Skip to main content

Mani, the Maverick



Book Review

Title: A Maverick in Politics

Author: Mani Shankar Aiyar

Publisher: Juggernaut, New Delhi, 2024

Pages: 410

A politician’s memoirs will be intertwined with the history of his country. Mani Shankar Aiyar’s book is no exception. This is the second part of the author’s memoirs and it deals with the years from 1991 to 2024. The very opening sentence reassures you that this is a continuation from the last book: “I returned to Delhi elated and triumphant to find two sets of invitations to dinner from the two rival contestants for the leadership of the Congress party.”

The first few chapters describe what Aiyar did as an MP both in his constituency and in the parliament as well as wherever he was given responsibilities. His proximity to Rajiv Gandhi had given him an edge over many other Congressmen, and Sonia Gandhi gave him many important duties especially attending meetings and other programmes abroad. After all, Aiyar was in the Indian Foreign Service before quitting that to join politics. So sending him to participate in programmes abroad was a natural choice.

The middle portion of the book tells us about the various ministries which Aiyar handled successfully (his claim). He held some important portfolios like Petroleum and Natural Gas, Youth Affairs and Sports, and the Northeast. His narrative gives us a vivid picture of how politics function in India.

The last two chapters are, perhaps, the most interesting with Aiyar’s musings and reflections articulated with his characteristic humour and incisiveness.

What makes the book fascinating is its anecdotal approach. For example, the one single instance of his conflict with Jayalalithaa, then chief minister of Tamil Nadu. Aiyar joined a public meeting held in Nagapattinam, the district in which his constituency lay. Since the meeting was about developmental projects, Aiyar wanted to highlight his projects for his constituency. However, after his speech, Jayalalithaa rose and attacked him viciously calling him a “rotter.” Aiyar got up from his seat, went to Jayalalithaa at her lectern and told her that she was just a “cheapskate.” What had provoked Jayalalithaa’s ire was a recent article of Aiyar which began thus: “When Jayalalithaa became the chief minister of Tamil Nadu, she presented a baby elephant to the Guruvayur temple. When I become CM of TN, I will present Jayalalithaa to the Guruvayur temple.” Jayalalithaa’s elephantine physique and even larger ego couldn’t digest Aiyar’s bizarre humour.

Aiyar is honest through and through in the book. He accepts that he can be bizarre occasionally. Be that as it may, the anecdotes he provides in the book throws ample light into the character of the people concerned including Aiyar. What enchants us is the forthrightness of Aiyar’s narrative.

Jayalalithaa was not one to take insults lying down. After calling her a cheapskate, Aiyar left the stage. Soon he was chased by Jayalalithaa’s goons and he barely managed to escape because of a good friend’s timely intervention.

We get to see the real faces, the faces behind the masks, of many politicians in this book. Not only politicians. Business honchos too. When Aiyar became the minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas, he was welcomed on his very first day in the Parliament by a whole bunch of “oil honchos … each of whom was staggering under the weight of the huge garlands and bouquets they had brought with them to greet me.”

This book is partly a history of India from 1991 to 2024. A lot of unfortunate things happened in the country in this period. The Babri Masjid demolition, for one. Gujarat riots, another. The economic reforms that Manmohan Singh initiated. Aiyar discusses all these in fair detail. His views are worth reading. For example, what he says about the Babri demolition:

The road was thus opened to Hindu majoritarianism and to the resultant apprehensions among the Muslim and other minority communities about their place in India being overtaken by vicious communalism that seemed to be heading towards ‘Hindu raj’, or, rather, Hindutva raj, for the country.

He doesn’t hesitate to state that even the Congress was influenced by this shift and the party became more rightist so much so Muslims were discouraged by Congress from canvassing in the election that followed in Gujarat.

What about Manmohan Singh’ economic reforms? This is what Aiyar concludes:

Thirty years after economic reforms were initiated in India, there is a duopoly of businessmen, among the richest in the world, who dominate an economy in which some 300 million live in absolute poverty (destitution) and about 700 million consider themselves poor. The bulk of the remainder of the population remains ‘aspirational’, in the sense that they still nurture hopes of improving their lot. The top wealthy businessmen have been co-opted, particularly through the electoral bonds scheme, to provide the money and muscle power that characterize elections in our country, making a commerce of politics. Inequality has grown exponentially, and the India that we dreamt of during the freedom movement and envisioned in the Constitution is a distant, abandoned dream. Crony capitalism has replaced socialism. Growth is cruelly purchased at the expense of equity.

The Congress party was ousted brutally in the 2014 general elections because of charges of corruption. There was corruption, no doubt. Manmohan Singh was not a ‘singh’ (lion) at all when it came to dealing with corruption in his party. However, all the noise made by people like Anna Hazare and Baba Ramdev against corruption was not really justified, Aiyar implies. For example, A Raja and Kanimozhi spent a year in Tihar jail in connection with 12 lakh crore rupees (12 followed by 12 zeros, says Aiyar to highlight the enormity of the amount) supposedly swallowed by politicians in the spectrum auction of those days. Both Raja and Kanimozhi were released by the court after a year, cleared of all charges. So what about the charges of corruption? People forgot. Because the elections were over and Modi was on his throne.

What has Modi done to India? Aiyar deals with that towards the end of his memoirs. Pretty bad. That’s the plain answer. The country stands divided between Hindus versus the rest. Modi has made enemies of all neighbouring nations such as Pakistan, Nepal, and Maldives. It is easy to make enemies in the name of manliness and bravado. But the real master makes friends. Is Modi an aberration in Indian history? Aiyar seems to think so. And Rahul Gandhi, in spite of his apparent dislike of Aiyar, seems to be the only saviour of the Congress party, according to Aiyar who believes that the Gandhi family is the most suitable custodian of the Congress lineage. [This is one point on which I disagree entirely with Aiyar.]

This is an eminently readable book. Anyone who wants to see India from 1991 to 2024 through the eyes of a self-proclaimed maverick Congressman – who even considered leaving the party at least once – will find this book immensely worthwhile. It’s an honest narrative.

Previous Post: The Irresistible Mating of Languages

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Not one I would pick up - but appreciate your worthy commentary on it! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aiyar's weekly columns in various publications drew me to his book.

      Delete
  2. He is someone one cannot ignore. You have to either love him or hate him or both intermittently!

    ReplyDelete
  3. His Gandhi-family Idolization, apart, he has lived up to his self-nomenclature, as a " Maverick in Politics." I should say he handled the portfolios in Ministry, with honesty and imagination, especially, the Panchayath Raj. We ven e the word, " Secular Fundamentalism" to him, to oppose the Majoritarian Cultural Nationalism of Sangh Parivar and even the Soft Hindutva of his own party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm totally with you on this. I forgot to mention Aiyar's contributions to Panchayat Raj. Thanks for highlighting that. And yes, his opposition to Congress's soft Hindutva is commendable too.

      Delete
  4. How nice. Sometimes these kinds of memoirs aren't worth the trouble.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aiyar is a knowledgeable person, so his writings are worth a read.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...