Skip to main content

The Harpist by the River

Preface

One of the songs that has haunted me all along is By the Rivers of Babylon by Boney M [1978]. It is inspired by the biblical Psalm 137. The Psalm was written after the Babylonian King, Nebuchadnezzar II, conquered the kingdom of Judah and destroyed their most sacred temple in Jerusalem. The Jews were soon exiled to Babylon. Then some Babylonians asked the Jews to sing songs for them. Psalm 137 is a response to that: “How can we sing the Lord’s song in an alien land?” There is profound sorrow in the psalm. Exile and longing for homeland, oppression by enemies, and loss of identity are dominant themes. Boney M succeeded in carrying all those deep emotions and pain in their verses too.

As I was wondering what to write for today’s #WriteAPageADay challenge, Boney M’s version of Psalm 137 wafted into my consciousness from the darkness and silence outside my bedroom long before daybreak. How to make it make sense to a reader of today who may know nothing about the Jewish exile and their agonies? The following story was the answer. 

The Harpist by the River

Fiction

“I won’t sing anymore nor play the harp until Yahweh wreaks vengeance upon the Babylonians for destroying His Temple,” Nathan vowed as he hung his harp by a piece of palm rope on the branch of a poplar tree not far from the Euphrates. The Temple was built by none other than King Solomon and it housed the sacred Ark of the Covenant. And now it lay in smithereens. Destroyed by idol-worshipping pagans.

“Destroying the enemy’s temple is the worst anyone can do to them,” Amos said to Nathan. Amos was Nathan’s best friend. “See, even your God is powerless in front of us – that’s what the enemy wants to tell us through this destruction.” Amos wondered whether Yahweh was indeed powerless though he didn’t articulate that blasphemy. How many times has Yahweh abandoned us again and again? Amos’s faith in Yahweh was strong, but had it begun to waver a little?

We are the chosen race, according to Yahweh’s repeated assurances. Amos reflected to himself. But He has given us up umpteen times by now. If only He didn’t choose us anymore!

And the next moment he sought Yahweh’s forgiveness. Blasphemy is a huge sin.

A Babylonian messenger came and ordered Nathan to go with him to the house of noblewoman Amat-Ishtar.

“The lady has heard about your magical music and wants you to play for her in her court.”

Nathan refused bluntly.

Amos came to his rescue again. “You’d better go,” he counselled. “That lady is very powerful and you know what power means for helpless people like us.” Amos asked Nathan to remember Eliakim.

Eliakim was a Jewish scribe. That is, a religious scholar and copyist. He refused to work for Amat-Ishtar and so he was starved to death. Power sucks your blood to the last drop either way: your skills or your very life.

Nathan didn’t want to die of starvation. Not yet. He has to wait until Yahweh proves His prowess to the Babylonians. “If I forget you Jerusalem, may my right hand wither!” Nathan muttered to himself. And said yes to the messenger.

May my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I forget you. Nathan was composing his new song as he walked to the palace of Amat-Ishtar.

Amat-Ishar, graceful outside and feral inside, thought Nathan was singing about her. She was used to adulation.

She was swayed by the magic in Nathan’s harp. Intoxicated by Nathan’s love for Yahweh which she mistook as for her.

“Your wish will be granted,” Amat-Ishtar declared solemnly in the stupor of her intoxication. Nathan wanted Eliakim back.

And Eliakim, the scribe, appeared before him in minutes. A skeleton that didn’t even have the energy to stand erect. He was not dead yet; he was dying. Yahweh is great, Nathan muttered to himself.

Nathan sang for Yahweh again and again. Ceaselessly. 

By rivers cold, we wept so long,
Our harps in silence knew our pain,
Yet hope has burned, a hidden spark,
And now we rise to sing again!

Nathan’s music had magic.

“Bring fire to your lines, man,” Amos said to Nathan. “Only when poetry sets hearts on fire will Yahweh come with his brimstone to Nebuchadnezzar.”

Arise, Yahweh, arise and become a flame in our hearts, Nathan’s poetry acquired a new tone altogether. Yahweh’s power is our power, he sang. The Jews repeated his lines.

What is God but the longing in human hearts? Amos contemplated.

And now we rise to sing again!

