Skip to main content

Choices


The Guest is a short story of Albert Camus that has remained in my consciousness for years. The protagonist, Daru, is a French schoolteacher who lives in his “schoolhouse” on a remote hillside “almost like a monk.” The setting is during the Algerian War of Independence against France. One day Daru finds himself ordered by a French gendarme to keep an Arab murderer with him for the night before taking him to the police authorities the next morning.

Daru is not a shallow nationalist who will do anything that his country demands merely because he was born in that country. He believes in his own individual rights and moral duties more than in national obligations. What do patriotism and nationalism mean if they demand actions from you that go against your personal convictions? You become antinational. You can be labelled anything like ‘a terrorist’ or ‘an urban Naxal.’ You can be arrested and killed by your nation though you have done nothing wrong by your personal morality and convictions. Your office can be raided, properties confiscated, house bulldozed…

Daru’s sympathies are with neither his colonial government nor the murderous Arab prisoner. But he is not interested in doing the task assigned to him: leading a fellow human being to the brutal police. He leaves the prisoner unchained at night so that he can escape if he wants. But the prisoner doesn’t escape.

Daru takes the man to the police headquarters the next morning. But, on the way, he stops, hands over a packet of food to the prisoner and says, “Take it. There are dates, bread, and sugar. You can hold out for two days. Here are a thousand francs too.”

Daru tells him also how to reach “the administration and the police” if he chooses to. But that’s the choice of the prisoner. If he wants, he can surrender himself. If he chooses otherwise, he can escape.

Daru is acting in accordance with his own moral convictions. Daru, like his creator Camus, doesn’t approve of the French government’s oppression of the native Algerians. Camus also believed that one’s national obligations should not override one’s personal moral responsibility. By giving the Arab prisoner a choice over his fate, Daru is rejecting the imposition of duties on him by his nation. He is making a personal choice.

But he has to pay heavily for it. As a result of this choice, he becomes an enemy of his government. Ironically, he becomes an enemy of the Arab revolutionaries too. When he returns to his classroom later, he sees the inscription on the blackboard: “You handed over our brother. You will pay for this.”

How much liberty does an individual really have? Can you live without taking sides in any country? Is it necessary for you to be right or left or liberal? Is it necessary to accept a label and live with that? If you are not with us, you are against us?

Camus was not against the idea of national obligations, of course. He wouldn’t accept any national obligation that goes against a person’s individual conscience. One’s duty to humanity outweighs duty to the state. I find Camus appealing all the more to me as years go by. 


PS. A post I wrote 12 years ago on the same short story: Camus’ Predicament


[Both images generated by Copilot Designer]

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    A subject that is as pertinent to ponder these days as last century, or the centuries before... more and more we see evidence that to differ from the views of 'the state' is to immediately be at risk... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The latest is the blocking of a magazine website because of a cartoon on Modi! Even humor dies...

      Delete
  2. Hatred and narcissism does not tolerate humour or justice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you very much! Camus is also one of my favorites. I love particularly the "carnets" https://shorturl.at/CNrhS

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kinda timely. I'm sure you know this. I never could get Camus, but then again, I was exposed to him as a teenager. I'll probably read him differently now.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...