Book Review
Title: Amrita & Victor
Author: Ashwini Bhatnagar
Publisher: Fingerprint, New
Delhi, 2023
Pages: 216
Artists see reality differently. The colours and contours
of objects catch their attention first. Most of us who are not so artistic perceive
objects conceptually. Non-artists turn images into concepts, in other words.
Colours and contours have much to do with emotions and passions. No wonder
Irving Stone’s biographical novel on Vincent Van Gogh is titled Lust for
Life. Art is a kind of lust, or result of lust.
Amrita & Victor is the biography of a
very gifted painter who died at the young age of 28 years, having achieved
considerable fame. Her full name was Amrita Dalma Antonia Sher-Gil. Her mother
Marie Antoinette was from Hungary and she got the child baptised as a
Christian. The father, Umrao Sher-Gil, was a Sikh from India who didn’t care
much for religion.
Amrita got professional training in
art right from her childhood. Everyone who came into contact with her and had
some idea about art and painting realised how talented the child was. Florence
and then Paris cultivated the artist in the young girl.
Amrita had very strong personal notions about art and hence she didn’t blindly follow any particular school. She developed her own style which was recognised as great by many artists and art critics. Even Jawaharlal Nehru took note of her and visited her art exhibition. Nehru maintained steady communication with her so much so that her mother thought of arranging her marriage with Nehru. Kamala had died of tuberculosis and Nehru was a charming man with a little daughter to take care of. His acute sense of perception and sharp intellect had drawn Amrita’s attention too.
Amrita |
It is not the age gap of 24 years
that prompted Amrita to say an emphatic ‘no’ to her mother’s proposal. Amrita
was in love with Victor, her first cousin, who was studying medicine in
Hungary. Amrita’s father was worried about a marriage between first cousins.
Her mother was concerned about Victor’s intellectual mediocrity and apparent
laziness. Amrita was stubborn, however. She had a very domineering personality
as most artists seem to have.
It takes many years for Victor and
Amrita to unite in marriage. In the meanwhile, both of them have their own
affairs. Amrita sleeps with countless men and one woman too. Sex is a way for
her to subdue the passions that boil in her veins. Sex is a kind of emotional
release, letting out steam. If there is no man available, she will masturbate.
One day while she is masturbating, a stranger sees her through the window of
her room and asks whether he could join her. Her answer is an immediate and eager
‘yes’.
She speaks openly to Victor about her
passionate relationships with men. Victor is able to understand and accept all
those eccentricities. Even some eminent personalities like Malcolm Muggeridge
were enamoured of her. Muggeridge was working as an assistant editor with The
Statesman of Calcutta at that time. His duty was in Simla where he met
Amrita. It was a kind of love at first sight. Amrita had this ability to make
men turn their faces. The affair didn’t last, however. “The best thing about
her is her gaiety and sincerity,” Muggeridge wrote in his diary. “She’s a demon…
I love her. This is the truth.” But the demon in Amrita was seldom serious when
it came to relationships.
Muggeridge soon saw “something
squalid in her” and “a sort of genius that I love.” Soon he realised how “utterly
egocentric, coarse, and petulantly spoilt” the young Amrita was.
Amrita’s egotism came from her clear
perceptions of reality. Her observations were penetrating. Her remarks about
people were caustic because they were too true. She was never ready to tell
half-truths for the sake of making reality look pleasant.
Once she ran away from her home in
the middle of the night just because her sister made certain (biased)
allegations against her. And she climbed up a mountain, walking through the
forest in the middle of the night, not caring for the wild animals that roamed
there in the woods, to reach the house of a friend ten miles away. When she was
questioned what if some criminal had raped her on the way, her answer was: “It
would have been an experience!”
Life was a buoyant experience for
Amrita. Life was a kind of lust for her. Art and sex, both, played a big role
in it. Even her eventual marriage with Victor, against the wishes of her
parents, didn’t help her to refine the intensity of her physical lust. That
lust led to tragedy. She died at the age of 28. She had already become a
celebrated artist in the country and even abroad. She could have achieved a lot
more. But being an authentic artist is never easy.
This biography is well-written and keeps
us engrossed. I would have certainly loved it all the more had the author taken
a little more trouble to analyse the intricacies of the artist’s mind in
greater depth.
I wonder about her art. I don't think I would have liked the woman.
ReplyDeleteI'm no good at judging art. So let me not say anything about that. What fascinates me is the outlandishness of this lady's character.
DeleteEvery person is different, mostly shaped by both nature (genes) and nurture (surroundings and upbringing). Yes, it would insightful to know more about what makes such persons who they are.
ReplyDeleteThat's what draws me to biographies. To know what the individual is. To console myself in the process 😊
DeleteArtists often love madness. They thrive in it. They see through it. They understand madness. The world is more colourful to them. The insane the artist, the better their art. If it wasn't for proof, i could say, romanticising every evil is the fundamental for their ideas.
ReplyDeleteWithout some insanity, there's no art. I do agree.
Delete