Yahweh, Yahweh, Yahweh… They chanted… until Yahweh brought Cyrus of Persia to take back Judah from Babylonians and let Yahweh’s own people return as well as build a new Temple.

“One Nation One Religion is a policy of bigots,” Cyrus declared. “Let every citizen discover his God in his own heart. To every man his own God.”

Amos was happy to let Yahweh return to his heart though Yahweh hadn’t changed a bit all the while. Nathan continued to play his harp in the new temple in Jerusalem. And his songs returned to the old harmonious melodies. The Jordan river gurgled on merrily.

PS. Both images generated by Copilot Designer

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    A tidy tale... we could do with a few more harpists for real! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. thanks! by the way, an appropriate song :) https://youtu.be/l3QxT-w3WMo?si=XSV8hsxG_RHITiXx

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Water as Weapon

A scene from Kerala The theme chosen for their monthly blog hop by friends Manali Desai and Sukaina Majeed is water, particularly because March 22 is World Water Day. It is of vital importance to discuss the global water crisis because as the motto of Delhi Jal Board says: Jal hi Jeevan hai , Water is Life . The crisis is only going to become more and more acute as we move on. With a global population clocking 8.5 billion by 2030, the demand for fresh water will rise sharply, especially in urban areas. The climate change, particularly rising temperatures, prolonged droughts, and erratic rainfall patterns, will add significantly to the problem. Ground water is getting depleted in many countries. Consequently, water is likely to be a strategic asset in the near future. Powerful individuals, corporations, and nations may use it as a weapon in several ways. Rivers can be blocked with dams and water supply to neighbouring nations can be manipulated. Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam o...

Grandeur of the dooms

John Keats by William Hilton [Wikipedia] One of the poems included in CBSE’s class 12 English literature is an extract from Keats’ Endymion . A question that has come to me again and again from students as well as teachers is: What does “the grandeur of the dooms…” mean? It is a line that has perplexed me too. I have been amused by the kind of interpretations given in the guidebooks for students. Quite many of these books interpret the word ‘dooms’ to mean the Doomsday. Look at the following answer given in one such guidebook made available online by a well-known educational establishment.  That is very amusing considering the fact that Keats was an agnostic, if not a confirmed atheist. Keats would never accept a God who would come riding a majestic cloud on the day of the Last Judgment to apportion the good and the evil souls to Heaven and Hell. Evil is an integral part of life, Keats knew too well. No human can avoid evil any more than “a rose can avoid a blighting wind.” How...

Broligarchy

A page from Time Broligarchy is a new word I learnt from the latest issue of the Time magazine one of whose lead stories is titled ‘ American Broligarchy ’. Wikipedia teaches me that ‘broligarchy’ is “a neologism and portmanteau combining oligarchy and broism describing the rule of government by a coterie of extremely wealthy men (occupying leadership roles in the tech companies and tech-enabled businesses).” The Time article informs us that Trump’s greatest “bros” are Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, the three men who were given the most prominent seats, ahead of Cabinet members, at Trump’s Presidential inauguration. These wealthy businessmen play crucial roles in Trump’s way of governing America. They pump a lot of unregulated money into politics for their own selfish reasons. A menacing outcome is an unhealthy (for the public) expansion of presidential power with fewer checks on the Congress. The Time laments that this “would be a recipe for more corruption under an...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Love Affair of Pearl Spot

AI-generated I am not fond of fish. Fish doesn’t taste like fish, that’s the reason. We get adulterated fish most of the time. In Kerala, my state, traders are reported to use formalin for preserving the freshness of fish. Formalin is used for preserving dead bodies by embalming. You will find me in a fish stall once in a while, though. My cats want fish occasionally, that’s why. Not that they are particularly fond of it. For a change from the regular pellets and packaged wet foods, all delivered promptly by Amazon. Even cats love a change. Most of the time, the entire fish that I buy is consumed by my cats. So much so, Maggie and I have come to think that fish is cat food, not human food. People may have different reasons for not eating any particular food. One of the most endearing reasons I heard recently is that fish is a symbol of the voiceless. People commit atrocities on fish, this person said [I forget who – I read it a couple of weeks back on Magzter]. They suffocate it ...