Skip to main content

Bhakti in Gita


The ultimate purpose of the Bhagavad Gita is to teach egolessness to humans. There are three ways of achieving the state of egolessness, according to the Gita. The first is Karma Yoga, which was discussed in the previous post. Today we are going to look at the second way, Bhakti Yoga, the yoga of devotion.

Chapter 12 of the Gita discusses bhakti in particular though chapters 7 to 12 are more or less about bhakti and I’m going to look at that section today.

Bhakti or devotion is another name for love. Bhakti yoga is the process of discovering the divine through love. The love is so intense that the devotee surrenders himself totally to the divine. As a result, the devotee begins to see the divine in everything, in every creature. All that exists is now holy for the devotee. No real devotee can distinguish between people on the basis of caste, creed, language, etc. There is no place for such divisions since everything, everyone, is an extension of the divine.

The Gita speaks about different types of devotion. Not everyone will be capable of the absolute renunciation which is the ideal. Lesser devotees also can attain the divine through prayer and meditation, doing everything with the divine in mind (by performing all actions and functions for Me – 12.10), by being good to others (non-envious, merciful to others, free from egoism, forgiving – 12.13)…

As I was reading chapter 12 of the Gita, it struck me that the teachings are no different from what most other religions are saying. Why can’t then all these religions come together and agree on their core values and principles so that there will be peace and harmony in the world?  

The similarities are not confined to chapter 12. The god of this entire section – chapters 7 to 12 – of the Gita is quite similar to the god of the semitic religions too. This God who demands egoless devotion from the faithful is an entity full of ego and conceit, no different from Yahweh of Judaism and Christianity or Allah of Islam. How different is the God of the Gita who says “I am the beginning, and the middle, and the also the end of all beings” [10.20] from the Biblical God who says “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End” (Revelations 22.13)? The same kind of bombastic claims made by the semitic god are also made by the god of the Gita. Sample this: Of the Adityas, I am Vishnu; of the luminaries, the dazzling sun; I am Marichi of the Maruts; of the stars I am the Moon… Of the senses I am the mind and I am the consciousness in beings. Of the rudras I am Shankara and Kubera of the yakshas and the rakshas; of the Vasus I am the Fire and I am Meru among mountain-peaks…” That goes on and on. Not quite a humble God, right? No different from the Semitic God, that’s right too.

And the devotee is supposed to be egoless as well as aspiring to merge into the Great Ego!

Well, I know that logic has no place in bhakti. But that is one of my chief concerns about building theocracies like Ram Rajya. In today’s Telegraph newspaper, some scientists raise this same concern. In the name of culture, India is promoting pseudoscience in the country, particularly in its schools. The Gita is proposed to be taught in the schools of the country as a guide for ethical and spiritual behaviour. Thank my stars, I chose to stop teaching. Otherwise my ego would clash with that of Gita’s God in the classroom.

Interestingly, this section of the Gita which demands egoless devotion from devotees shows the mightiest ego of God in the form of his cosmic manifestation: Vishwarupam. That cosmic form is a mirror image of the biblical god of the final judgment.

Maybe, instead of teaching the Gita in schools, the students can be asked to make a comparative study of the relevant scriptures of all the major religions in the country. The students should also be encouraged to examine these scriptures critically in the light of the knowledge available to us today. Let the students devote themselves to learning, to widening the horizon of their thinking, their imagination, their hearts too.

The third and last part of the Gita [chapters 13-18] discusses knowledge. I’ll come to that tomorrow.

I repeat what I mentioned in this space yesterday: these are my personal reflections and opinions. As long as thinking is still free (not chained yet) in this country, I hope I can let my mind go beyond the horizons of sacred scriptures with total bhakti to pursuit of truth. 


 

 

Top post on Blogchatter

Comments

  1. "Why can’t then all these religions come together and agree on their core values and principles so that there will be peace and harmony in the world?" I think the answer to this is that religions are not about their core teachings. Rather, they are a way for men to gain power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Today religion is one of biggest divisive forces present in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Half the things that Gita says are so misrepresented these days, ideally one should read it for themselves and understand

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...