations shift towards hatred of certain people. Religions are social institutions. When their leaders begin to preach hatred, they are sowing the seeds of degeneration within their own institutions. Initially it may appear that they are gaining power over people of other religions by making them appear as enemies. In the long run, however, hatred won’t achieve anything good.

If you are observing what is happening in the social media these days, it must have become clear to you by now that certain believers of every major religion in India (in many other countries too) are spewing poison against believers of other religions. Hindus, Muslims and Christians – all are doing it. These people are the real enemies of their own respective religions. They are killing the very spirit of their own religions. Neither Rama and Krishna nor the Prophet and Jesus will ever approve of what many of their worshippers are doing in their names these days. 

The Catholic Church provides us with a historical example. It became a monstrous religion in the medieval period in Europe killing all perceived enemies more brutally than any diabolic dictator ever did in history. The Church appeared to be victorious for quite some time. But the inevitable collapse happened. A movement that came to be known as Enlightenment swept the Church away like malingering filth. Science and scientific temper flourished in Europe. Today the churches in the West are quite empty.

The present Pope has been relentlessly seeking ways to make the Church meaningful to today’s people living in a world that is poisoned with hatred, particularly hatred spread by religious people. Many ‘believers’ don’t like him for this. He said recently during his Slovakia visit that there are people who desire his death. He appeared to make the remark rather frivolously. But he was not being frivolous. It is Christians themselves who want the Pope dead – ultra-conservative Christians who don’t like the Pope’s progressive views. It is such believers who are the real enemies of their own religion.

These conservatives don’t like the Pope for teaching things like: Christianity is not the only true religion, “It’s better to be an atheist than a hypocritical Catholic,” “God is not a Catholic,” “The poor are the real body of Christ,” and so on. He opposes religious conversions. His God loves homosexuals and LGBTs. In short, he is an enlightened human being. And religions have seldom accepted enlightened teachers.

Religions love hate-mongers. Look at the popular leaders in India today, for example. Listen to their utterances whether they call themselves yogis or swamis or Pracharaks. Or bishops or cardinals. Or maulvis or mullahs.  

The really religious people are helpless in today’s India. Some of them perish in prisons like Stan Swamy. Even his Church did not lift a finger to save him. And you know why. If you don’t, you need to check the meaning of your religion for you.

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    True, every word... so very sad, but very true... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. There'sn't a single word in this article which I can disapprove or disagree to. The really religious people are indeed helpless in today’s India. That's only make me wonder whether the human-beings really need religions at all. This article of yours only make me recall that even the Church didn't do anything to save the life of Father Stan Swamy. Those controlling the strings of power in India have converted the countrymen into two kinds of crowds - 1. The crowd of Bhakts, 2. The crowd of cowards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. American philosopher Barrows Dunham wrote in his book 'Man against myth' that "truth has been suffered to exist in the world just to the extent that it profited the rulers of society." We see how true this is in today's India - particularly the way history is being rewritten to suit the new regime. Religion is just a handmaid of the rulers now as it always was. So your question is very valid: is religion needed at all? But for people like you and me only the question arises. For the others, what religion is doing is the right thing: be a handmaid to political power.

      The Church in India today is a very corrupt institution. There are too many crimes that it has to hide. It requires the support of the political system for that. That's why it won't ever go against the political system. It has to bend down, way too down!


      Delete
  3. Agree with you. Religion is supposed to spread love not hate. Sadly, religion has been used as a medium to propagate hatred through the ages. Its nature (blind faith) itself makes it easy to use.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was a time when I used to wonder why people are so foolish. Now I know it's no use asking such questions. I've learnt to accept the stupidity and venality of human nature. I write for self-consolation.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Subhuman Social Media

Illustration by Copilot Designer I disabled Facebook on my phone yesterday. There’s too much vulgarity, subhuman crudity, on it. And the first thing I read this morning was a Malayalam weekly – Samakalika Malayalam from the Indian Express group – whose editorial lamented the treatment meted out on social media to Dr M Leelavathi, renowned Malayalam writer. Leelavathi refused to celebrate her 98 th birthday because she said she was distressed by the pictures of innocent children dying of human-made hunger in Gaza. She was trolled by the Hindu right wing in Kerala for saying that. The editorial mentioned above requests the “Hindutva handles” to leave alone Leelavathi. If Kerala’s beloved poet and educationist was moved to tears by the sight of little children behaving like insane creatures as soon as they espy some food, it only reveals the deep humanity that sustained her poetry as well as her world vision. The editorial went on to mention that 20,000 children were killed by Is...

Death of Humour and Rise of Sycophancy in India

Front pages of Newspapers in Delhi on Modi's birthday Yesterday the newspapers in Delhi (and many other places too) carried full page photo of Narendra Modi to celebrate his 75 th birthday. It was sycophancy at its zenith in the history of India’s print media. At no other point in the country’s history had the newspaper industry stooped so low. The first Prime Minister of the country was a man who encouraged the media to be critical of him. Nehru appreciated cartoons that caricatured him mercilessly. Criticism, particularly in the press, helped Nehru keep his ego under check. Shankar’s Weekly was the best cartoon magazine of those times. Launched in 1948 by K Shankar Pillai, the weekly featured political cartoons, satire and humorous articles. It criticised politicians mercilessly by caricaturing or satirising them. Nehru was a prime target. And the PM wasn’t upset. On the contrary, he appreciated Shankar Pillai’s efforts to make the nation, particularly its political leade...

A Man Called Ove

Book Review   Title: A Man Called Ove Author: Fredrik Backman Translation from Swedish: Henning Koch Publisher: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, London, 2015 Pages: 295   Ove is a grumpy old man. Right in the initial pages of the novel, we are informed that “People said he was bitter. Maybe they were right. He’d never reflected much on it. People also called him ‘anti-social’. Ove assumed this meant he wasn’t overly keen on people. And in this instance he could totally agree with them. More often than not people were out of their minds.” The novel is Ove’s story It is Ove’s grumpiness that makes him a fascinating character for the reader. Grumpiness notwithstanding, Ove has a lot of goodness within. His world is governed by rules, order and routines. He is superhumanly hardworking and honest. He won’t speak about other people even if such silence means the loss of his job and even personal honour. When his colleague Tom steals money and puts the blame squarely...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...