While my car was getting
serviced, I walked into a multiplex this morning in order to while away the
three hours demanded by the service provider.
My wife suggested watching a movie and the ticket was available for the
Malayalam movie, Godha.
Godha is just an average movie about the
sport of wrestling which is dying in Kerala.
There are a few individuals in a village who still live with nostalgic
memories about the wrestling trophies they had won in their youth. Into their midst walks a young girl, Aditi,
from Punjab. Aditi is a wrestler. She revives the akhara and brings laurels to the village and the state.
There’s a bit of romance
to add the necessary spice to the plot.
Anjaneya Das, the protagonist, had gone to Punjab to study where he met
Aditi. It’s that connection which brings
Aditi to Das’s village. While Das is in
Punjab he tells a companion about what beef means to the people of Kerala. “It’s not just a dish,” he says, “beef is a sentiment for the people of
Kerala.” Listening to the
description, the companion goes in search of beef roast in Punjab and gets
beaten up by people who ask him, “The cow is our mother and you want to eat
her?”
The city supplements of
today’s Times
of India is dedicated to the ‘beef sentiments’ of the people of Kerala.
The headline is taken from the movie
mentioned above: For Malayalis, beef is
not just a food but a sentiment. The
movie was released much before the Modi (government) of India banned beef in
the country for all practical purposes.
I watched the movie purely by chance: just because I couldn’t get a
ticket for Bahubali 2 or some other
movie. I loved the coincidences,
however.
I was reminded of what Swami Vivekananda said in
response to a question about beef eating. “There was a time in this very India when,
without eating beef, no Brahmin could remain a Brahmin; you read in the Vedas
how, when a Sannyasin, a king, or a great man came into a house, the best
bullock was killed; how in time it was found that as we were an agricultural
race, killing the best bulls meant annihilation of the race. Therefore the
practice was stopped, and a voice was raised against the killing of cows.”
Killing of bulls and cows
was banned in the country because of a practical requirement: to prevent the “annihilation
of the race.” Not because of religious
reasons. So when did religion enter into
the business? Obviously, when politics found a convenient
scapegoat in the cow.
I lived in Delhi for a decade and a
half and was struck by the sheer callous indifference of people as well as
authorities towards the cows that roamed the streets eating whatever they could
get from garbage dumps. Of course, there
were occasional devotees or some such people who offered food to the cows. Generally the cows were a neglected lot. So when I hear the war cries on behalf of
cows today, I wonder what the warmongers did for the cows on the streets. If their love for the animal is genuine, why
don’t they take care of them in the first place?
I live in Kerala now. But I never bought beef in the last two years
except once. Today, however, while
returning home after the movie I stopped at a meat shop and asked for
beef. The owner who has kept pictures of
about half a dozen Hindu gods on the walls of the shop told me with a pregnant
smile, “Beef was sold out at ten today.
Unusual.”
“Is it because of the
ban?” I asked.
“Could be. Forbidden food is tastier, isn’t it?”
I smiled because what he
said was more true about me than about his other buyers probably.
Coincidentally, again, the book which I’m currently reading
is Standstill Utopias? Dalits
Encountering Christianity by Jose Maliekal.
The book is about the Madiga people in the Telugu country. These people earned their livelihood by
skinning dead cows and making leather products.
They even ate the flesh of the dead cows and bulls which were given to
them by the higher caste people. There
are many such communities of people in other states too. What do such people do now?
From Facebook |
Just like the
demonetisation exercise which was carried out whimsically and achieved little significant
purpose, this beef politics will also probably end up achieving little but
creating a lot of ruckus in the country.
The people of Kerala, at least, have openly shown their reistance. Yesterday they held beef fests all over the
state. Even the law makers and law
keepers of the state were seen consuming beef openly.
I don’t wish to jump to conclusions. But the BJP may do well to use the grey
matter a little more than the saffron.
Maybe, the BJP has
ulterior motives. Rumours have already been set
afoot in Kerala that a temple in Malappuram district (a predominantly Muslim area) has been
desecrated. Let us not forget
that this is how most communal riots began in the country. The coincidence of beef ban with the beginning
of Ramadan also smells ominous.
The national borders are
resounding too. The avalanches on the
Himalayas are waiting to roll down. Ominously.
