Skip to main content

Art and Lust

Book Review

Title: Amrita & Victor

Author: Ashwini Bhatnagar

Publisher: Fingerprint, New Delhi, 2023

Pages: 216

Artists see reality differently. The colours and contours of objects catch their attention first. Most of us who are not so artistic perceive objects conceptually. Non-artists turn images into concepts, in other words. Colours and contours have much to do with emotions and passions. No wonder Irving Stone’s biographical novel on Vincent Van Gogh is titled Lust for Life. Art is a kind of lust, or result of lust.

Amrita & Victor is the biography of a very gifted painter who died at the young age of 28 years, having achieved considerable fame. Her full name was Amrita Dalma Antonia Sher-Gil. Her mother Marie Antoinette was from Hungary and she got the child baptised as a Christian. The father, Umrao Sher-Gil, was a Sikh from India who didn’t care much for religion.

Amrita got professional training in art right from her childhood. Everyone who came into contact with her and had some idea about art and painting realised how talented the child was. Florence and then Paris cultivated the artist in the young girl.

Amrita had very strong personal notions about art and hence she didn’t blindly follow any particular school. She developed her own style which was recognised as great by many artists and art critics. Even Jawaharlal Nehru took note of her and visited her art exhibition. Nehru maintained steady communication with her so much so that her mother thought of arranging her marriage with Nehru. Kamala had died of tuberculosis and Nehru was a charming man with a little daughter to take care of. His acute sense of perception and sharp intellect had drawn Amrita’s attention too. 

Amrita

It is not the age gap of 24 years that prompted Amrita to say an emphatic ‘no’ to her mother’s proposal. Amrita was in love with Victor, her first cousin, who was studying medicine in Hungary. Amrita’s father was worried about a marriage between first cousins. Her mother was concerned about Victor’s intellectual mediocrity and apparent laziness. Amrita was stubborn, however. She had a very domineering personality as most artists seem to have.

It takes many years for Victor and Amrita to unite in marriage. In the meanwhile, both of them have their own affairs. Amrita sleeps with countless men and one woman too. Sex is a way for her to subdue the passions that boil in her veins. Sex is a kind of emotional release, letting out steam. If there is no man available, she will masturbate. One day while she is masturbating, a stranger sees her through the window of her room and asks whether he could join her. Her answer is an immediate and eager ‘yes’.

She speaks openly to Victor about her passionate relationships with men. Victor is able to understand and accept all those eccentricities. Even some eminent personalities like Malcolm Muggeridge were enamoured of her. Muggeridge was working as an assistant editor with The Statesman of Calcutta at that time. His duty was in Simla where he met Amrita. It was a kind of love at first sight. Amrita had this ability to make men turn their faces. The affair didn’t last, however. “The best thing about her is her gaiety and sincerity,” Muggeridge wrote in his diary. “She’s a demon… I love her. This is the truth.” But the demon in Amrita was seldom serious when it came to relationships.

Muggeridge soon saw “something squalid in her” and “a sort of genius that I love.” Soon he realised how “utterly egocentric, coarse, and petulantly spoilt” the young Amrita was.

Amrita’s egotism came from her clear perceptions of reality. Her observations were penetrating. Her remarks about people were caustic because they were too true. She was never ready to tell half-truths for the sake of making reality look pleasant.

Once she ran away from her home in the middle of the night just because her sister made certain (biased) allegations against her. And she climbed up a mountain, walking through the forest in the middle of the night, not caring for the wild animals that roamed there in the woods, to reach the house of a friend ten miles away. When she was questioned what if some criminal had raped her on the way, her answer was: “It would have been an experience!”

Life was a buoyant experience for Amrita. Life was a kind of lust for her. Art and sex, both, played a big role in it. Even her eventual marriage with Victor, against the wishes of her parents, didn’t help her to refine the intensity of her physical lust. That lust led to tragedy. She died at the age of 28. She had already become a celebrated artist in the country and even abroad. She could have achieved a lot more. But being an authentic artist is never easy.

This biography is well-written and keeps us engrossed. I would have certainly loved it all the more had the author taken a little more trouble to analyse the intricacies of the artist’s mind in greater depth.

Comments

  1. I wonder about her art. I don't think I would have liked the woman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm no good at judging art. So let me not say anything about that. What fascinates me is the outlandishness of this lady's character.

      Delete
  2. Every person is different, mostly shaped by both nature (genes) and nurture (surroundings and upbringing). Yes, it would insightful to know more about what makes such persons who they are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what draws me to biographies. To know what the individual is. To console myself in the process 😊

      Delete
  3. Artists often love madness. They thrive in it. They see through it. They understand madness. The world is more colourful to them. The insane the artist, the better their art. If it wasn't for proof, i could say, romanticising every evil is the fundamental for their ideas.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...