Skip to main content

A Lesson from Little Prince



I joined the #WriteAPageADay challenge of Blogchatter, as I mentioned earlier in another post. I haven’t succeeded in writing a page every day, though. But as long as you manage to write a minimum of 10,000 words in the month of Feb, Blogchatter is contented. I woke up this morning feeling rather vacant in the head, which happens sometimes. Whenever that happens to me but I do want to get on with what I should, I fall back on a book that has inspired me. One such book is Antoine de Saint-Exupery’s The Little Prince.

I have wished time and again to meet Little Prince in person as the narrator of his story did. We might have interesting conversations like the ones that exist in the novel.

If a sheep eats shrubs, will he also eat flowers? That is one of the questions raised by Little Prince [LP]. “A sheep eats whatever he meets,” the narrator answers. “Even flowers that have thorns?” LP is interested in the rose he has on his tiny planet. When he is told that the sheep will eat flowers that have thorns too, his question is: “Then the thorns, what are they for?” The narrator who is busy repairing his damaged airplane answers in annoyance: “Thorns are useless, it’s pure wickedness on the part of flowers!”

LP is not amused. He reflects for a moment and says, “I do not believe you! Flowers are weak. They are naïve. They reassure themselves as best as they can. They think they are terrible with their thorns…”

The book is full of such conversations with profound meanings. That’s why I can always fall back on it when I need inspiration.

The rose is one of the many symbols in the book. It symbolises love, uniqueness, and responsibility. It teaches LP that love requires effort and understanding. His rose, which he initially thinks of as vain and difficult, turns out to be tender at heart. Her words and actions stem from vulnerability as well as affection. Love isn’t always perfect; it requires patience and deep understanding. And it can hurt too.

When LP discovers a garden full of roses, he feels disappointed at first, believing his rose is not unique after all. However, the fox (another character in the novel) teaches him that “It is the time you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important.”

I have highlighted that quote just because it is one of my favourites. I have quoted it year after year in my classrooms. Your rose is special for you because of the time and care you give to it. Things or people we cherish gain importance through our attention, effort, and sacrifices. LP’s rose is unique for him merely because of the bond they share. Your emotional connection with someone acquires depth through shared experiences and personal involvement.

Meaning isn’t inherent in objects or people. The rose doesn’t have any meaning in itself. The rose acquires a deep meaning for LP because he has invested time, emotion, and effort in the flower. The rose becomes irreplaceable for LP because of the love and care he has given it.

One of the characters in the novel, as mentioned above, is a fox. The fox wants LP to tame it.

“What does that mean – ‘tame’?” LP asks.

“It means to establish ties,” Fox explains. “To me, you are still nothing more than a little boy who is just like a hundred thousand other little boys. And I have no need of you. And you, on your part, have no need of me. To you, I am nothing more than a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes. But if you tame me, then we shall need each other. To me, you will be unique in all the world. To you, I shall be unique in all the world…”

Fox goes on quite poetically: “If you tame me, my life will be filled with sunshine. I shall know the sound of footsteps that will be different from all the rest. Other footsteps send me hurrying underground. Yours will call me out of my burrow, like music.”

Words are redundant in the taming process, Fox says. “Words are the source of misunderstandings.” You just have to sit down at a little distance from me in the grass. I shall watch you out of the corner of my eye, and you will say nothing. Over time, we will get closer to each other. That is taming.

My pet cat, Plato, is watching me out of the corner of his eye pretending to be asleep, lying on my printer that is next to the laptop on which I’m typing out this. There’s no distance between him and me because we have already ‘tamed’ each other. He’s just waiting for me to finish this job so that he can demand more attention from me. The time that I have ‘wasted’ for Plato is what makes him important for me. 


PS. You can download a free version of The Little Prince here.

Top post on Blogchatter

Comments

  1. Amazing and deeply insightful! Through the little boy’s perspective and conversations, we gain a deeper understanding of the world and learn to live with greater purpose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So nice to see your comment, first time if I'm not mistaken.

      Delete
  2. I've never read this book. It sounds like you got a lot out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Incredible Sir. A little boys thought are amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That book is a classic which can be enjoyed by everyone irrespective of age.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...