Skip to main content

Bhakti in Gita


The ultimate purpose of the Bhagavad Gita is to teach egolessness to humans. There are three ways of achieving the state of egolessness, according to the Gita. The first is Karma Yoga, which was discussed in the previous post. Today we are going to look at the second way, Bhakti Yoga, the yoga of devotion.

Chapter 12 of the Gita discusses bhakti in particular though chapters 7 to 12 are more or less about bhakti and I’m going to look at that section today.

Bhakti or devotion is another name for love. Bhakti yoga is the process of discovering the divine through love. The love is so intense that the devotee surrenders himself totally to the divine. As a result, the devotee begins to see the divine in everything, in every creature. All that exists is now holy for the devotee. No real devotee can distinguish between people on the basis of caste, creed, language, etc. There is no place for such divisions since everything, everyone, is an extension of the divine.

The Gita speaks about different types of devotion. Not everyone will be capable of the absolute renunciation which is the ideal. Lesser devotees also can attain the divine through prayer and meditation, doing everything with the divine in mind (by performing all actions and functions for Me – 12.10), by being good to others (non-envious, merciful to others, free from egoism, forgiving – 12.13)…

As I was reading chapter 12 of the Gita, it struck me that the teachings are no different from what most other religions are saying. Why can’t then all these religions come together and agree on their core values and principles so that there will be peace and harmony in the world?  

The similarities are not confined to chapter 12. The god of this entire section – chapters 7 to 12 – of the Gita is quite similar to the god of the semitic religions too. This God who demands egoless devotion from the faithful is an entity full of ego and conceit, no different from Yahweh of Judaism and Christianity or Allah of Islam. How different is the God of the Gita who says “I am the beginning, and the middle, and the also the end of all beings” [10.20] from the Biblical God who says “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End” (Revelations 22.13)? The same kind of bombastic claims made by the semitic god are also made by the god of the Gita. Sample this: Of the Adityas, I am Vishnu; of the luminaries, the dazzling sun; I am Marichi of the Maruts; of the stars I am the Moon… Of the senses I am the mind and I am the consciousness in beings. Of the rudras I am Shankara and Kubera of the yakshas and the rakshas; of the Vasus I am the Fire and I am Meru among mountain-peaks…” That goes on and on. Not quite a humble God, right? No different from the Semitic God, that’s right too.

And the devotee is supposed to be egoless as well as aspiring to merge into the Great Ego!

Well, I know that logic has no place in bhakti. But that is one of my chief concerns about building theocracies like Ram Rajya. In today’s Telegraph newspaper, some scientists raise this same concern. In the name of culture, India is promoting pseudoscience in the country, particularly in its schools. The Gita is proposed to be taught in the schools of the country as a guide for ethical and spiritual behaviour. Thank my stars, I chose to stop teaching. Otherwise my ego would clash with that of Gita’s God in the classroom.

Interestingly, this section of the Gita which demands egoless devotion from devotees shows the mightiest ego of God in the form of his cosmic manifestation: Vishwarupam. That cosmic form is a mirror image of the biblical god of the final judgment.

Maybe, instead of teaching the Gita in schools, the students can be asked to make a comparative study of the relevant scriptures of all the major religions in the country. The students should also be encouraged to examine these scriptures critically in the light of the knowledge available to us today. Let the students devote themselves to learning, to widening the horizon of their thinking, their imagination, their hearts too.

The third and last part of the Gita [chapters 13-18] discusses knowledge. I’ll come to that tomorrow.

I repeat what I mentioned in this space yesterday: these are my personal reflections and opinions. As long as thinking is still free (not chained yet) in this country, I hope I can let my mind go beyond the horizons of sacred scriptures with total bhakti to pursuit of truth. 


 

 

Top post on Blogchatter

Comments

  1. "Why can’t then all these religions come together and agree on their core values and principles so that there will be peace and harmony in the world?" I think the answer to this is that religions are not about their core teachings. Rather, they are a way for men to gain power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Today religion is one of biggest divisive forces present in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Half the things that Gita says are so misrepresented these days, ideally one should read it for themselves and understand

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...