Forbidden food tastes better than others. BJP wanted a chance to humiliate others and they got it in beef. If not why would they want to ban it when the Ramadan begin. It's nothing religious to ban beef. Even if it is constitution of India is above all government and judiciary as long as it is amended. Constitution defines india as a secular state and ensures liberty of faith. Then on what basis can they say the need ban is religious. If it is religious how can one society force it on other society in a country which gives no religion special privilege and promise liberty and.
ReplyDeleteNothing religious about it. The ban is politically motivated. Its purpose is elimination of certain communities of people by denying them their traditions and food. Both food and traditions are integral for a people's survival.
DeleteI agree. But let me put forward a hypothesis
ReplyDeleteLet's take a different situation. Our state is a state where pork is consumed in a significant amount. We have our various local indigenous pork dishes.
Had our state been in a Muslim dominated country, would we be allowed to hold a pork fest openly to oppose restrictions? We would have been beheaded.
But in India, we can protest in such forms openly and audaciously. We enjoy freedom or perhaps we are testing our limits of freedom.
Can I hold a pork fest in darker places of muzzafarpur or in dulhagarh?
I love all kind of red meats, most probably because of our cultural integration with various tribes in North east but how far and till which limits of geographical location can we dare to protest in such audacity?
The issue is not with BJP it can as much be the same with a democratic Muslim party. Oh hell, the issue is with religious sentiments of dumb people.
I could easily get a teaching job in one of the Gulf countries and they pay handsome salary. But I refused to go there precisely because of the religious bigotry that prevails there. I would have been dead long ago if I were working in a Muslim country. So the parallel you are drawing is justified.
DeleteBut I chose to stay in India which pays me a pittance because India at least affords me the liberty to believe in whatever I like and speak my views openly. If India becomes like a Muslim country, then what's great about it anymore? Why should I stay in this country earning a salary which doesn't even permit me to live with a fraction of the luxury that my democratically elected leaders can afford? I hope you get the point. This comparison or contrast with Muslim countries is the worst logic I have seen in India. We had that tradition of what Amartya Sen called argumentativeness. We respected diversity of all sorts. BJP is destroying that great tradition for selfish political purposes. It's a greater tragedy than what you have understood, I think.
I drew a comparison with muslim countries, yes. But I also wrote about predominantly Muslim populated areas in India. Can I openly hold a grand fest of pork consumption in such places? In silchar, a part of assam, there is a huge Muslim population and I had trouble finding pork meat there.
DeleteI find holding on to a fixed ideology quite disastrous to ones mental well being. It brings in a lot of self agitation.
Why can't we look at the wrongs at both the roads.
Oh, blaming Hindus is liberal but blaming Muslims is blasphemy? See, I hate pseudo liberals as well as pro Hindu bhakts.
Why can't we seek a middle path instead. Why do we have to be a stickler to argumentative ideologies.
I think you got me wrong here, I am against holding open fest of consuming meat which might offend people of other religions. Not against consumption of meat in their personal spaces.
DeleteBJP is perhaps restricting the consumption of a particular meat and it is fair enough to protest. But protesting in such a manner? That's where I had the problem.
Yes, I am too slow to grab hold of certain meanings in between the lines 😂
Your last comment relieves me more than you can imagine. I would have been sad otherwise. Because I'm one who had a lot of admiration for Hinduism as a dharma until it was degenerated into the present day Hindutva and my admiration can now be only be expressed with a veil over it. What I lament is the degeneration of a great philosophy into a proposed monolithic, and possibly a monotheistic, religion. Well, I won't explain it any further.
Deletethere has neither been a beef ban nor cow slaughter. The following newspaper article describes it the best
ReplyDeletehttp://www.firstpost.com/politics/centres-cattle-slaughter-restrictions-keralas-protests-over-non-existent-beef-ban-are-counter-intuitive-3493771.html
In practice, it is equal to ban on beef altogether. Dear Durga ji, it has been a very shrewd movement to deny certain communities their food as well as certain traditions. The makers of this ordinance are so crooked that it can be interpreted in umpteen ways. What you have given is one such interpretation. The ordinance destroys the livelihood of thousands of people in the country. If you want details i can provide.
Delete